Search for other papers by John S. Kloppenborg in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Comparison in the study of religion, in particular the study of the early Jesus movement has had an odd history, serious comparison often being eschewed and dismissed in the interest of preserving claims to the sui generis character of early Christianity. This paper argues that comparison should be regarded as heuristic rather than genealogical, and illustrates this by examining two forms of comparison, analytic and illustrative, in each case mobilizing comparisons of early Pauline groups and their practices with Graeco-Roman associations and the fiscal practices of Greek cities.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 459 | 222 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 448 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 227 | 10 | 0 |
Search for other papers by John S. Kloppenborg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Comparison in the study of religion, in particular the study of the early Jesus movement has had an odd history, serious comparison often being eschewed and dismissed in the interest of preserving claims to the sui generis character of early Christianity. This paper argues that comparison should be regarded as heuristic rather than genealogical, and illustrates this by examining two forms of comparison, analytic and illustrative, in each case mobilizing comparisons of early Pauline groups and their practices with Graeco-Roman associations and the fiscal practices of Greek cities.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 459 | 222 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 448 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 227 | 10 | 0 |
