Anthropology and Historiography: A Deconstructive Analysis of K. C. Chang’s Shamanic Approach in Chinese Archaeology
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Feng Qu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The hypothesis of ancient Chinese shamanism popularized by K. C. Chang in the 1980s has long been one of the central problems in the study of Chinese archaeology. By examining the structures that constitute Chang’s shamanic framework, this article argues that the problem centers around two major issues. The first is that Chang follows a tradition in Chinese academic historiography of using late historical texts to interpret Neolithic and Bronze Age materials. The second is that, in order to explore the dynamics of the formation of Chinese civilization, he employs Western theories in his construction of the history of shamanism. This article discusses the problems associated with using textual materials for interpretations of archaeological finds. It also discusses “substratum theory,” the way in which it influenced Chang’s understanding of shamanic civilization, and the manner in which Western anthropological theory was incorporated into Chang’s historiographical model. Accordingly, the author concludes that this shamanism problem in Chinese archaeology actually stems from a mixture of the Chinese historiographical tradition and Western anthropological theories, which together make Chang’s writing develop a meta-narrative that leads directly to two characteristics: generalization and polymorphism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Boas, Franz. 1927. Primitive Art. Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning, Series B, Vol. 8. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.
-
Bodde, Derk. 1961. “Myths of Ancient China.” In S. N. Kramer (ed.), Mythologies of the Ancient World, Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 369–408.
-
Boileau, Gilles 2002. “Wu and Shaman.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 65(2): 350–378.
-
Borić, Dušan. 2007. “Images of Animality: Hybrid Bodies and Mimesis in Early Prehistoric Art.” In Colin Renfrew and Iain Morley (eds.), Image and Imagination, Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, 83–99.
-
Campbell, Joseph. 1959. The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology. New York: The Viking Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1963. The Archeology of Ancient China. 1st ed. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1967. Rethinking Archaeology. New York: Random House.
-
Chang, K. C. 1968a. Settlement Archaeology. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.
-
Chang, K. C. 1968b. The Archeology of Ancient China. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1972. Early Chinese Civilization: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1977. The Archeology of Ancient China, 3rd ed., New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1980. Shang Civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. 1981a. “The Animal in Shang and Chou Bronze Art.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 41(2): 527–554.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1981b. “Shang Zhou Qingtongqi shang de dongwu wenyang 商周青铜器上的动物纹样.” Kaogu yu wenwu 考古与文物 2: 53–68.
-
Chang, K. C. 1981c. “Archaeology and Chinese Historiography.” World Archaeology 13(2): 156–169.
-
Chang, K. C. 1983a. Art, Myth, and Ritual: The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1983b. “Zhongguo gudai yishu yu zhengzhi: xulun Shang Zhou qingtongqi shang de dongwu huoban 中国古代艺术与政治：续论商周青铜器上的动物伙伴.” Xinya xueshu jikan 新亚学术季刊 Vol. 4: 29–35.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1986a. Kaoguxue zhuanti liu jiang 考古学专题六讲. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.
-
Chang, K. C. 1986b. The Archeology of Ancient China. 4th ed. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直). 1986c. “Tan ‘cong’ jiqi zai zhongguo gushi shang de yiyi 谈‘琮’及其在中国古史上的意义,” ed. Wenwu chubanshe, Wenwu yu kaogu lunji 文物与考古论集, Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 252–260.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直). 1986d. “Lianxu yu polie: yige wenming qiyuan xinshuo de caogao 连续与破裂：一个文明起源新说的草稿.” Jiuzhou xuekan 九洲学刊 Vol. 1: 1–8.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1987. “Cong Shang Zhou qingtongqi tan wenming yu guojia de qiyuan 从商周青铜器谈文明与国家的起源.” Renleixue luncong 人类学论丛 Vol. 1: 10–24.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1988. “Puyang sanjiao yu zhongguo gudai meishu shang de renshou muti 濮阳三蹻与中国古代美术上的人兽母题.” Wenwu 文物, 11: 36–39.
-
Chang, K. C. 1989a. “Ancient China and Its Anthropological Significance.” In C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–166.
