Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Is it Possible to Dispense with Q?
In: Novum TestamentumAbstract
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem that argue for Markan priority, but the non-existence of Q as the basis of the double tradition material continue to attract scholars. The best known of these theories, the Farrer-Goulder hypothesis arguing for Luke's direct use of Matthew, has been championed most recently by Mark Goodacre. He reworks some of the previous arguments in favour of that hypothesis as well as offering a number of new arguments. This paper assesses the validity of such arguments and the claim that it is now possible to finally dispense with Q.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 380 | 68 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 189 | 14 | 11 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 95 | 20 | 13 |
Abstract
Solutions to the Synoptic Problem that argue for Markan priority, but the non-existence of Q as the basis of the double tradition material continue to attract scholars. The best known of these theories, the Farrer-Goulder hypothesis arguing for Luke's direct use of Matthew, has been championed most recently by Mark Goodacre. He reworks some of the previous arguments in favour of that hypothesis as well as offering a number of new arguments. This paper assesses the validity of such arguments and the claim that it is now possible to finally dispense with Q.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 380 | 68 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 189 | 14 | 11 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 95 | 20 | 13 |