Who Owns Religion? Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Cultural Appropriation in Postglobal Buddhism
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Jørn Borup in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
While historically sharing the characteristics of a universalistic religion and a modernist grand narrative, global Buddhism is mainly the product of a late modern development. Centripetal forces with circulating ideas, practices, and institutions have been part of a liberal market in an open exchange society with “open hermeneutics” and an accessible universal grammar. Its global focus has triggered de-ethnification, de-culturalization, and de-territorialization, claiming transnational universality as a central paradigm fit for a global world beyond isolationalist particularism. However, such seemingly universalist versions of a global Buddhism in recent years, mainly in North America, have been criticized for actually being representations of particular cultures (e.g., “white Buddhism”) with benefits for only particular segments. This article investigates the discourses of this new turn, involving questions of authority, authenticity, identity, cultural appropriation, and representation. It is suggested that criticism of global Buddhism should be seen as typical of what could be called “postglobal Buddhism,” in which identity politics is a frame of reference serving as a centrifugal force, signaling a new phase in “Western Buddhism.” The relevance for the study of religion is further discussed with reflections on how to respond to post-global religious identity politics without being consumed by either stark objectivism or subjectivist go-nativism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aktor, Mikael. 2015. “Asymmetrical Religious Commitments? Religious Practice, Identity, and Self-Presentation among Western Scholars of Hinduism and Buddhism.” Numen 62: 265–300.
-
Amstutz, Galen. 2014. “Global Communication versus Ethno-Chauvinism: Framing Nikkei Pure Land Buddhism in North America.” Journal of Religion in Japan 3: 141–176.
-
Antony, Mary Grace. 2014. “‘It’s Not Religious, But It’s Spiritual’: Appropriation and the Universal Spirituality of Yoga.” Journal of Communication and Religion 37(4): 63–81.
-
Baldoquin, Hilda G. (ed.). 2004. Dharma, Color, and Culture: New Voices in Western Buddhism. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.
-
Baumann, Martin. 2001. “Global Buddhism: Developmental Periods, Regional Histories, and a New Analytical Perspective.” Journal of Global Buddhism 2: 1–43.
-
Berkwitz, Steven. 2008. “Resisting the Global in Buddhist Nationalism: Venerable Soma’s Discourse of Decline and Reform.” Journal of Asian Studies 67(1): 73–106.
-
Beyer, Peter. 1994. Religion and Globalization. London: Sage.
-
Blezer, Henk, and Mark Teeuwen. 2013. Challenging Paradigms: Buddhism and Nativism: Framing Identity Discourse in Buddhist Environments. Leiden: Brill.
-
Bocking, Brian, Phibul Choompolpaisal, Laurence Cox, and Alicia Turner (eds.). 2015. A Buddhist Crossroads: Pioneer European Buddhists and Globalizing Asian Networks 1860–1960. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Borup, Jørn. 2013. “Aloha Buddha: The Secularization of Ethnic Japanese-American Buddhism.” Journal of Global Buddhism 14: 23–43.
-
Borup, Jørn. 2016. “Branding Buddha: Mediatized and Commodified Buddhism as Cultural Narrative.” Journal of Global Buddhism 17: 41–55.
-
Borup, Jørn. 2018. “Prosperous Buddhism, Prosperity Buddhism, and Religious Capital.” Numen 65(2–3): 256–288.
-
Borup, Jørn, and Marianne Q. Fibiger. 2017. Eastspirit: Transnational Spirituality and Religious Circulation in East and West. Leiden: Brill.
-
Brown, Michael F. 2004. Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Cabezón, José Ignacio. 1998. “Scholarship as Interreligious Dialogue.” Buddhist-Christian Studies 18: 89–95.
-
Cabezón, José Ignacio. 2004. “Identity and the Work of the Scholar of Religion.” In José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney (eds.), Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, 43–59.
-
Cabezón, José Ignacio, and Sheila Greeve Davaney. 2004. “Introduction.” In José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney (eds.), Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, 1–24.
