Circles of Confidence in Correspondence

Modeling Confidentiality and Secrecy in Knowledge Exchange Networks of Letters and Drawings in the Early Modern Period

in Nuncius
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Science in the early modern world depended on openness in scholarly communication. On the other hand, a web of commercial, political, and religious conflicts required broad measures of secrecy and confidentiality; similar measures were integral to scholarly rivalries and plagiarism. This paper analyzes confidentiality and secrecy in intellectual and technological knowledge exchange via letters and drawings. We argue that existing approaches to understanding knowledge exchange in early modern Europe – which focus on the Republic of Letters as a unified entity of corresponding scholars – can be improved upon by analyzing multilayered networks of communication. We describe a data model to analyze circles of confidence and cultures of secrecy in intellectual and technological knowledge exchanges. Finally, we discuss the outcomes of a first experiment focusing on the question of how personal and professional/official relationships interact with confidentiality and secrecy, based on a case study of the correspondence of Hugo Grotius.

Circles of Confidence in Correspondence

Modeling Confidentiality and Secrecy in Knowledge Exchange Networks of Letters and Drawings in the Early Modern Period

in Nuncius

Sections

References

1

Franz Mauelshagen“Networks of Trust and Imagined Community of the Learned,” The Medieval History Journal2003 6:1–32 p. 1.

2

Dirk van Miert“Introduction,” in Communicating Observations in Early Modern Letters (1500–1675): Epistolography and Epistemology in the Age of the Scientific Revolutionedited by Dirk van Miert (London/Turin: The Warburg Institute/Nino Aragno Editore 2013) p. 7.

3

Maarten Ultee“The Republic of Letters: Learned Correspondence, 1680–1720,” The Seventeenth Century1987 2/1:95–112 for the various uses of the term Republic of Letters in the correspondence of Erasmus Voltaire and Leibniz.

6

Margócsy“The Republican Army of Letters” 2014. Title of an unpublished lecture presented at the History of Science Society annual meeting on November 8 2014. We are indebted to Dániel Margócsy (Hunter College – City University of New York) for granting us access to his article in the process of revision for publication: “A Long History of Breakdowns: A Historiographic Review” Social Studies of Science [forthcoming] written as an introduction to the conference Breaking Scientific Networks organized by him at the Center for Science & Innovation Studies University of California Davis April 25 2014: www.breakingscientificnetworks.info (accessed 9 February 2015).

11

David Stephan Lux Harold John Cook“Closed Circles or Open Networks?: Communicating at a Distance during the Scientific Revolution,” History of Science1998 36:179–211.

19

Edzo Hendrik Waterbolk“Viglius als kaartenverzamelaar,” in Verspreide Opstellen (Amsterdam: Bert Bakker 1981) p. 144.

22

Charles van den Heuvel“ ‘Capitaine Jehan Marie et Maistre Bastien d’ Utrecht’ – Enige onbekende tekeningen van Giovanni Maria Olgiati en Sebastiaan van Noyen van Spaanse grensversterkingen in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden rond het midden van de zestiende eeuw,” Jaarboek Stichting Menno van Coehoorn 1986 87:9–23; Pieter Martens Militaire architectuur en vestingoorlog in de Nederlanden tijdens het regentschap van Maria van Hongarije (1531–1555). De ontwikkeling van de vestingbouw PhD (Ghent: Ghent University 2009) pp. 175–207.

33

Henk NellenHugo Grotius. A Lifelong Struggle for Peace in Church and State 1583–1645 (Leiden, Boston: Brill2015) p. 232.

41

Mario Biagioli“Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability in Seventeenth-Century Science,” Critical Inquiry1996 22/2:193–238.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Figure 1

    Bartolomeo Campi, design for the citadel of Antwerp with contract, 1572 (detail)Antwerp (Belgium) Stadsarchief [City Archives] 12 # 10774

  • View in gallery
    Figure 2

    Attributes of nodes and edges expressing the roles of individuals and the nature of the relationships between them in the exchange of intellectual and technological knowledge

  • View in gallery
    Figure 3

    Expected properties of the structures of intellectual and technological networks

  • View in gallery
    Figure 4

    Ego network of Hugo Grotius with his 69 most frequent correspondents. Red nodes are professional respondents, yellow nodes are personal respondents. Orange nodes belong to both networks. The distance of a node from the centre (Grotius) and the thickness of the edge (edge weight) both represent the degree of reciprocity.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 40 40 6
Full Text Views 82 82 60
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0