The European Court of Human Rights as an Example of Convergence

in Nordic Journal of International Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The article summarizes the main findings of a study on the legal culture of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). 1 Special attention is given to the question of how individual legal, vocational, historical and other experiences of the judges have an impact on their voting behaviour. Starting from the debate on convergence and divergence of law, it is legitimate to expect that these formative differences in individual experiences of the judges should matter. Surprisingly, the results gained through interviews, field study and empirical analysis of judgments show that their diversities in background are no hinder to convergence inside the Court. Especially, it is not the mentalités of the judges that create problems to the coming together of differences. Instead, it is in fact the mentalités of judges that promote convergence through pushing specific ideals and fostering homogeneity.

Nordic Journal of International Law

Acta scandinavica juris gentium

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 8 8 3
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0