-
Campbell, Bradley, and Jason Manning. 2018. The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Carrette, Jeremy, and Richard King. 2005. Selling Spirituality: The Silent Takeover of Religion. London: Routledge.
-
Cheah, Joseph. 2011. Race and Religion in American Buddhism: White Supremacy and Immigrant Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Cheah, Joseph. 2017. “US Buddhist Traditions.” In M. Jerryson (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 316–331.
-
Cho, Francisca. 2004. “Religious Identity and the Study of Buddhism.” In José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney (eds.), Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, 61–76.
-
Cochran, Tracy. 2004. “Does Race Matter in the Meditation Hall?” Tricycle (Fall). URL: https://tricycle.org/magazine/does-race-matter-meditation-hall/.
-
Coombe, Rosemary J. 1997. “The Properties of Culture and the Possession of Identity: Postcolonial Struggle and the Legal Imagination.” In Bruce Ziff and P. R. Rao (eds.), Borrowed Power: Essays on Cultural Appropriation, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers 74–96.
-
Cox, James L. 2014. The Invention of God in Indigenous Societies. Durham: Acumen.
-
Cox, Laurence. 2013. “Rethinking Early Western Buddhists: Beachcombers, Going Native and Dissident Orientalism.” Contemporary Buddhism 14: 116–133.
-
Crowley, Karlyn. 2011. Feminism’s New Age: Gender, Appropriation, and the Afterlife of Essentialism. New York: State University of New York Press.
-
Csordas, Thomas J. (ed.). 2009. Transnational Transcendence: Essays on Religion and Globalization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Doniger, Wendy. 2016. “The Repression of Religious Studies.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20 April. URL: https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Repression-of-Religious/236166.
-
Eaton, Joshua. 2014. “Gentrifying the Dharma: How the 1 Percent is Hijacking Mindfulness.” salon.com, 5 March. URL: https://www.salon.com/2014/03/05/gentrifying_the_dharma_how_the_1_is_hijacking_mindfulness/.
-
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2007. Globalization: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.
-
Fields, Rick. 1998. “Divided Dharma: White Buddhists, Ethnic Buddhists and Racism.” In Charles S. Prebish and Kenneth Kenichi Tanaka (eds.), The Faces of Buddhism in America, Berkeley: University of California Press, 196–206.
-
Foley, Michael W., and Dean R. Hoge. 2007. Religion and the New Immigrants: Social Capital, Identity, and Civic Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Fukuyama, Francis. 2018. Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition, London: Profile Books.
-
Gleig, Ann. 2019. American Buddhism After Modernity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Gold, J. B. 2011. “A Critical Glimpse at the American Appropriation of Asian Meditative Traditions: Confessions of an Unsuccessful Meditator.” The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society 1(2): 139–148.
-
Gross, Rita M. 2004. “Religious Identity, Scholarship, and Teaching Religion.” In José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney (eds.), Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge: 113–132.
-
Gutterman, David S., and Andrew R. Murphy. 2016. Political Religion and Religious Politics: Navigating Identities in the United States. New York: Routledge.
-
Halafoff, Anna, and Praveena Rajkobal. 2015. “Sakyadhita International: Gender Equity in Ultramodern Buddhism.” Feminist Theology 23(2): 111–127.
-
Han, Chenxing. 2017. “Diverse Practices and Flexible Beliefs among Young Asian American Buddhists.” Journal of Global Buddhism 18: 1–24.
-
Han, Chenxing. 2017. “We’re Not Who You Think We Are.” Lion’s Roar, 15 May. URL: https://www.lionsroar.com/were-not-who-you-think-we-are/.
-
Heine, Steven. 2008. Zen Skin, Zen Marrow: Will the Real Zen Buddhism Please Stand Up? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Helderman, Ira. 2019. Prescribing the Dharma: Psychotherapists, Buddhist Traditions, and Defining Religion. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
-
Hershock, Peter D. 2014. “Squaring Freedom with Equity: Challenging the Karma of the Globalization of Choice.” In Leah Kalmanson and James Mark Shields (eds.), Buddhist Responses to Globalization, London: Lexington Books, 15–28.
