Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Loss and damage from the impacts of climate change affect many countries and communities across the world. In 2013, the Warsaw Mechanism on Loss and Damage, created through the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (unfccc), established an institutional process to respond to such impacts. This paper aims to contribute to the growing literature on climate liability by outlining a normative framework based on international law that can be used as a guiding path for the mechanism. It is argued that addressing loss and damage in line with these core principles and international law is required to develop a robust and legitimate mechanism. This framework is then used to answer critical questions regarding an international loss and damage mechanism for climate change.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Dow et al., ibid., p. 87.
Dow et al., supra note 29, p. 85.
Cancun Agreements, supra note 13, unfccc/cp/2010/7/Add.1, para. 11.
J. Serna, ‘Hurricane Sandy Death Toll Climbs Above 110, N.Y Hardest Hit’, L.A Times, 3 November 2012, <articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/03/nation/la-na-nn-hurricane-sandy-deaths-climb-20121103>, visited on 1 September 2013; ‘Uttarkhand: 5000 Feared Killed, 19,000 Still Stranded’, Times of India, 23 June 2013, <articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-06-23/india/40146595_1_kedarnath-gaurikund-badrinath>, visited on 1 September 2013; J. Parnell, ‘Tides Swamp Climate Vulnerable Marshall Islands,’ Rtcc.org, 28 June 2013, <www.rtcc.org/2013/06/26/tides-swamp-climate-vulnerable-marshall-islands/>, visited on 1 September 2013.
Posner and Sustien, supra note 43, pp. 1583–1602.
Brown, supra note 36, p. 193.
Baskin, supra note 18, p. 7.
Baer, supra note 56, p. 253.
Burkett, supra note 61, p. 111.
J. Havris, ‘Climate Change in the Dock: Rethinking the Role of International Law’, Responding to Climate Change, <www.rtcc.org/2013/06/06/why-a-radical-legal-landscape-is-needed-to-ensure-climate-justice/>, visited on 9 August 2013.
G. Blum and N. J. Lockwood, ‘Earthquakes and Wars: The Logic of International Reparations’, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 12–30 (2012) p. 28.
Burkett, supra note 66, p. 14.
Blum and Lockwood, supra note 65, p. 1–33.
Burkett, supra note 66, p. 13.
D. A. Kysar, ‘Climate Change and the International Court of Justice’, Yale University Working Paper Series, 15 August 2013, <papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2309943>, visited on 3 September 2013.
Principle 13, Rio Declaration, supra note 35; Principle 22, Stockholm Declaration on the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 11 ilm (1972), p. 1416.
Verheyen, supra note 74, p. 235.
Cullet, supra note 21, p. 107.
Voigt, supra note 71, pp. 5.
Verheyen, note 74, p. 55–56.
Voigt, supra note 71, p. 6.
Tol and Verheyen, supra note 5, p. 1115.
Verheyen, supra note 74, p. 283.
Voigt, supra note 71, p. 7.
Sands and Peel, supra note 75, p. 708.
International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on the Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities with commentaries’, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, (2001) <legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_7_2001.pdf>, visited on 1 August 2013.
Voigt, supra note 71, p. 9.
Voigt, supra note 71, p. 9.
Voigt, supra note 71, pp. 11–13.
Voigt, supra note 71, p. 15.
Tol and Verheyen, supra note 5, p. 1115.
Tol and Verheyen, supra note 5, p. 1118.
Fourth Assessment Report, supra note 1.
Cullet, supra note 21, p. 116.
Sands and Peel, supra note 75, p. 727.
Cullet, supra note 21, p. 107.
Sands and Peel, supra note 75, p. 738.
Sands and Peel, supra note 75, p. 728.
Verheyen, supra note 74, p. 342.
Linnerooth-Bayer et al., supra note 130, p. 31.
Verheyen, supra note 74, p. 343.
Sands and Peel, supra note 75, p. 282.
Jamieson, supra note 69.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 452 | 148 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 331 | 25 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 176 | 68 | 15 |
Loss and damage from the impacts of climate change affect many countries and communities across the world. In 2013, the Warsaw Mechanism on Loss and Damage, created through the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (unfccc), established an institutional process to respond to such impacts. This paper aims to contribute to the growing literature on climate liability by outlining a normative framework based on international law that can be used as a guiding path for the mechanism. It is argued that addressing loss and damage in line with these core principles and international law is required to develop a robust and legitimate mechanism. This framework is then used to answer critical questions regarding an international loss and damage mechanism for climate change.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 452 | 148 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 331 | 25 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 176 | 68 | 15 |