Reading ἔγραψα in 2 Corinthians 2:9 as an Epistolary Aorist

in Novum Testamentum
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article offers a re-reading of ἔγραψα in 2 Cor 2:9. It argues that this verb should be interpreted as an epistolary aorist—thereby indicating a reason for why Paul is presently writing—rather than as a preterit aorist, referring to the “tearful letter.” Reading ἔγραψα as an epistolary aorist in 2:9 resolves tensions with the preceding context produced by the typical interpretation. It also results in a fully coherent reading of 2:5-11, where Paul exhorts the Corinthians to receive back the offender. This study supplements K.L. McKay’s treatment of the epistolary aorist in Novum Testamentum.

Reading ἔγραψα in 2 Corinthians 2:9 as an Epistolary Aorist

in Novum Testamentum

Sections

References

  • 4)

    See e.g. A. PlummerA Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians (ICC; Edinburgh: T & T Clark1915) 55. Plummer surmises that both a personal insult and defiance of Paul’s authority were involved. While most commentators agree with the contours of this reconstruction there are exceptions. C.K. Barrett (“Ὁ ἈΔΙΚΗΣΑΣ [2 Cor 7:12]” in Essays on Paul [Philadelphia: Westminster 1982] 108-117) argues that the person in question was not a member of the Corinthian church but a visiting missionary who opposed Paul and his ministry. M.E. Thrall (“The Offender and the Offence: A Problem of Detection in 2 Corinthians” in Scripture: Meaning and Method—Essays Presented to Anthony Tyrell Hanson for His Seventieth Birthday [ed. B.P. Thompson; Hull UK: Hull University Press 1987] 65-78 at 74-76) proposes that the offender was a member of the Corinthian church who stole money that had been temporarily entrusted to Paul for the collection. In line with a tradition dating back to the Church Fathers C.G. Kruse (“The Offender and the Offense in 2 Corinthians 2:5 and 7:12” EvQ 60 [1988] 129-139) identifies the offender with the incestuous man to whom Paul refers in 1 Cor 5:1-5.

  • 11)

    ThrallII Corinthians1:179.

  • 13)

    FurnishII Corinthians157.

  • 14)

    ThrallII Corinthians1.178.

  • 15)

    HarrisSecond Epistle to the Corinthians230-231. See also P.E. Hughes Paul’s Second Epistle to the Corinthians: The English Text with Introduction Exposition and Notes (NICNT; Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans 1962) 69.

  • 16)

    ThrallII Corinthians1.163 (italics added).

  • 17)

    See also J. LambrechtSecond Corinthians (SP 8; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press1999) 32.

  • 25)

    See McKay“Observations on the Epistolary Aorist in 2 Corinthians” 154-158. McKay is more tentative about 9:3. However many translations (e.g. RSV NRSV and NIV) render ἔπεµψα in 9:3 as “I am sending” as do many exegetes (e.g. Furnish [II Corinthians 421] Harris [Second Epistle to the Corinthians 616] and Matera [II Corinthians 199]).

  • 34)

    See e.g. ThrallII Corinthians168; and Lambrecht Second Corinthians 31.

  • 35)

    See e.g. PlummerII Corinthians49; and Furnish II Corinthians 154.

  • 36)

    R.P. Martin2 Corinthians (WBC 40; Waco, TX: Word1986) 236.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 4
Full Text Views 65 65 18
PDF Downloads 9 9 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0