Post-Hellenistic Philosophy, Neoplatonism, and the Doxastic Turn in Religion: Continuities and Ruptures in Ancient Reflections on Religion
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Tuomo Lankila in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article is inspired by Peter Van Nuffelen’s comparison between post-Hellenistic philosophy and Neoplatonism. The article defends the thesis of a fundamental break between ancient religions and new universal religions which became prevalent at the end of late antiquity. This break concerns not only fundamental doctrines but also the principles of how religious communities were constituted. There was a shift from the world of practice-oriented and reciprocally recognizing cults to the world of exclusive theocracies whose mindset emphasizes doctrinal confession. Some seeds of such a “doxastic turn” are to be seen in the post-Hellenistic philosophy and especially in the dogmatic tendencies of Middle Platonism. Thus, there is an observable route from the post-Hellenistic thought towards late ancient universal religions.
Neoplatonism’s role in this historical drama is not that of precursor but, rather, it represents a deviation from the main line.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Athanassiadi Polymnia Vers la pensée unique: la montée de l’intolerance dans l’Antiquité tardive 2010 Paris Les Belles Lettres
-
Bidez Joseph Catalogue des manuscrits alchimiques grecs 1928 vol. 6 Brussels M. Lamertin
-
Boissonade Jean François Marinus Vita Procli 1966 [1814] Amsterdam Hakkert
-
Brisson Luc How Philosophers Saved Myths: Allegorical Interpretation and Classical Mythology 2004 Chicago Chicago University Press
-
Butler Edward “The Gods and Being in Proclus.” Dionysius 2008 26 93 114
-
Combès Joseph “Négativité et procession des principes chez Damascius.” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 1976 22 1–2 114 133
-
Cousin Victor Procli Commentarium in Platonis Parmenidem 1961 [1861] Hildesheim G. Olms
-
des Places Édouard Oracles chaldaïques 1971 Paris Les Belles Lettres
-
Diehl Ernst Procli Diadochi in Platonis Timaeum commentaria 1965 [1903–1906] 3 vols Amsterdam Hakkert
-
Dillon John Gerson Lloyd P. “Iamblichus of Chalcis and his School.” The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity 2010 Vol. 1 Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 358–374
-
Dodds Eric R. Proclus, The Elements of Theology 1963 2nd ed. Oxford Clarendon Press
-
Erler Michael Kobusch Theo & Erler Michael “Hilfe der Götter und Erkenntnis des Selbst: Sokrates als Göttergeschenk bei Platon und den Platonikern.” Metaphysik und Religion: Zur Signatur des Spätantiken Denkens 2006 Munich K. G. Saur 387 414
-
Friedlein Gottfried Proclus, In primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii 1967 [1873] Hildesheim Olms
-
Gerson Lloyd P. Plotinus 1994 London Routledge
-
Gersh Stephen From Iamblichus to Eriugena 1978 Leiden Brill
-
Hoffmann Philippe Segonds Alain-Philippe & Steel Carlos “La triade chaldaïque ἔρως, ἀλήθεια, πίστις: De Proclus à Simplicius.” Proclus et la Théologie platonicienne 2000 Leuven Leuven University Press 446 459
-
Kroll Wilhelm Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii 1965 [1899–1901] 2 vols Amsterdam Hakkert
-
Lloyd Anthony C. The Anatomy of Neoplatonism 1990 Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Nikulin Dmitri “Imagination and Mathematics in Proclus.” Ancient Philosophy 2008 28 153 172
-
O’Meara Dominic J. Perler Dominik “Intentional Object in Later Neoplatonism.” Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality 2001 Leiden Brill 115 125
-
Pasquali Giorgio (ed.) Procli Diadochi in Platonis Cratylum commentaria 1908 Leipzig Teubner
-
Saffrey Henri-Dominique & Westerink Leendert G. Proclus: Théologie platonicienne 1968–1997 6 vols Paris Les Belles Lettres
-
Smith Andrew Plotinus, Porphyry and Iamblichus: Philosophy and Religion in Neoplatonism 2011 Farnham Ashgate
-
Steel Carlos Cleary John J. “Breathing Thought: Proclus on the Innate Knowledge of the Soul.” The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism 1997 Leuven Leuven University Press 293 309
-
Tornau Christian von Perkamps Matthias & Piccione Rosa Maria “Das Eros und das Gute bei Plotin und Proklos.” Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik 2006 Leiden Brill 201 229
-
Trouillard Jean La mystagogie de Proclos 1982 Paris Les Belles Lettres
-
Van Nuffelen Peter Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period 2011 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
-
Wallis Richard T. Neoplatonism 1972 London Duckworth
-
Westerink Leendert G. Proclus Diadochus: Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato 1954 Amsterdam North-Holland Publishing Co
-
Westerink Leendert G. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo: Volume i: Olympiodorus 1976 Amsterdam North-Holland Publishing Company
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 508 | 119 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 243 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 92 | 7 | 0 |
Post-Hellenistic Philosophy, Neoplatonism, and the Doxastic Turn in Religion: Continuities and Ruptures in Ancient Reflections on Religion
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Tuomo Lankila in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article is inspired by Peter Van Nuffelen’s comparison between post-Hellenistic philosophy and Neoplatonism. The article defends the thesis of a fundamental break between ancient religions and new universal religions which became prevalent at the end of late antiquity. This break concerns not only fundamental doctrines but also the principles of how religious communities were constituted. There was a shift from the world of practice-oriented and reciprocally recognizing cults to the world of exclusive theocracies whose mindset emphasizes doctrinal confession. Some seeds of such a “doxastic turn” are to be seen in the post-Hellenistic philosophy and especially in the dogmatic tendencies of Middle Platonism. Thus, there is an observable route from the post-Hellenistic thought towards late ancient universal religions.
Neoplatonism’s role in this historical drama is not that of precursor but, rather, it represents a deviation from the main line.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 508 | 119 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 243 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 92 | 7 | 0 |
