This article argues that Ḥanafī uṣūlīs of the later phases of the postclassical period understood uṣūl to be universal propositions that were underdetermined with respect to their evidentiary bases. Though the purpose of such propositions was to confer actionable certainty to particular legal effects, the later tradition imagined the main charge of uṣūl al-fiqh on a meta-theoretic level, i.e., to determine how such propositions could themselves be suitably grounded. In casting the discourse within the framework of naturalized technical methods and distinctions from fields of logic and philosophy, the tradition generally granted the relational and systemic validity of each proposition in terms of the grounding it received from another underdetermined proposition. This second-order perspective of the tradition reveals that uṣūl were systemically and relationally valid, but individually underdetermined. Thus the application of the attribute of relational validity to them and to the effects for which they are serviceable is apt.
Ahmed Asad Q. “Postclassical Philosophical Commentaries: Innovation in the Margins” Oriens 41.3–4 (2013): 317–48.
Ahmed Asad Q. “The Sullam al-ʿulūm of Muḥibb Allāh al-Bihārī.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy ed. by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. New York: Oxford University Press 2016 488–508.
Ahmed Asad Q. “Baḥr al-ʿUlūm ʿAbd al-ʿAlī.” In Encyclopedia of Islam III ed. by Kate Fleet Gudrun Krämer Denis Matringe John Nawas and Everett Rowson. Consulted online on 11 October 2017 http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.berkeley.edu/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_25153.
Avicenna. Avicenna’s Deliverance: Logic. Translated by Asad Q. Ahmed with an Introduction by Tony Street. Karachi: Oxford University Press 2011.
Al-Azem Talal. Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition: Ibn Quṭlūbughā’s Commentary on the Compendium of Qudūrī. Leiden: Brill 2017.
Badāyūnī Usayd al-Ḥaqq al-Qādirī. Khayrābādiyyāt. Budaun: Tajul Fuhool Academy 2011.
Bouhafa Feriel. “Averroes’ Corrective Philosophy of Law.” In Interpreting Averroes ed. by Peter Adamson and Matteo di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
Fine Kit. “Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality ed. by Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012 37–80.
Hallaq Wael. “On Inductive Corroboration Probability and Certainty in Sunnī Legal Thought.” In Islamic Law and Jurisprudence: Studies in Honor of Farhat J. Ziadeh ed. by Nicolas Heer. Seattle: University of Washington Press 1990 3–31.
Hallaq Wael. “Logic Formal Arguments and Formalization of Arguments in Sunni Legal Theory.” Arabica 37.3 (1990): 315–58.
Hidāyatallāh. Baḥr al-hidāyat: urdu sharḥ musallam al-thubūt. (no further publication information available).
Kalbarczyk Nora. Sprachphilosophie in der islamischen Rechtstheorie. Die avicennische Klassifikation der Bezeichnung bei Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī. Leiden: Brill forthcoming 2018.
Khān Ṣiddīq Ḥasan. Abjad al-ʿulūm ed. by ʿAbd al-Jabbār Zakkār. Damascus: Wizārat al-Thaqāfa 1978.