-
Chang, K. C. 1989b. “An Essay on Cong.” Orientations 20(6): 37–43.
-
Chang, K. C. 1990a. “The ‘Meaning’ of Shang Bronze Art.” Asian Art 3(2): 9–17.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1990b. “Shangdai de wu yu wushu 商代的巫与巫术.” In Zhang Guangzhi 张光直, Zhongguo qingtong shidai 中国青铜时代, Beijing: Sanlian shudian, Vol. 2: 39–66.
-
Chang, K. C. 1992. “The Circumpacific Substratum of Ancient Chinese Civilization.” In C. M. Rhee and S. N. Rhee (eds.), Pacific Northeast Asia in Prehistory, Seattle: Washington State University Press, 217–221.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1994a. “Yangshao wenhua de wuxi ziliao 仰韶文化的巫觋资料.” Zhongyang yanjiuyuan minzuxue yanjiusuo jikan 中央研究院民族研究所季刊 63(3): 253–268.
-
Chang, K. C. 1994b. “Ritual and Power.” In R. E. Murowchick (ed.), Cradles of Civilization–China: Ancient Culture, Modern Land, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 61–69.
-
Chang, K. C. 1999a. “China on the Eve of the Historical Period.” In M. Loewe-Edward and L. Shaughnessy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient China, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–73.
-
Chang, K. C. (Zhang Guangzhi 张光直) . 1999b. “Kaoguxue yu ruhe jianshe juyou zhongguo tese de renleixue 考古学与如何建设具有中国特色的人类学.” In Zhang Guangzhi 张光直, Zhongguo kaoguxue lunwenji 中国考古学论文集, Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1–9.
-
Chen, Chun 陈淳 and Yin, Min 殷敏. 2005. “Sanxingdui qingtongshu xiangzhenxing yanjiu 三星堆青铜树象征性研究.” Sichun wenwu 四川文物, 6: 38–44.
-
Chen, Mengjia 陈梦家. 1936. “Shangdai de shenhua yu wushu 商代的神话与巫术.” Yanjing xuebao 燕京学报 20: 485–576.
-
Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. 1995. “The Ghost Head Mask and Metamorphic Shang Imagery.” Early China 20: 79–92.
-
Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. 1998. “The Metamorphic Image: A Predominant Theme in the Ritual Art of Shang China.” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 70: 5–171.
-
Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth. 2008. The Meaning of the Graph Yi 異 and Its Implications for Shang Belief and Art. East Asia Journal Monograph. London: Saffron Press.
-
Ching, Julia. 1997. Mysticism and Kinship in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Creel, Herrlee G. 1935. “On the Origins of the Manufacture and Decoration of Bronze in the Shang Period.” Monumenta Serica 1(1): 36–69.
-
Deng, Shuping 邓淑萍. 1985. Zhonghua wuqiannian wenwu jikan: Yuqipian 中华五千年文物集刊, Vol. 1. Taibei: National Palace Museum.
-
Eliade, Mircea. 1964. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Falkenhausen, Lothar von. 1995. “Reflection on the Political Role of Spirit Mediums in Early China: The Wu Officials in the Zhouli.” Early China 20: 279–300.
-
Francfort, Henri-Paul. 2001. “Art, Archaeology and the prehistories of Shamnism in Inner Asia.” In Henri-Paul Francfort and Roberte N. Hamayon (eds.), The Concept of Shamanism: Uses and Abuses, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 243–276
-
Freidel, David, Linda Schele, and Joy Parker. 1993. Maya Cosmos: Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path. New York: Morrow.
-
Furst, Peter T. 1973–1974. “The Roots and Continuities of Shamanism.” Arts Canada Vol. 184–187: 33–60.
-
Furst, Peter T. 1976. “Shamanistic Survivals in Mesoamerican Religion.” Actas, XLI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, México, 2 al 7 de septiembre de 1974 Vol. 2: 151–157.
-
Gilberg, R. 1984. “How to Recognize a Shaman among Other Religious Specialists?” In Mihály Hoppál (ed.), Shamanism in Eurasia, Part 1, Göttingen: Edition Herodot, 21–27.