-
Hickey, Wakoh Shannon. 2010. “Two Buddhisms, Three Buddhisms, and Racism.” Journal of Global Buddhism 11: 1–25.
-
Hollinger, David. 2013. After Cloven Tongues of Fire: Protestant Liberalism in Modern American History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Horii, Mitsutoshi. 2018. The Category of Religion in Contemporary Japan: Shūkyō & Temple Buddhism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Hsu, Funie. 2017. “We’ve Been Here All Along.” Lion’s Roar, 17 May. URL: https://www.lionsroar.com/weve-been-here-all-along/.
-
Hughes, Aaron. 2015. Islam and the Tyranny of Authenticity: An Inquiry into Disciplinary Apologetics and Self-Deception. Sheffield: Equinox.
-
Iwamura, Jane Naomi. 2011. Virtual Orientalism: Asian Religions and American Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Jain, Andrea. 2015. Selling Yoga: From Counterculture to Pop Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Jenkins, Tiffany. 2016. Keeping Their Marbles: How the Treasures of the Past Ended Up in Museums … and Why They Should Stay There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Jerryson, Michael. 2018. If You Meet the Buddha on the Road: Buddhism, Politics, and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Jiménez, Tomás R. 2010. “Affiliative Ethnic Identity: A More Elastic Link between Ethnic Ancestry and Culture.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(10): 1756–1775.
-
Joy, Morny. 2007. “Method and Theory in Religious Studies: Retrospect and Prognostications.” Temenos 43(2): 199–222.
-
Kleisath, C. Michelle. 2014. “The Costume of Shangri-La: Thoughts on White Privilege, Cultural Appropriation, and Anti-Asian Racism.” Journal of Lesbian Studies 18: 142–157.
-
Konchok, Pema. 2002. “Buddhism as a Focus of Iconoclash in Asia.” In Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel (eds.), Iconoclash: The Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 40–59.
-
Kripal, Jeffrey J. 2004. “Being John Woodroffe: Some Mythical Reflections on the Postcolonial Study of Hindu Tantra.” In José Ignacio Cabezón and Sheila Greeve Davaney (eds.), Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York: Routledge, 183–208.
-
Lewis, Craig. 2017. “China Clamps Down on For-Profit Buddhism.” Buddhistdoor.net, 14 December. URL: https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/china-clamps-down-on-for-profit-buddhism.
-
Makransky, John. 2008. “The Emergence of Buddhist Critical-Constructive Reflection in the Academy as a Resource for Buddhist Communities and for the Contemporary World.” Journal of Global Buddhism 9: 113–153.
-
McDaniel, Justin Thomas. 2016. Architects of Buddhist Leisure: Socially Disengaged Buddhism in Asia’s Museums, Monuments, and Amusement Parks. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
-
McMahan, David L., and Erik Braun (eds.). 2017. Meditation, Buddhism, and Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
McNicholl, Adeana. 2018a. “Buddhism and Race.” In Kathryn Gin Lum and Paul Harvey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Race in American History, New York: Oxford University Press, 223–240.
-
McNicholl, Adeana. 2018b. “Being Buddha, Staying Woke: Racial Formation in Black Buddhist Writing.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86(4): 883–911.
-
Mitchell, Scott. 2016. Buddhism in America: Global Religion, Local Contexts. London: Bloomsbury.
-
Mitchell, Scott. 2017. “The Stories We Tell: The Study and Practice of Jōdo Shinshū Buddhism.” Pacific World 19: 81–97.
-
Ng, Edwin, and Ron Purser. 2015. “White Privilege and the Mindfulness Movement.” Buddhist Peace Fellowship, 2 October. URL: http://www.buddhistpeacefellowship.org/white-privilege-the-mindfulness-movement/.
-
Nye, Malory. 2018. “Whiteness, Religion, and Modernity.” Religious Bites blog, 28 August. URL: https://medium.com/religion-bites/whiteness-religion-and-modernity-64729dc21e8e.
-
Oliver, Brent R. 2014. “White Trash Buddhist.” Tricycle, Fall. URL: https://tricycle.org/magazine/white-trash-buddhist/.
