Paul’s Argument against Gentile Circumcision in Romans 2:17-29

in Novum Testamentum
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The majority of interpreters conclude that in Rom 2:17-29 Paul addresses an ethnic Jew. In contrast, Runar M. Thorsteinsson has argued recently that Paul addresses a gentile, specifically a gentile who has judaized and now thinks of himself as a Jew. This article provides further support for Thorsteinsson’s argument, contending that Paul, contrary to virtually all translations, does not redefine Jewishness in 2:28-29. Additionally, in vv. 21-27 Paul insists that, despite being circumcised, the gentile judaizer fails to keep the very law in which he boasts.

Novum Testamentum

An International Quarterly for New Testament and Related Studies

Sections

References

5

Philip F. Esler, Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul’s Letter (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003) 153. Esler’s translation of Ἰουδαῖος as “Judean” belongs to a recent stream of scholarship that rightly emphasizes the geographical and ethnic aspects inherent in the term. Cf. Steve Mason, “Jews, Judaeans, Judaizing, Judaism: Problems of Categorization in Ancient History,” jsj 38 (2007) 457-512. Nonetheless, following Daniel R. Schwartz (“ ‘Judaean’ or ‘Jew’? How Should We Translate IOUDAIOS in Josephus?” in Jewish Identity in the Greco-Roman World / Jüdische Identität in der griechisch-römischen Welt [ed. Jörg Frey, Daniel R. Schwartz, and Stephanie Gripentrog; agju 71; Leiden: Brill, 2007] 3-27), I believe that rendering the word Ἰουδαῖος in English as “Jew” more accurately captures for the modern reader the same ambiguity that would have faced Paul’s readers when asked what was meant by the Greek term.

9

Robert Jewett, Romans: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007) 236.

12

Stanley K. Stowers, A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews and Gentiles (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994) 155.

16

Barclay, “Paul and Philo on Circumcision,” 546; and Jewett, Romans, 237.

23

Cranfield, Romans, 1:168. Likewise, Gathercole (Where is Boasting? 212) states: “Israel as a nation is subject to the same defilement [as gentiles] because of these three transgressions: stealing, adultery, and robbery of pagan temples.”

26

Watson, Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective (rev. and exp. ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007) 203-205. Campbell (Deliverance of God, 561), for instance, claims that this story “perfectly” explains this passage.

28

Dale B. Martin, The Corinthian Body (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995) 175. Cf. Thorsteinsson, Paul’s Interlocutor, 212.

29

Thorsteinsson, Paul’s Interlocutor, 217-218. He, too, acknowledges that he has “some doubts about the rhetorical effect of such a charge.” On the spectrum of judaizing options, see Shaye J.D. Cohen, The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties (Hellenistic Society and Culture 31; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999) 140-174.

30

Stowers, Rereading Romans, 145.

47

Berkley, From a Broken Covenant, 88.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 15 15 14
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 5 5 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0