Explicitly Said or Only Implied?

The Development of the manṭūq / mafhūm Dichotomy in Islamic Legal Hermeneutics

in Oriens
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

There are two main approaches in Islamic legal theory to the classification of a meaning as explicit or implicit. The two approaches—i.e. the Šāfiʿite and the Ḥanafite—differ with regard to their underlying hermeneutic paradigms. It is sometimes assumed that the “standard” Šāfiʿite approach corresponds to that of Āmidī (d. 631/1233). However, as this paper argues, there were two other authors who had a major impact on the evolution of the Šāfiʿite approach: the post-Avicennian polymath and Šāfiʿī jurist Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī (d. 606/1210); and the Mālikite jurist Ibn al-Ḥāǧib (d. 646/1249) who creates his own classification—on the basis of both Āmidī’s approach and the Ḥanafite paradigm. Aḍud ad-dīn al-Īǧī (d. 756/1355) eventually modified Ibn al-Ḥāǧib’s classification using Rāzī’s framework—and this is the version which is nowadays referred to as the Šāfiʿite approach.

Explicitly Said or Only Implied?

The Development of the manṭūq / mafhūm Dichotomy in Islamic Legal Hermeneutics

in Oriens

Sections

References

al-Āmidī Sayf ad-dīn. al-Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām. Ed. ʿAbd ar-Razzāq ʿAfīfī. Riyāḍ: Dār aṣ-Ṣumayʿī 2003.

al-Āmidī Sayf ad-dīn. Muntahā as-sūʾl fī ʿilm al-uṣūl. Ed. Aḥmad Farīd al-Mazīdī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2003.

al-Bābartī Akmal ad-dīn Muḥammad b. Maḥmūd. ar-Rudūd wa-n-nuqūd: Šarḥ Muḫtaṣar Ibn al-Ḥāǧib vol. 1. ed. by Ṣāliḥ b. ʿAwn al-ʿUmarī; vol. 2 ed. by Tarḥīb b. Rabīʿān ad-Dawsrī. Riyāḍ: Maktabat al-Rušd Nāširūn 2005.

al-Bāqillānī Qāḍī Abū Bakr. at-Taqrīb wa-l-iršād. Ed. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd b. ʿAlī Abū Zunayd. Beirut: Muʾassasat ar-Risāla 1998.

al-Baṣrī Abū l-Ḥusayn. Kitāb al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Ed. Muḥammad Ḥamīd Allāh. Damascus: al-Maʿhad al-ʿilmī l-faransī li-d-dirāsāt al-ʿarabiyya 1964–1965.

Bauer Thomas. Die Kultur der Ambiguität. Eine andere Geschichte des Islams. Berlin: Verlag der Weltreligionen 2011.

al-Bayḍāwī ʿAbdallāh b. ʿUmar. Minhāǧ al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl. Ed. Salīm Šabʿāniyya. Damascus: Dār Dāniya 1989.

al-Bazdawī ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. Kanz al-wuṣūl ilā maʿrifat al-uṣūl (with al-Buḫārī’s commentary Kašf al-asrār). Ed. Aḥmad Ḫulūṣī and Muṣṭafā Darwīš. Istanbul 1890–1.

Bernand Marie. “Controverses Médiévales sur le Dalīl al-Ḫiṭāb”. Arabica vol. 33 no. 3 (Nov. 1986): pp. 269–94.

Endress Gerhard. “Reading Avicenna in the Madrasa: Intellectual Genealogies and Chains of Transmission of Philosophy and the Sciences in the Islamic East”. In Arabic Theology Arabic Philosophy. From the Many to the One: Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank ed. by James E. Montgomery pp. 371–422. Leuven: Peeters 2006.

van Ess Josef. Die Träume der Schulweisheit. Leben und Werk des ʿAlī b. Muḥammad al-Ǧurǧānī (gest. 816/1413). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2013.

Ǧamāl ad-dīn Muṣṭafā. al-Baḥṯ an-naḥwī ʿinda l-uṣūliyyīn. Baghdad: Dār ar-Rašīd li-n-našr 1980.

al-Ġazālī Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad. al-Mustaṣfā min ʿilm al-uṣūl. Ed. Ḥamza b. Zuhayr Ḥāfiẓ. Medina: Šarikat al-Madīna al-munawwara li-ṭ-ṭibāʿa wa-n-našr 1993.

al-Ġazālī Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad. Šifāʾ al-ġalīl fī bayān aš-šubah wa-l-muḫīl wa masālik at-taʿlīl. Ed. Ḥamd al-Kabīsī. Baghdad: al-Maṭbaʿa l-iršād 1971.