-
Paramasivam, Shamala, and Shanta Nair-Venugopal. 2012. “Indian Collectivism Revisited: Unpacking the Western Gaze.” In Shanta Nair-Venugopal (ed.), The Gaze of the West and Framings of the East, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 156–169.
-
Payne, Richard. 2012. “Buddhism and the Powers of the Mind.” In David L. McMahan (ed.), Buddhism in the Modern World, London: Routledge, 233–256.
-
Payne, Richard. 2016. “White-Washing the Buddhisms: Unacknowledged Privilege and the Making of a White-Safe Buddhism.” Critical Reflections on Buddhist Thought, 12 December. URL: https://criticalreflectionsonbuddhistthought.org/2016/12/12/white-washing-the-buddhisms-unacknowledged-privilege-and-the-making-of-a-white-safe-buddhism/.
-
Pierce, Lori Anne. 2000. “Constructing American Buddhisms: Discourses of Race and Religion in Territorial Hawaii.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
-
Prebish, Charles. 1999. “The Academic Study of Buddhism in America: A Silent Sangha.” In Duncan Ryūken Williams and Christopher S. Queen (eds.), American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship, Richmond: Curzon: 183–214.
-
Prebish, Charles. 2006. “The New Panditas.” Lion’s Roar, March. URL: https://www.lionsroar.com/the-new-panditas/.
-
Quli, Natalie E. 2009. “Western Self, Asian Other: Modernity, Authenticity, and Nostalgia for ‘Tradition’ in Buddhist Studies.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 16: 1–38.
-
Reader, Ian. 2008. “Buddhism and the Perils of Advocacy.” Journal of Global Buddhism 9: 83–112.
-
Robertson, Roland. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.
-
Rogers, Richard A. 2006. “From Cultural Exchange to Transculturation: A Review and Reconceptualization of Cultural Appropriation.” Communication Theory 16: 474–503.
-
Schedneck, Brooke. 2017. “Religious Encounters in Thailand: International Meditation Centers Within Transnational Settings.” Jørn Borup and Marianne Q. Fibiger (eds.), Eastspirit: Transnational Spirituality and Religious Circulation in East and West. Leiden: Brill: 279–298.
-
Shields, James Mark, and Leah Kalmanson. 2014. “Introduction.” In Leah Kalmanson and James Mark Shields (eds.), Buddhist Responses to Globalization, Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books: 6–13.
-
Smith, Sharon E., Sally R. Munt, and Andrew Kam-Tuck Yip. 2016. Cosmopolitan Dharma: Race, Sexuality, and Gender in British Buddhism. Leiden: Brill.
-
Spencer, Anne. 2014. “Diversification in the Buddhist Churches of America: Demographic Trends and Their Implications for the Future Study of U.S. Buddhist Groups.” Journal of Global Buddhism 15: 35–61.
-
Suh, Sharon A. 2019. “‘We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Programming to Bring You This Very Important Public Service Announcement …’. Aka Buddhism as Usual in the Academy.” In George Yancy and Emily McRae (eds.), Buddhism and Whiteness: Critical Reflections, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 5–19.
-
Tran, Kim. 2016. “4 Signs You’re Culturally Appropriating Buddhism — And Why It’s Important Not To.” Everydayfeminism.com, 21 July. URL: https://everydayfeminism.com/2016/07/culturally-appropriating-buddhism/.
-
Tworkov, Helen. 1991. “Many Is More.” Tricycle, Winter. URL: http://tricycle.org/magazine/many-more/.
-
Urban, Hugh B. 2007. Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics, and Power in the Study of Religion. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
-
Valk, Julie. 2015. “The ‘Kimono Wednesday’ Protests: Identity Politics and How the Kimono Became More Than Japanese.” Asian Ethnology 74(2): 379–399.
-
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2017. Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Vesely-Flad, Rima. 2017. “Black Buddhists and the Body: New Approaches to Socially Engaged Buddhism.” Religions 8: 1–9.
