Did Jesus Oppose the prosbul in the Forgiveness Petition of the Lord’s Prayer?

in Novum Testamentum
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The forgiveness petition of the Lord’s Prayer includes the condition that the petitioner must forgive their own “debtors,” widely taken to be a metaphorical reference to sin-forgiveness. In this article, I argue that to Jesus’ contemporaries “debt” would have been an unusual way of referring to sin, and that the choices made by the Matthean and Lukan redactors show that they understood the Jesus-saying to enjoin debt-forgiveness as well as sin-forgiveness. The prosbul was the only way for pious contemporaries to avoid the Torah’s requirement to periodically forgive debts, and so Jesus opposed the prosbul by enjoining precisely the behaviour which the prosbul made unnecessary.

Did Jesus Oppose the prosbul in the Forgiveness Petition of the Lord’s Prayer?

in Novum Testamentum

Sections

References

  • 1

    Ulrich LuzMatthew 1-7: A Commentary (trans. James E. Crouch; Minneapolis: Fortress2007) 322.

  • 4

    BetzThe Sermon on the Mount372; Luz Matthew 1-7 311; Christopher M. Tuckett Q and the History of Early Christianity (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1996) 152; Davies and Allison Matthew 1-7 592-593; Georg Strecker The Sermon on the Mount: An Exegetical Commentary trans. O.C. Dean (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1988) 108. Goulder doubts that any part of the Lord’s Prayer is authentic (M.D. Goulder “The Composition of the Lord’s Prayer” jts 14/11 [1963]) but see Goodacre’s critique (Mark S. Goodacre Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm [jsnts; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic 1996] 53-55).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    StreckerThe Sermon on the Mount119.

  • 6

    Matthew BlackAn Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts (Oxford: Clarendon1967) 140; Davies and Allison Matthew 1-7 611; R.T. France The Gospel of Matthew (nicnt; Cambridge: Eerdmans 2007) 250 n. 72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    LuzMatthew 1-7311; Davies and Allison Matthew 1-7 611-612.

  • 8

    BetzThe Sermon on the Mount400-403.

  • 9

    Douglas E. OakmanJesus and the Economic Questions of His Day (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen1986) 154.

  • 10

    Richard A. HorsleyJesus and the Spiral of Violence (Minneapolis: Fortress1993) 254.

  • 12

    Samuel Tobias Lachs“On Matthew vi.12,” NovT 17/ 1 (1975) 6-8; Craig S. Keener The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Cambridge: Eerdmans 2009) 222 n. 179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Christopher J.H. Wright“Sabbatical Year,” ABD 5 (1992) 857.

  • 15

    Wright“Sabbatical Year” 858-859.

  • 16

    Jeffrey H. TigayThe JPS Torah Commentary: Deuteronomy (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society1996) 145; Moshe Weinfeld Social Justice in Ancient Israel (Minneapolis: Fortress 1995) 162-166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    J.J.M. Roberts“Melchizedek (11Q13 = 11QMelchizedek = 11QMelch),” in Pesharim Other Commentaries and Related Documents (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2002) 264267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Aaron Rothkoff“Prosbul (Heb. פרוזבול or פרוסבול ),” EncJud 13:1182.

  • 23

    Gunter StembergerIntroduction to the Talmud and Midrash (trans. Markus Bockmuehl; Edinburgh: T&T Clark1996) 64.

  • 24

    Alexander SamelyForms of Rabbinic Literature and Thought: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press2007) 98.

  • 25

    Jacob NeusnerThe Rabbinic Traditions about the Pharisees before 70 (Leiden: Brill1971) 117-120; Solomon Zeitlin “Prosbol: A Study in Tannaitic Jurisprudence” jqr 37/4 (1947) 341-362; Daniel R. Schwartz “Hillel and Scripture: From Authority to Exegesis” in Hillel and Jesus: Comparative Studies of Two Major Religious Leaders (ed. James H. Charlesworth and L. Johns Loren; Minneapolis: Fortress 1997) 333; David Innstone-Brewer Traditions of the Rabbis from the Era of the New Testament Vol. 1: Prayer and Agriculture (Cambridge: Eerdmans 2004) 249. See also Jacob Neusner “From Exegesis to Fable in Rabbinic Traditions about the Pharisees” jjs 25/2 (1974) 263-269; C. Safrai “Sayings and Legends in the Hillel Tradition” in Hillel and Jesus: Comparative Studies of Two Major Religious Leaders (ed. James H. Charlesworth and L. Johns Loren; Minneapolis: Fortress 1997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Goodman“The First Jewish Revolt” 419; Goodman The Ruling Class of Judaea 58.

  • 32

    OakmanJesus and the Economic Questions of His Day77.

  • 33

    BlackAn Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts140. See also Joachim Jeremias New Testament Theology (London: scm 1971) 6 n. 15; Koehler Baumgartner and Stamm חוב halot 1:295. See also Willem A. VanGemeren New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis (Carlisle: Paternoster 1997) 39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Gary A. AndersonSin: A History (New Haven & London: Yale University Press2010).

  • 38

    Israel DrazinTargum Onkelos to Exodus (Denver: Ktav1990) 313.

  • 44

    Sjef van TilborgThe Sermon on the Mount As an Ideological Intervention: A Reconstruction of Meaning (Maastricht: Van Gorcum1986) 122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Davies and AllisonMatthew 1-7640.

  • 47

    Davies and AllisonMatthew 1-7616.

  • 48

    BetzThe Sermon on the Mount415.

  • 50

    KeenerThe Gospel of Matthew214; tentatively Luz Matthew 1-7 327.

  • 52

    G.R. Beasley-MurrayJesus and the Kingdom of God (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1986) 115; Goodacre Goulder and the Gospels 200. The parable is “almost universally reckoned an authentic parable of Jesus” (W.D. Davies and Dale C. Allison Matthew 8-18: A Commentary [icc; Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1991] 794); Davies and Allison Matthew 1-7 610; Strecker The Sermon on the Mount 120-121; France The Gospel of Matthew 249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Ernst Fuchs“The Parable of the Unmerciful Servant,” Studia Evangelica 1 (1958).

  • 54

    Davies and AllisonMatthew 8-18803; D.A. Carson “The ΟΜΟΙΟΣ Word-Group As Introduction to Some Matthean Parables” nts 31/2 (1985) 277-282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59

    HaysLuke’s Wealth Ethics111.

  • 61

    GreenLuke212.

  • 62

    HaysLuke’s Wealth Ethics114-115; Fitzmyer Luke I-IX 637.

  • 64

    John S. Kloppenborg“The Dishonoured Master (Luke 16, 1-8A),” Biblica 70/4 (1989) 474-495; David Landry and Ben May “Honor Restored: New Light on the Parable of the Prudent Steward (Luke 16:1-8A)” jbl 119/2 (2000) 287-309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    HaysLuke’s Wealth Ethics143-146.

  • 66

    HaysLuke’s Wealth Ethics158. See also Anthony J. Saldarini Pharisees Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1988) 284 296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 87 87 5
Full Text Views 146 146 0
PDF Downloads 19 19 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0