Gleave Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: University Press 2013.

al-Ǧurǧānī ʿAlī b. Muḥammad aš-Šarīf. Kitāb at-Taʿrīfāt. Ed. unknown Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Ḫayriyya 1888.

Gutas Dimitri. “The Heritage of Avicenna: The Golden Age of Arabic Philosophy 1000–ca 1350”. In Avicenna and his Heritage ed. by Jules Janssens and Daniel De Smet pp. 81–97. Leuven: University Press 2002.

Gutas Dimitri. “Avicenna’s philosophical project”. In Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays ed. by Peter Adamson pp. 28–47. Cambridge: University Press 2013.

al-Ǧuwaynī Imām al-Ḥaramayn. al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Ed. Ṣāliḥ b. Muḥammad b. ʿUwayḍa. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 1997.

al-Ǧuwaynī Imām al-Ḥaramayn. at-Talḫīṣ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Ed. Muḥammad Ḥasan Ismaʿīl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2003.

Gwynne Rosalind. “The A Fortiori Argument in FiqhNaḥw and Kalām”. In Studies in the History of Arabic Grammar II. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on the History of Arabic Grammar Nijmwegen 27. April–1. May 1987 ed. by Kees Versteegh and Michael G. Carter pp. 165–77. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company 1990.

Hallaq Wael B. “Non-Analogical Arguments in Sunni Juridical Qiyās”. Arabica vol. 36 (1989): pp. 286–306.

Hallaq Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī uṣūl al-fiqh. Cambridge: University Press 1997.

Hasan Ahmad. “Finding the Cause of a Legal Injunction in Islamic Jurisprudence”. Islamic Studies vol. 25 no. 1 (1986): pp. 11–44.

Holtzmann Livnat. “The Dhimmi’s Question on Predetermination and the Ulama’s Six Responses: The Dynamics of Composing Polemical Didactic Poems in Mamluk Cairo and Damascus”. Mamluk Studies Review vol. 16 (2012): pp. 1–54.

Ibn al-Ḥāǧib Ǧamāl ad-dīn. Kitāb Muntahā al-wuṣūl wa-l-amal fī ʿilmay al-uṣūl wa-l-ǧadal. Ed. unknown. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 1985.

Ibn al-Ḥāǧib Ǧamāl ad-dīn. Muḫtaṣar al-muntahā fī s-sūʾl wa-l-amal fī ʿilmay al-uṣūl wa-l-ǧadal. Ed. Naẓīr Ḥamādū. Algiers: Dār Ibn Ḥazm 2006.

Ibn Ḫaldūn ʿAbd ar-Raḥmān b. Muḥammad. al-Muqqadima. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān 1970. [Reprint of the edition by Benjamin Duprat Paris 1858].

Ibn Ḫallikān Aḥmad b. Muḥammad. Wafayāt al-aʿyān wa-anbāʾ abnāʾ az-zamān. Ed. Iḥsān ʿAbbās. Beirut: Dār aṯ-ṯaqāfa 1968–72.

Ibn Sāʿātī Aḥmad b. ʿAlī. Kitāb al-Badīʿ. Ed. Muṣṭafā Maḥmūd al-Azharī and Muḥammad Ḥusayn ad-Dimyāṭī. Riyāḍ/Cairo: Dār Ibn al-Qayyim/ Dār Ibn ʿAffān 2014.

Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb aš-Šifāʾ al-Manṭiq al-Madḫal. Ed. Ibrāhīm Madkūr and Ǧurǧ Qanawātī et al. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿĀmma li-Šuʾūn al-maṭābiʿ al-Amīriyya 1952.

al-Īǧī ʿAḍud ad-dīn. Šarḥ Muḫtaṣar al-Muntahā (with glosses by Taftazānī and Ǧurǧānī). Ed. Fādī Naṣīf and Ṭāriq Yaḥyā. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2000.

al-Iṣfahānī Šams ad-dīn. Bayān al-Muḫtaṣar: Šarḥ Muḫtaṣar Ibn al-Ḥāǧib. Ed. Muḥammad Maẓhur Baqā. Makka: Ǧāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā 1986.

al-Iṣfahānī Šams ad-dīn. Šarḥ al-Minhāǧ li-l-Bayḍāwī fī ʿilm al-uṣūl. Ed. ʿAbd al-Karīm b. ʿAlī b. Muḥammad an-Namla. Riyāḍ: Maktabat ar-rušd 1999 [1420].

