Cf. Fowler, “Aristotle,” 98-99.

Cf. Fowler, “Aristotle,” 98-99.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Markovic, “Hyperbaton,” 127-128.

Markovic, “Hyperbaton,” 127-128.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Fraenkel, “Kolon und Satz II,” 93. Fraenkel treated various forms of “clitics” like ἄν and certain pronominal forms as indicators of the start of a colon. It should be noted that some of these enclitic pronominal forms (like οἱ [=αὐτῷ] or σφεων [=αὐτῶν]) are not present in nt Greek—though see clitic µοι, µε, σε, etc. As warrant for this procedure note the statement of Demetrius that asyndeton leads to “disjointed” and “unclear” statements, “For the beginning of each clause [κῶλον] is obscured by the lack of connectives” (Style 192).

Fraenkel, “Kolon und Satz II,” 93. Fraenkel treated various forms of “clitics” like ἄν and certain pronominal forms as indicators of the start of a colon. It should be noted that some of these enclitic pronominal forms (like οἱ [=αὐτῷ] or σφεων [=αὐτῶν]) are not present in nt Greek—though see clitic µοι, µε, σε, etc. As warrant for this procedure note the statement of Demetrius that asyndeton leads to “disjointed” and “unclear” statements, “For the beginning of each clause [κῶλον] is obscured by the lack of connectives” (Style 192).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

So Scheppers, The Colon Hypothesis, 36-38.

So Scheppers, The Colon Hypothesis, 36-38.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

See Dik, Word Order, 7, 72, 79-80.

See Dik, Word Order, 7, 72, 79-80.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

So Devan Matić, “Topic, Focus, and Discourse Structure: Ancient Greek Word Order,” Studies in Language 27 (2003) 573-633 (see p. 577 for hyperbaton). See also S.R. Slings, “Figures of Speech and their Lookalikes: Two Further Exercises in the Pragmatics of the Greek Sentence,” in Grammar As Interpretation: Greek Literature in its Linguistic Contexts (E.J. Bakker, ed.; Leiden, New York, Cologne: Brill, 1997) 169-214, who suggests a “Setting (Orientation)” function be added to Dik’s basic clause structure.

So Devan Matić, “Topic, Focus, and Discourse Structure: Ancient Greek Word Order,” Studies in Language 27 (2003) 573-633 (see p. 577 for hyperbaton). See also S.R. Slings, “Figures of Speech and their Lookalikes: Two Further Exercises in the Pragmatics of the Greek Sentence,” in Grammar As Interpretation: Greek Literature in its Linguistic Contexts (E.J. Bakker, ed.; Leiden, New York, Cologne: Brill, 1997) 169-214, who suggests a “Setting (Orientation)” function be added to Dik’s basic clause structure.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

E.g., Stanley E. Porter, “Ancient Rhetorical Analysis and Discourse Analysis of the Pauline Corpus,” in The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture: Essays from the 1995 London Conference (jsntss, 146; S.E. Porter and T.H. Olbricht, eds.; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997) 249-274; esp. pp. 261-264; Cynthia Long Westfall, A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning(London and New York: T&T Clark, 2005) 25. Westfall critiques Louw’s method because his “concept of the colon and the subjective and the interpretive element involved in determining the structure of the cola are limitations of the method.”

E.g., Stanley E. Porter, “Ancient Rhetorical Analysis and Discourse Analysis of the Pauline Corpus,” in The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture: Essays from the 1995 London Conference (jsntss, 146; S.E. Porter and T.H. Olbricht, eds.; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997) 249-274; esp. pp. 261-264; Cynthia Long Westfall, A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning (London and New York: T&T Clark, 2005) 25. Westfall critiques Louw’s method because his “concept of the colon and the subjective and the interpretive element involved in determining the structure of the cola are limitations of the method.”)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation