Save

Mavīzāb and Fuqqāʿ: An Ilkhanid-Period Dispute as Evidence in the Sphero-Conical Vessels Debate

In: Muqarnas Online
Authors:
Martina Rugiadi
Search for other papers by Martina Rugiadi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Abdullah Ghouchani †
Search for other papers by Abdullah Ghouchani † in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roshanak Keyghobadi
Search for other papers by Roshanak Keyghobadi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Viola Allegranzi
Search for other papers by Viola Allegranzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The monolithic designation of “sphero-conical vessels,” chosen to circumvent the long-standing modern debate around the function of these objects, does not satisfy the multiplicity of terms and uses that they had in the past. A munāẓara (disputation) by Zangi al-Bukhari titled “Dispute between the mavīzāb and the fuqqāʿ of the Iranians” (presented here in full translation) provides new insight into one such use, while also expanding our understanding of everyday life in late thirteenth–early fourteenth-century Baghdad.

Drawing from this Persian work and from Arabic medieval cookery books, this essay connects the physical qualities of drinks and associated etiquettes of consumption to the materiality of surviving objects. Still raisin drinks were ladled from large metal bowls into smaller ones. Earthenware sphero-conical vessels, perhaps a group among those resembling pinecones, were used individually, to gulp down the foam of effervescent drinks.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 228 228 40
Full Text Views 18 18 0
PDF Views & Downloads 203 203 0