Volume 89 (2020): Issue 3-4 (Nov 2020)
in Nordic Journal of International Law-
Proportionality in International Law: Whose Interests Count?Pages: 275–285Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Revisiting Proportionality in Internal Market Law: Looking at the Unnamed Actors in the cjeu’s ReasoningPages: 286–302Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Federal Proportionality Review in EU Law: Whose Rights are they Anyway?Pages: 303–326Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Proportionality and the Human Rights of Companies Under the ECHR – Whose Interests are at Stake?Pages: 327–342Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Proportionality and Human Rights Protection in International Investment Arbitration: What’s Left Hanging in the Balance?Pages: 343–363Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
The Discourse of Proportionality and the Use of Force: International Law and the Power of DefinitionPages: 364–382Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Who Is Targeted by the Council’s Sanctions? The UN Security Council and the Principle of ProportionalityPages: 383–398Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
The Proportionality of Unilateral “Targeted” Sanctions: Whose Interests Should Count?Pages: 399–421Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
-
Balancing Interpretative Arguments in International Law – A Linguistic AppraisalPages: 438–452Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
Rebutting Four Arguments in Favour of Resolving ius cogens Norm Conflicts by Means of Proportionality TestsPages: 453–470Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020
-
The Role of Proportionality in International Investment Law and Arbitration: A System-Specific PerspectivePages: 471–491Publication Date: 12 Nov 2020