-
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1991. Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath. New York: Pantheon.
-
Guo, Dashun 郭大顺. 2008. “Hongshan wenhua ‘yuwuren’ de faxian yu ‘samanshi wenming’ de youguan wenti 红山文化’玉巫人’的发现与’萨满式文明’的有关问题.” Wenwu 文物, 11: 80–96.
-
Guo, Shuyun. 2013. “The History of Research on Shamanism in China from 1930 to 2010.” Shaman 21(1–2): 135–161.
-
Hamada, Sosaku 滨田耕作. 1971. “Youzhuzai cang duyu pu 有竹斋藏古玉谱.” Taibei: Taiwan zhonghua shuju.
-
Hamayon, Roberte N. 1993. “Shamanism and Pragmatism in Siberia.” In Mihály Hoppál and Keith D. Howard (eds.), Shamans and Cultures, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 200–205.
-
Hamayon, Roberte N. 1994. “Shamanism in Siberia: From Partnership in Supernature to Counter-power in Society.” In Nicholas Thomas and Caroline Humphrey (eds.), Shamanism, History, and the State, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 76–89.
-
Hentze, Carl. 1960–1963. “Eine Schamanentracht in ihrer Bedeutung für die altchinesische Kunst und Religion.” Jahrbuch für prähistorische und ethnographische Kunst 20: 53–61.
-
Hopkins, L. C. 1945. “The Shaman or Chinese Wu: His Inspired Dancing and Versatile Character.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1: 3–16.
-
Hultkrantz, Åke. 1973. “A Definition of Shamanism.” Temenos 9: 25–37.
-
Hultkrantz, Åke. 1978. “Ecological and Phenomenological Aspects of Shamanism.” In Vilmos Diószegi and Mihály Hoppál (eds.), Shamanism in Siberia, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.27–58.
-
Hultkrantz, Åke. 1989. “The Place of Shamanism in the History of Religions.” In Mihály Hoppál and Otto von Sadovszky (eds.), Shamanism: Past and Present, Budapest: Ethnographic Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1: 43–52.
-
Humphrey, Caroline. 1994. “Shamanic Practices and the State in Northern Asia: Views from the Center and Periphery.” In Nicholas Thomas and Caroline Humphrey (eds.), Shamanism, History, and the State, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 191–230.
-
Kappelman, Julia Guernsey. 2001. “Sacred Geography at Izapa and the Performance of Rulership.” In Rex Koontz, Katherine Reese-Taylor, and Annabeth Headrick (eds.), Landscape and Power in Ancient Mesoamerica, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 81–111.
-
Kehoe, Alice B. 2000. Shamans and Religion: An Anthropological Exploration in Critical Thinking. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
-
Keightley, David N. 1995. “Chinese Religions 4000 B.C.E. to 200 C.E.: Neolithic and Shang Periods.” Journal of Asian Studies 54 (1): 124–134.
-
Keightley, David N. 1998. “Shamanism, Death, and the Ancestors: Religious Mediation in Neolithic and Shang China (ca. 5000–1000 B.C.).” Asiatische Studien 52: 763–830.
-
Kesner, Ladislav. 1991. “The taotie Reconsidered: Meanings and Functions of Shang Theriomorphic Imagery.” Artibus Siae 51(1/2): 29–53.
-
Klein, Cecelia F., Eulogio Guzmán, Elisa C. Mandell, and Maya Stanfield-Mazzi. 2002. “The Role of Shamanism in Mesoamerican Art.” Current Anthropology 43(3): 383–419.
-
Kósa, Gábor. 2000. “In Search of the Spirits: Shamanism in China before the Tang Dynasty, Part I.” Shaman 8(2): 131–179.
-
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. New York and London: Basic Books.
-
Lewis, I. M. 1971. Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
-
Lewis-Williams, J. D., and T. A. Dowson. 1988. “Signs of All Times: Entoptic Phenomena in Upper Paleolithic Art.” Current Anthropology 29(2): 201–245.
