Integrated management of root-knot nematodes on tomato in glasshouse production using nematicides and a biocontrol agent, and their effect on soil microbial communities

in Nematology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Nematicides are the main method for managing root-knot nematodes but they are not environmentally benign. Biological control is one alternative that has a lower or no environmental impact. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two nematicides (Fosthiazate and Dazomet), a biocontrol agent (Purpureocillium lilacinum (= Paecilomyces lilacinus) YES-2), their combination on controlling root-knot nematodes on tomato plants and their effects on the rhizosphere microbial community in long-term glasshouse experiments. The gall index and numbers of second-stage juveniles (J2) were significantly reduced by the individual treatments of Fosthiazate, Dazomet or P. lilacinum YES-2. Purpureocillium lilacinum YES-2 combined with a half dose of Fosthiazate showed the most efficient control as indicated by gall index and number of J2 compared with the control treatment in glasshouse experiments conducted over a 5-year period (2007-2011). The bacterial and fungal biodiversity in soil measured using Biolog ECO MicroPlates and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprint was higher in the treatments of P. lilacinum YES-2 alone or its combination with chemicals than in the treatments of Dazomet or Fosthiazate (in 2011 only). This study suggested a synergistic effect on the control of root-knot nematode by P. lilacinum YES-2 combined with Fosthiazate, and the contribution of these two treatments to the microbial communities in the soil.

Integrated management of root-knot nematodes on tomato in glasshouse production using nematicides and a biocontrol agent, and their effect on soil microbial communities

in Nematology



AnandT.ChandrasekaranA.KuttalamS.SenthilrajaG.SamiyappanR. (2010). Integrated control of fruit rot and powder mildew of chilli using the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens and a chemical fungicide. Biological Control 521-7.

BridgeJ.PageS.L.J. (1980). Estimation of root-knot nematode infestation levels on roots using a rating chart. Tropical Pest Management 26296-298.

BuckJ.W. (2004). Combination of fungicides with phylloplane yeasts for improved control of Botrytis cinerea on geranium seedlings. Phytopathology 94196-202.

Burkett-CadenaM.Kokalis-BurelleN.LawrenceK.S.van SantenE.KloepperJ.W. (2008). Suppressiveness of root-knot nematodes mediated by rhizobacteria. Biological Control 4755-59.

Chand-GoyalT.SpottsR.A. (1996). Postharvest biological control of blue mold of apple and brown rot of sweet cherry by natural saprophytic yeasts alone or in combination with low doses of fungicides. Biological Control 6253-259.

DuanW.J.YangE.C.XiangM.C.LiuX.Z. (2008). Effect of storage conditions on the survival of two potential biocontrol agents of nematodes, the fungi Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pochonia chlamydosporia. Biocontrol Science Technology 18613-620.

DuffyB. (2000). Combination of pencycuron and Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 2-79 for integrated control of Rhizoctonia root rot and take-all of spring wheat. Crop Protection 1921-25.

EgamberdiyevaD.HöflichG. (2004). Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of cotton and pea in a semi-arid region of Uzbekistan. Journal of Arid Environments 56293-301.

FrancesJ.VilardellP.BonaterraA.BadosaE.MontesinosE. (2002). Combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens EPS288 and reduced fungicide dose for control of Penicillium rot during postharvest storage of pear. Acta Horticulturae 596883-886.

IbekweA.M.PapiernikS.K.GrieveC.M.YangC.H. (2001). Influence of fumigants on soil microbial diversity and survival of E. coli O157:H7. Journal of Environmental Science and Health B 45416-426.

JatalaP.KaltenbackR.BocangelM.DevausA.J.CamposR. (1980). Field application of Paecilomyces lilacinus for controlling Meloidogyne incognita on potatoes. Journal of Nematology 12226-227.

KishoreG.K.PandeS.PodileA.R. (2005). Management of late leaf spot of groundnut with chlorothaloni-tolerant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Plant Pathology 54401-408.

KloseS.Acosta-MartinezV.AjwaH.A. (2006). Microbial community composition and enzyme activities in a sandy loam soil after fumigation with methyl bromide or alternative biocides. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 381243-1254.

