This article aims to analyze how scholars of religions have studied the history of the discipline itself, with particular emphasis on the question of its beginning. Although situating the beginning of the discipline in the late 19th century is prevalent, there are dissenting voices in this debate. Interestingly, a similar discussion exists in the history of science. There, Andrew Cunningham has argued in favor of understanding scientific practice as a human activity and thus writing histories of science as histories of an activity. The latter part of this article explains how implementing Cunningham’s approach can be useful for the study of the history of religious studies, making it possible to study the intellectual and institutional aspects as parts of one whole. I will draw attention to how this approach can help us analyze the question of the beginnings of the discipline.
Bubík, Tomáš. 2015. “The Czech Journey to the Academic Study of Religions: From the Critique of Religion to its Study.” In TomášBubík and HenrykHoffmann (eds.), Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened, Leiden: Brill, 1–54.
Despland, Michel. 1998. “Sciences of Religion in France during the July Monarchy (1830–1848).” In Arie L.Molendijk and PeterPels (eds.), Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion, Leiden: Brill, 31–43.
Václavík, David. 2015. “Searching and Finding: A History of the Slovak Study of Religion.” In TomášBubík and HenrykHoffmann (eds.), Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened, Leiden: Brill, 55–86.
Valk, Ülo, and TarmoKulmar. 2015. “Estonian Study of Religion: A Historical Outline of the 20th Century Developments.” In TomášBubík and HenrykHoffmann (eds.), Studying Religions with the Iron Curtain Closed and Opened, Leiden: Brill, 166–198.