-
Lewis-Williams, J. D., and T. A. Dowson. 1993. “On Visions and Power in the Neolithic: Evidence from the Decorated Monuments.” Current Anthropology 34(1): 55–65.
-
Li, Xueqin 李学勤, 1994. Zouchu yigu shidai 走出疑古时代. Shenyang, China: Liaoning daxue chubanshe
-
Liberty, Margot P. 1970. “Priest and Shaman on the Plains: A False Dichotomy?” Plains Anthropologist 15(48): 73–79.
-
Liu, Bin, and Xiangming Fang. 2007. “The Liangzhu Culture.” In Tianlong Jiao (ed.) Lost Maritime Cultures: China and the Pacific, Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press, 148–183.
-
Lommel, Andreas. 1966a. Shamanism: The Beginning of Art. New York: McGraw-Hill Books.
-
Lommel, Andreas. 1966b. Prehistoric and Primitive Man. New York: McGraw-Hill Books.
-
Lommel, Andreas. 1967. The World of the Early Hunters. London: Evelyn, Adams & Mackay.
-
Lowie, Robert H. 1954. Indians of the Plains. Anthropological Handbook No. 1, The American Museum of Natural History. New York, Toronto, and London: McGraw-Hill Books.
-
Mathieu, Rémi. 1987. “Chamanes et chamanisme en Chine ancienne.” L’Homme 27: 10–34.
-
McCall, Grant S. 2007. “Add Shamans and Stir? A Critical Review of the Shamanism Model of Forager Rock Art Production.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26: 224–233.
-
Michael, Thomas. 2015. “Shamanism Theory and the Early Chinese Wu.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 83(3): 649–696.
-
Mote, Frederick W. 1971. Intellectual Foundations of China. New York: Knopf.
-
Noll, Richard. 1985. “Mental Imagery Cultivation as a Cultural Phenomenon: The Role of Visions in Shamanism.” Current Anthropology 26(4): 443–461.
-
Paper, Jordan. 1978. “Meaning of the ‘T’ao-T’ieh’.” History of Religions 18(1): 18–41.
-
Pharo, Lars K. 2011. “A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts ‘Shaman’ and ‘Shamanism’.” Numen 58: 6–70.
-
Price, Neil. 2001. “An Archaeology of Altered States: Shamanism and Material Culture Studies.” In Neil Price (ed.), The Archaeology of Shamanism, London and New York: Routledge, 3–16.
-
Puett, Michael J. 2002. To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Rong, Geng 容庚. 1941. Shangzhou yiqi tong kao 商周彝器通考. Yanjing xuebao zhuankan, Vol. 17. Beijing: Harvard-Yanjing xueshe.
-
Rong, Guanxiong 容观敻. 1993. “Dongshanzui Hongshan wenhua jisi yizhi yu woguo gudai beifang minzu de samanjiao xinyang 东山嘴红山文化祭祀遗址与我国古代北方民族的萨满教信仰.” Minzu yanjiu 民族研究 1: 38–40.
-
Reilly, F. Kent, III. 1989. “The Shaman in Transformation Pose: A Study of the Theme of Rulership in Olmec Art.” Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University 48(2): 4–21.
-
Schafer, Edward H. 1951. “Ritual Exposure in Ancient China.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 14(1–2): 130–184.
-
Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Shao, Paul. 1983. The Origins of Ancient American Cultures. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
-
Siikala, Anna-Leena. 1978. The Rite Technique of the Siberian Shaman. Helsinki: Suomalainen tiedeakatemia.
-
Song, Feng 宋峰. 2011. “Taishang dengzhen sanjiao lingyingjing de sixiang yu jiazhi 《太上登真三矫灵应经》的思想与价值.” Hongdao 弘道 48(3): 37–44.
-
Song, Zhaolin 宋兆麟. 2001. “Zhongguo shiqian kaogu faxian de saman yiji 中国史前考古发现的萨满遗迹.” Heilongjiang minzu congkan 黑龙江民族丛刊 64(1): 78–84.