-
Warner, Brad. 2016. “Is White Buddhism Cultural Appropriation?” Hardcore Zen, August. URL: http://hardcorezen.info/is-white-buddhism-cultural-appropriation/4752.
-
Warner, Cameron. 2017. “On the Road from Hinduism to Buddhism: Global Buddhism, the Conversion of Nepali Hindus, and What Comes Between.” In Jørn Borup and Marianne Fibiger (eds.), Eastspirit: Transnational Spirituality and Religious Circulation in East and West, Leiden: Brill, 234–254.
-
Williams, Angel Kyodo, Rod Owens, and Jasmine Syedullah. 2016. Radical Dharma: Talking Race, Love and Liberation. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
-
Wilson, Jeff. 2009. Mourning the Unborn Dead: A Buddhist Ritual Comes to America. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Wilson, Jeff. 2014. Mindful America: The Mutual Transformation of Buddhist Meditation and American Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Woods, Orlando. 2018. “(Re)producing Buddhist Hegemony in Sri Lanka: Advancing the Discursive Formations of Self-Orientalism, Religious (Im)mobility and ‘Unethical’ Conversion.” Religion 48: 215–235.
-
Yancy, George, and Emily McRae. 2019. “Introduction.” In George Yancy and Emily McRae (eds.), Buddhism and Whiteness: Critical Reflections, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books: xv–xxi.
-
Young, James O. 2005. “Profound Offense and Cultural Appropriation.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63(2): 135–146.
-
Young, James O., and Susan Haley. 2009. “Nothing Comes from Nowhere: Reflections on Cultural Appropriation as the Representation of Other Cultures.” James O. Young and Conrad G. Brunk (eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 268–289.
-
Zahn, Max. 2016. “Mindfulness Has Gone Corporate: Why Has America Appropriated Buddhism for Capitalist Ends?” AlterNet, 13 July. URL: https://www.alternet.org/mindfullness-buddhism-capitalist-ends.
-
Ziff, Bruce, and P. R. Rao. 1997. Borrowed Power: Essays on Cultural Appropriation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
-
http://www.angryasianbuddhist.com
-
https://www.buddhistdoor.net/news/china-clamps-down-on-for-profit-buddhism
-
https://www.buddhistteachers.org/media/archive1/Western-Buddhist-Teachers-History.pdf
-
https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/news/story/yoga-certification-board-set-up-by-govt-to-certify-yoga-professionals-1375894-2018-10-26
-
https://www.hafsite.org/takeyogaback
-
www.knowingbuddha.org
-
https://northamericanbuddhistalliance.org/calls-to-buddhists/
-
http://www.proudblackbuddhist.org/
-
http://szba.org/szba-ethics-statement/
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 4510 | 640 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 772 | 81 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1384 | 154 | 9 |
Who Owns Religion? Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Cultural Appropriation in Postglobal Buddhism
In: NumenSearch for other papers by Jørn Borup in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
While historically sharing the characteristics of a universalistic religion and a modernist grand narrative, global Buddhism is mainly the product of a late modern development. Centripetal forces with circulating ideas, practices, and institutions have been part of a liberal market in an open exchange society with “open hermeneutics” and an accessible universal grammar. Its global focus has triggered de-ethnification, de-culturalization, and de-territorialization, claiming transnational universality as a central paradigm fit for a global world beyond isolationalist particularism. However, such seemingly universalist versions of a global Buddhism in recent years, mainly in North America, have been criticized for actually being representations of particular cultures (e.g., “white Buddhism”) with benefits for only particular segments. This article investigates the discourses of this new turn, involving questions of authority, authenticity, identity, cultural appropriation, and representation. It is suggested that criticism of global Buddhism should be seen as typical of what could be called “postglobal Buddhism,” in which identity politics is a frame of reference serving as a centrifugal force, signaling a new phase in “Western Buddhism.” The relevance for the study of religion is further discussed with reflections on how to respond to post-global religious identity politics without being consumed by either stark objectivism or subjectivist go-nativism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 4510 | 640 | 35 |
| Full Text Views | 772 | 81 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 1384 | 154 | 9 |
