This article offers an analysis of the way a number of classical Muslim scholars treated the question of the normative impact of statements in the imperative mood. This question, which was standard in classical works of legal theory, is noteworthy for its direct implication in establishing links between linguistic forms and normative positions. It reveals to us with some clarity the logic of norm-formation in part of the tradition. It will be argued that the debates surrounding the normative impact of the imperative mood reflect a logic of collective deliberation that highlights a reliance on the authority of the community of jurists as a foundation of validity for jurisprudential principles. Establishing the validity of legal norms and processes that lead to their formulation is a common concern among legal systems. In the study of classical Islamic law, it is commonly assumed that the jurists derived substantive norms from revealed sources using the tools and methods of Islamic legal theory. This assumption locates the validity of legal norms and their formulation exclusively in divine will as expressed in revelation. This study suggests that we can view debates in legal theory as efforts in grounding legal validity in various sources of authority, including revealed language and the collective authority of the scholars. This corresponds to what has been described in analytic jurisprudence as a secondary rule of recognition.
Abū al-Baqāʾ, Ayyūb b. Musā. al-Kulliyyāt: muʿjam fil-muṣṭalaḥạ̄t wa-l-furūq al-lughawīyya. Adnan Darwish and Muhammad Al-Masri, eds. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1992.
Ahmad, Ahmad Atif. Structural Interrelations of Theory and Practice in Islamic Law: A Study of Six Works of Medieval Islamic Jurisprudence. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2006.
Ali, Zain. “Concepts of God in Islam.” PHC3 Philosophy Compass 11, no. 12 (2016): 892–904.
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined: And the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968.
al-Bāqillānī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn al-Ṭayyib. Al-Taqrīb Wal-Irshād “Al-Ṣaghīr.” Edited by ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd b. ʿAlī Abū Zunayd. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. 3 vols. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1998.
Berg, Herbert, “The Divine Sources.” In Peters, Rudolph, and P.J. Bearman. The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law. London; New York: Routledge, 2016
Charnock, Ross. “Lexical Indeterminacy: Contextualism and Rule-Following in Common Law Adjudication,” in Anne Wagner et al., Interpretation, Law, and the Construction of Meaning: Collected Papers on Legal Interpretation in Theory, Adjudication and Political Practice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2007.
Kramer, Matthew. “Of Final Things: Morality as One of the Ultimate Determinants of Legal Validity.” Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy 24, no. 1 (2005): 47–97.
Lamond, Grant. “Legal Systems and the Rule of Recognition: Discussion of Marmor’s Philosophy of Law Book Symposium on Andrei Marmor’s Philosophy of Law.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 10 (2014): 68–80.
Marmor, Andrei. Philosophy of Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2011.
Miller, Larry B. “Islamic Disputation Theory: A Study of the Development of Dialectic in Islam from the Tenth Through Fourteenth Centuries.” Ph.D., Princeton University, 1984.
Murphy, L. “Better to See Law This Way.” New York University Law Review. 83, no. 4 (2008): 1088–1108.
Kevin Reinhart “ ‘Like the Difference Between Heaven and Earth’: Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī Distinction of Farḍ and Wājib in Theology and Uṣūl.” In Bernard G. Weiss ed., Studies in Islamic Legal Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2002. 205–234.
Ricœur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. TCU Press, 1976.