-
Sukhu, Gopal. 2012. The Shaman and the Heresiarch: A New Interpretation of the Li Sao. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
-
Sun, Qigang 孙其刚. 1990. “Shenqi de samanjiao gugeshi yishu 神奇的萨满教骨骼式艺术.” Wenwu tiandi 文物天地 6: 40–43.
-
Sun, Qigang 孙其刚. 1994. “Samanjiao guge yishu de hanyi 萨满教骨骼艺术的含义.” Zhongguo guojia bowuguan guankan 中国国家博物馆馆刊 1: 98–103.
-
Tedlock, Barbara. 1992. Time and the Highland Maya. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
-
Tong Enzheng. 2002. “Magicians, Magic, and Shamanism in Ancient China.” Journal of East Asian Archaeology 4(1–4): 27–73.
-
Turner, Victor W. 1968. “Religious Specialists: Anthropological Study.” In D. L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan and Free Press, Vol. 13: 439.
-
Waley, Arthur. 1955. The Nine Songs: A Study of Shamanism in Ancient China. London: Allen & Unwin.
-
Winkelman, Michael. 1990. “Shamans and Other ‘Magio-Religious’ Healers: A Cross-Cultural Study of Their Origins, Nature, and Social Transformations.” Ethos 8(3): 308–352.
-
Winkelman, Michael. 1992. Shamans, Priests, and Witches: A Cross-Cultural Study of Magico-Religious Practitioners. Anthropological Research Papers, 44. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
-
Winkelman, Michael. 2010. Shamanism: A Biopsychological Paradigm of Consciousness and Healing. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
-
Wu, Ruzuo 吴汝祚. 2005. “Zhongguo gudai wenming yu wu 中国古代文明与巫.” In Gudai wenming yanjiu 古代文明研究, ed. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo, Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe, Vol. 1: 4–29.
-
Xiao, Bing 萧兵. 2006. “Zhongguo shanggu wenwu zhong ren yu dongwu de guanxi 中国上古文物中人与动物的关系.” Shehui kexue 社会科学 1: 172–179.
-
Yang, Boda 杨伯达. 2006. “Liangzhu wenhua Yaoshan yu shenqi fenhua ji wu quan tiaozheng zhi tantao良渚文化瑶山玉神器分化信巫权调整之探讨.” Gugong bowuyuan yuankan 127(5): 6–25.
-
Yang, Jianfang 杨建芳. 1990. “Yuzong zhi yanjiu 玉琮之研究.” Kaogu yu wenwu 考古与文物, 2: 58–67.
-
Zhang, Hai 张海. 2011. “Zhongguo kaoguxue de lishi zhuyi tezheng yu chuantong 中国考古学的历史主义特征与传统.” Huaxia kaogu 华夏考古 , 4: 137–145, 150.
-
Zhang, Minghua 张明华. 1990. “Liangzhu yufu shitan 良渚玉符试探.” Wenwu 文物, 12: 32–36.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 611 | 130 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 542 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 341 | 8 | 0 |
Anthropology and Historiography: A Deconstructive Analysis of K. C. Chang’s Shamanic Approach in Chinese Archaeology
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Feng Qu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The hypothesis of ancient Chinese shamanism popularized by K. C. Chang in the 1980s has long been one of the central problems in the study of Chinese archaeology. By examining the structures that constitute Chang’s shamanic framework, this article argues that the problem centers around two major issues. The first is that Chang follows a tradition in Chinese academic historiography of using late historical texts to interpret Neolithic and Bronze Age materials. The second is that, in order to explore the dynamics of the formation of Chinese civilization, he employs Western theories in his construction of the history of shamanism. This article discusses the problems associated with using textual materials for interpretations of archaeological finds. It also discusses “substratum theory,” the way in which it influenced Chang’s understanding of shamanic civilization, and the manner in which Western anthropological theory was incorporated into Chang’s historiographical model. Accordingly, the author concludes that this shamanism problem in Chinese archaeology actually stems from a mixture of the Chinese historiographical tradition and Western anthropological theories, which together make Chang’s writing develop a meta-narrative that leads directly to two characteristics: generalization and polymorphism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 611 | 130 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 542 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 341 | 8 | 0 |
