Debating the Imperative Mood in Uṣūl al-Fiqh

Collective Deliberation and Legal Validity

in Oriens
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article offers an analysis of the way a number of classical Muslim scholars treated the question of the normative impact of statements in the imperative mood. This question, which was standard in classical works of legal theory, is noteworthy for its direct implication in establishing links between linguistic forms and normative positions. It reveals to us with some clarity the logic of norm-formation in part of the tradition. It will be argued that the debates surrounding the normative impact of the imperative mood reflect a logic of collective deliberation that highlights a reliance on the authority of the community of jurists as a foundation of validity for jurisprudential principles. Establishing the validity of legal norms and processes that lead to their formulation is a common concern among legal systems. In the study of classical Islamic law, it is commonly assumed that the jurists derived substantive norms from revealed sources using the tools and methods of Islamic legal theory. This assumption locates the validity of legal norms and their formulation exclusively in divine will as expressed in revelation. This study suggests that we can view debates in legal theory as efforts in grounding legal validity in various sources of authority, including revealed language and the collective authority of the scholars. This corresponds to what has been described in analytic jurisprudence as a secondary rule of recognition.

Debating the Imperative Mood in Uṣūl al-Fiqh

Collective Deliberation and Legal Validity

in Oriens

Sections

References

ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-Asadābādī Abī al-Ḥasan. Al-Mughnī Fī Abwāb al-Tawḥīd wal-ʿadl. Vol. 17. 20 vols. Cairo: Wizārat al-Thaqāfah wa-al-Irshād al-Qawmī. n.d.

Abū al-Baqāʾ Ayyūb b. Musā. al-Kulliyyāt: muʿjam fil-muṣṭalaḥạ̄t wa-l-furūq al-lughawīyya. Adnan Darwish and Muhammad Al-Masri eds. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla 1992.

Ahmad Ahmad Atif. Structural Interrelations of Theory and Practice in Islamic Law: A Study of Six Works of Medieval Islamic Jurisprudence. Leiden; Boston: Brill 2006.

Ali Zain. “Concepts of God in Islam.” PHC3 Philosophy Compass 11 no. 12 (2016): 892–904.

Austin John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined: And the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1968.

al-Bāqillānī Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn al-Ṭayyib. Al-Taqrīb Wal-Irshād “Al-Ṣaghīr.” Edited by ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd b. ʿAlī Abū Zunayd. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah 1998.

Berg Herbert “The Divine Sources.” In Peters Rudolph and P.J. Bearman. The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law. London; New York: Routledge 2016

Charnock Ross. “Lexical Indeterminacy: Contextualism and Rule-Following in Common Law Adjudication” in Anne Wagner et al. Interpretation Law and the Construction of Meaning: Collected Papers on Legal Interpretation in Theory Adjudication and Political Practice. Dordrecht the Netherlands: Springer 2007.

Dworkin Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge Mass.: Belknap Press 1986.

Emon Anver M. Islamic Natural Law Theories. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Farahat Omar. “Commands as Divine Attributes: Islamic Jurisprudence and the Euthyphro Question.” Journal of Religious Ethics 44 no. 4 (2016): 581–605.

Gleave Robert “Deriving Rules of Law.” In Peters Rudolph and P.J. Bearman. The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law. London; New York: Routledge 2016.

Gleave Robert. Inevitable Doubt: Two Theories of Shīʿī Jurisprudence. Leiden: Brill 2000.

Hallaq Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl Al-Fiqh. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press 1997.

Hart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1961.

Ibn Manẓūr Muḥammad Ibn Mukarram. Lisān al-ʾArab. Cairo: Dār al-Maʾārif 1982.

Jackson Sherman A. “Fiction and Formalism: Toward a Functional Analysis of Usul Al-Fiqh.” In Weiss Bernard G. ed. Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill 2002.

Jaṣṣāṣ Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. Uṣūl al-fiqh al-musammā bil-Fuṣūl fī l-uṣūl. ʿUjayl Jāsim Nashamī ed. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. 4 vols. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf wal-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya 1994.

Kramer Matthew. “Of Final Things: Morality as One of the Ultimate Determinants of Legal Validity.” Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy 24 no. 1 (2005): 47–97.

Maḥmūd b. Zayd al-Lāmishī Kitāb fī uṣūl al-fiqh ed. Abdulhamid Turki. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī 1995.

Lamond Grant. “Legal Systems and the Rule of Recognition: Discussion of Marmor’s Philosophy of Law Book Symposium on Andrei Marmor’s Philosophy of Law.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 10 (2014): 68–80.

Marmor Andrei. Philosophy of Law. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press 2011.

Miller Larry B. “Islamic Disputation Theory: A Study of the Development of Dialectic in Islam from the Tenth Through Fourteenth Centuries.” Ph.D. Princeton University 1984.

Murphy L. “Better to See Law This Way.” New York University Law Review. 83 no. 4 (2008): 1088–1108.

Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad b. ʿUmar al-. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm al-uṣūl. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā. 1st ed. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya 1999.

Kevin Reinhart “ ‘Like the Difference Between Heaven and Earth’: Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī Distinction of Farḍ and Wājib in Theology and Uṣūl.” In Bernard G. Weiss ed. Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill 2002. 205–234.

Ricœur Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. TCU Press 1976.

Samʿānī Manṣūr Ibn-Muḥammad. Qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī al-uṣūl. Mohammed Hasan Ismail Shafiʾi ed. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya 1997.

Schauer Frederick F. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Clarendon Press 1991.

Schauer Frederick F. The Force of Law. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 2015.

Schauer Frederick F. “Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law.” Ratio Juris 23 no. 1 (2010): 1–21.

Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftazānī Sharḥ al-talwīḥ ʿala al-tawdīḥ 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿllmiyya.

Weiss Bernard G. Search for God’s Law Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf Al-Din Al-Amidi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press 2010.

Wolterstorff Nicholas. Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim That God Speaks. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press 2000.

Young Walter Edward. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2016.

Zysow Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta Georgia: Lockwood Press 2013.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 35 18
Full Text Views 85 85 68
PDF Downloads 8 8 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0