Jackson Sherman A. Islamic Law and the State: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Shihāb Al-Dīn al-Qarāfī. Leiden: Brill 1996.

Kalbarczyk Nora. Sprachphilosophie in der islamischen Rechtstheorie. Die avicennische Klassifikation der Bezeichnung bei Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī forthcoming Leiden: Brill 2018.

Kalbarczyk Nora. “The Threefold Classification of Signification: Aspects of the Origins of muṭābaqataḍammun and iltizām in al-Fārābī’s and Ibn Sīnā’s Treatises on De Interpretatione and the Predicables” forthcoming.

Kamali Mohammad H. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society 32013.

al-Laknawī Niẓām ad-dīn al-Anṣārī. Fawātiḥ ar-raḥamūt bi-šarḥ Musallam aṯ-ṯubūt. Ed. ʿAbdallah Maḥmūd Muḥammad ʿUmar. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2002.

al-Qarāfī Šihāb ad-dīn. Nafāʾis al-uṣūl fī šarḥ al-Maḥṣūl. Ed. Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2000.

Ramić Šukrija H. Language and the Interpretation of Islamic Law. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society 2003.

ar-Rāzī Faḫr ad-dīn. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh. Ed. Ṭaha Ǧābir Fayāḍ al-ʿAlwānī. Riyāḍ: Ǧāmiʿat al-Imām Muḥammad b. Suʿūd al-Islāmiyya 1979.

ar-Rāzī Faḫr ad-dīn. at-Tafsīr al-kabīr aw Mafātīḥ al-ġayb vol. 1–33. Ed. Ibrāhīm Šams ad-dīn and Aḥmad Šams ad-din. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿilmiyya 2013.

ar-Rāzī Faḫr ad-dīn. Šarḥ al-Išārāt wa-t-tanbīhātal-Manṭiq. Ed. ʿAlī Reẓā Naǧafzādeh. Teheran: Anǧomān-e Āṯār va-Mofāḫer Farhangī 2005.

Stewart Devin J. Islamic Legal Orthodoxy: Twelver Shiite Responses to the Sunni Legal System. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press 1998.

Street Tony. “Faḫraddīn ar-Rāzī’s Critique of Avicennan Logic”. In Logik und Theologie. Das Organon im Arabischen und im Lateinischen Mittelalter ed. by Dominik Perler and Ulrich Rudolph pp. 99–116. Leiden: Brill 2005.

as-Subkī Tāǧ ad-dīn. Rafʿ al-ḥāǧib ʿan Muḫtaṣar Ibn al-Ḥāǧib. Ed. ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ and ʿĀdil Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawǧūd. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-kutub 1999.

as-Subkī Tāǧ ad-dīn and As-Subkī Taqī ad-dīn. Ibhāǧ fī Šarḥ al-Minhāǧ. Ed. Šaʿbān Muḥammad Ismāʿīl. Cairo: Maktabat al-Kullīyāt al-Azharīyah 1981 [1401].

as-Suyūṭī Ǧalāl ad-dīn. Kitāb Buġyat al-wuʿāt. Ed. Muḥammad Amīn Ḥānǧī and Aḥmad b. al-Amīn Šinqīṭī. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat as-Saʿāda 1908.

Vishanoff David R. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunni Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven Conn.: American Oriental Society 2011.

Weiss Bernard G. The Search for God’s Law. Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press 22010.

Yunis Ali Mohamed M. Medieval Islamic Pragmatics: Sunni Legal Theorists’ Models of Textual Communication. Richmond Surrey: Curzon Press 2000.

az-Zuhaylī Wahba. al-Uṣūl al-fiqh al-islamī. Damascus: Dār al-fikr 1986.

Zysow Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta: Lockwood Press 2013.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Figure 2

    Outline of Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī’s system of legal implications

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 38 20
Full Text Views 105 105 88
PDF Downloads 16 16 8
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0