Underdetermination in Late Postclassical Ḥanafī Legal Theories

in Oriens
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article argues that Ḥanafī uṣūlīs of the later phases of the postclassical period understood uṣūl to be universal propositions that were underdetermined with respect to their evidentiary bases. Though the purpose of such propositions was to confer actionable certainty to particular legal effects, the later tradition imagined the main charge of uṣūl al-fiqh on a meta-theoretic level, i.e., to determine how such propositions could themselves be suitably grounded. In casting the discourse within the framework of naturalized technical methods and distinctions from fields of logic and philosophy, the tradition generally granted the relational and systemic validity of each proposition in terms of the grounding it received from another underdetermined proposition. This second-order perspective of the tradition reveals that uṣūl were systemically and relationally valid, but individually underdetermined. Thus the application of the attribute of relational validity to them and to the effects for which they are serviceable is apt.

Underdetermination in Late Postclassical Ḥanafī Legal Theories

in Oriens

Sections

References

Ahmed Asad Q. “Postclassical Philosophical Commentaries: Innovation in the Margins” Oriens 41.3–4 (2013): 317–48.

Ahmed Asad Q. “The Sullam al-ʿulūm of Muḥibb Allāh al-Bihārī.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy ed. by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. New York: Oxford University Press 2016 488–508.

Ahmed Asad Q. “Baḥr al-ʿUlūm ʿAbd al-ʿAlī.” In Encyclopedia of Islam III ed. by Kate Fleet Gudrun Krämer Denis Matringe John Nawas and Everett Rowson. Consulted online on 11 October 2017 http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.berkeley.edu/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_25153.

Avicenna. Avicenna’s Deliverance: Logic. Translated by Asad Q. Ahmed with an Introduction by Tony Street. Karachi: Oxford University Press 2011.

Al-Azem Talal. Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition: Ibn Quṭlūbughā’s Commentary on the Compendium of Qudūrī. Leiden: Brill 2017.

Badāyūnī Usayd al-Ḥaqq al-Qādirī. Khayrābādiyyāt. Budaun: Tajul Fuhool Academy 2011.

Baḥr al-ʿulūm ʿAbd al-ʿAlī Muḥammad b. Niẓām al-Dīn. Fawātiḥ al-raḥamūt bi-sharḥ Musallam al-thubūt li-l-Imām al-Qāḍī Muḥibballāh b. ʿAbd al-Shukūr al-Bihārī ed. by ʿAbdallāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad ʿUmar. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya 2002.

Al-Bihārī Muḥibballāh b. ʿAbd al-Shukūr Musallam al-thubūt. Egypt: Būlāq 1322 AH.

Bouhafa Feriel. “Averroes’ Corrective Philosophy of Law.” In Interpreting Averroes ed. by Peter Adamson and Matteo di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

Fine Kit. “Guide to Ground.” In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality ed. by Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012 37–80.

Hallaq Wael. “On Inductive Corroboration Probability and Certainty in Sunnī Legal Thought.” In Islamic Law and Jurisprudence: Studies in Honor of Farhat J. Ziadeh ed. by Nicolas Heer. Seattle: University of Washington Press 1990 3–31.

Hallaq Wael. “Logic Formal Arguments and Formalization of Arguments in Sunni Legal Theory.” Arabica 37.3 (1990): 315–58.

Hidāyatallāh. Baḥr al-hidāyat: urdu sharḥ musallam al-thubūt. (no further publication information available).

Kalbarczyk Nora. Sprachphilosophie in der islamischen Rechtstheorie. Die avicennische Klassifikation der Bezeichnung bei Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī. Leiden: Brill forthcoming 2018.

Khān Ṣiddīq Ḥasan. Abjad al-ʿulūm ed. by ʿAbd al-Jabbār Zakkār. Damascus: Wizārat al-Thaqāfa 1978.

Al-Khayrābādī ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq. Sharḥ Musallam al-thubūt maʿa sharḥ jumlat al-minhiyyāt/muhiyyāt. Quetta: Maktaba Islāmiyya Mīzān Markit nd.

Al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm uṣūl uṣūl al-fiqh ed. by Ṭ. Fayyāḍ al-ʿAlwānī. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla 1992.

Al-Sakkākī Abū Yaʿqūb. Kitāb Miftāḥ al-ʿulūm wa-maʿahu Kitāb Itmām al-dirāya li-qurrāʾ al-Niqāya. Egypt: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Maymaniyya nd.

Young Walter Edward. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2016.

Al-Zarkashī Badr al-Dīn. al-Baḥr al-muḥīṭ fī uṣūl al-fiqh ed. by ʿAbd al-Qādir al-ʿĀnī. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf 1992.

Zysow Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Ph.D. Dissertation Harvard University 1984.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 64 64 34
Full Text Views 102 102 79
PDF Downloads 12 12 6
EPUB Downloads 7 7 0