KondohM.HiraiM.ShodaM. (2001). Integrated biological and chemical control and chemical control of damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani using Bacillus subtilis RB14-C and flutolanil. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 91173-177.

LeemanM.Den OudenF.M.Van PeltJ.A.CornelissenC.Matamala-GarrosA.BakkerP.A.H.M.SchippersB. (1996). Suppression of Fusarium wilt of radish by co-inoculation of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and root-colonizing fungi. European Journal of Plant Pathology 10221-31.

LiA.YangS.LiX.GuJ. (2008). Microbial population dynamics during aerobic sludge granulation at different organic loading rates. Water Research 423552-3560.

MartezJ.L.AcostaN.BetancourtC.VicenteN.RodriguezR. (1996). Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita in tomato in Puerto Rico. Nematropica 26143-152.

MoosaviM.R.ZareR.ZamanizadehH.R.FatemyS. (2010). Pathogenicity of Pochonia species on eggs of Meloidogyne javanica. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 104125-133.

MuyzerG.WaalE.C.D.UitterlindenA.G. (1993). Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied Environmental Microbiology 59695-700.

OmarL.O’NeillT.M.RossallS. (2006). Biological control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato with antagonistic bacteria and integrated control when combined with the fungicide carbendazim. Plant Pathology 5592-99.

Rodriguez-RomeroA.S.BadosaE.MontesinosE.Jaizme-VegaM.C. (2008). Growth promotion and biological control of root-knot nematodes in micropropagated banana during the nursery stage by treatment with specific bacterial strains. Annals of Applied Biology 15241-48.

ShaukatS.S.SiddiquiI.A. (2001). Lantana camara in the soil changes the fungal community structure and reduces impact of Meloidogyne javanica on mungbean. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40245-252.

SiddiquiI.ShaukatS.S. (2003). Effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the diversity of culturable microfungi and nematodes associated with tomato: impact on root-knot disease and plant growth. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 351359-1368.

SiddiquiZ.A.AkhtarM.S. (2009). Effects of antagonistic fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth of tomato and reproduction of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Australasian Plant Pathology 3822-28.

SunM.H.GaoL.ShiY.X.LiB.J.LiuX.Z. (2006). Fungi and actinomycetes associated with Meloidogyne spp. eggs and females in China and their biocontrol potential. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 9322-28.

WadaS.ToyatoK. (2008). Effect of three organophosphorous nematicides on non-target nematodes and soil microbial community. Microbes and Environments 23331-336.

WalkerH.L.ConnickW.J.J. (1983). Sodium alginate for production and formulation of mycoherbicides. Weed Science 31333-338.

WellerD.M. (1988). Biocontrol of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 26379-407.

ZhangJ.ZengG.ChenY.YuM.YuZ.LiH.HuangH. (2011). Effects of physico-chemical parameters on the bacterial and fungal communities during agricultural waste composting. Bioresource Technology 1022950-2956.

ZhaoY.LiuB.ZhangW.HuC.AnS. (2010). Effects of plant and influent C:N:P ratio on microbial diversity in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Ecology Engineering 36441-449.


  • View in gallery

    Average well colour development (AWCD) of the Biolog ECO plates. NS: No significant difference; P. lilacinum = Purpureocillium lilacinum. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

  • View in gallery

    Principal component analysis (PCA) of soil samples based on carbon utilisation profiles of microbial communities: P. lilacinum = Purpureocillium lilacinum.

  • View in gallery

    A: DGGE profiles of amplified 16S rDNA fragments from the samples; B: UPGMA tree based on the DGGE results. PL: Purpureocillium lilacinum YES-2.

  • View in gallery

    A: DGGE profiles of amplified 18S rDNA fragments from the samples; B: UPGMA tree based on the DGGE results. PL: Purpureocillium lilacinum YES-2.

  • View in gallery

    Principal component analysis of soil microbial community variability (bacteria plus fungi) in different treatment based on the DGGE results.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 9
Full Text Views 11 11 11
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0