With his original reflection—deeply influenced by many important Arabic thinkers—Gundissalinus wanted to renovate the Latin debate concerning crucial aspects of the philosophical tradition. Among the innovative doctrines he elaborated, one appears to be particularly problematic, for it touches a very delicate point of Christian theology: the divine creation of the human soul, and thus, the most intimate bond connecting the human being and his Creator. Notwithstanding the relevance of this point, Gundissalinus ascribed the creation of the human soul to the angels rather than God. He also stated that the angels create the souls from prime matter, and through a kind of causality which cannot be operated by God. What are the sources of this unusual and perilous doctrine? And what are the reasons which led Gundissalinus to hold such a problematic position? This article thoroughly examines the theoretical development and sources of Gundissalinus’s position, focusing on the correlations between this doctrine, the overall cosmological descriptions expounded by Gundissalinus in his original works, and the main sources upon which this unlikely doctrine is grounded: Avicenna and Ibn Gabirol.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Auctores varii. Summa Fratris Alexandri. Published under the title: Alexander of Hales, Summa theologica. Ed. by Collegii Sancti Bonaventurae. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii Sancti Bonaventurae, 1928.
Avicenna. Liber de anima seu sextus de naturalibus. Ed. by Simone Van Riet. Louvain—Leiden: Brill, 1972.
Avicenna. Liber de philosophia prima. Ed. by Simone Van Riet. Vol. 2. Louvain: Peeters, Leiden: Brill, 1980.
Beatrice, Pier Franco. The Transmission of Sin: Augustine and the Pre-Augustinian Sources. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Bertola, Ermenegildo. Salomon Ibn Gabirol (Avicebron): Vita, opere e pensiero. Padova: Milani, 1953.
Blosser, Benjamin P. Become Like the Angels: Origen’s Doctrine of the Soul. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2012.
Brunner, Fernand. “Création et émanation: Fragment de philosophie comparée.” Studia Philosophica 33 (1973): 33–63.
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “The Human Soul’s Individuation and Its Survival After the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation Between Body and Soul.” Arabic Science and Philosophy 10 (2000): 259–73.
Gundissalinus. De processione mundi. Published under the title De processione mundi: Estudio y edición crítica del tratado de D. Gundisalvo. Ed. by Maria Jesús Soto Bruna and Concepción Alonso Del Real. Pamplona: EUNSA, 1999.
Gundissalinus. The Procession of the World. Transl. by John A. Laumakis. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2002.
Gundissalinus. De anima. Published under the title El Tractatvs De Anima Atribuido A Dominicvs Gvundi[s]salinvs. Ed. by Maria Jesús Soto Bruna and Concepción Alonso Del Real. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2009.
Hasse, Dag Nikolaus and Andreas Büttner. “Notes on Anonymous Twelfth-Century Translations of Philosophical Texts from Arabic into Latin on the Iberian Peninsula.” In The Arabic, Hebrew, and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Physics and Cosmology. Ed. by Dag Nikolaus Hasse and Amos Bertolacci. Berlin—Boston: De Gruyter, 2018, 313–70.
Ibn Gabirol. Fons vitae. Published under the title Avencebrolis (Ibn Gebirol) Fons vitae ex Arabico in Latinum translatus ab Iohanne Hispano et Dominico Gundissalino. Ed. by Claemens Baeumker. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters. Vol. I.2–4. Münster: Aschendorff, 1892–95.
Ibn Gabirol. The Font of Life. Transl. by John A. Laumakis. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2014.
Pattin, Adriaan. “Le Liber de Causis.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28 (1966): 90–203.
Pattin, Adriaan. “Autour du Liber de Causis: Quelques réflexions sur la récente littérature.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 41 (1994): 354–88.
Pessin, Sarah. “Jewish Neoplatonism: Being above Being and Divine Emanation in Solomon Ibn Gabirol and Isaac Israeli.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Ed. by Daniel H. Frank and Oliver Leaman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 91–110.
Peter Lombard. Sententiae in IV libris distinctae. Liber IV. Ed. by Patres Collegii S. Bonaventurae. Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1916.
Polloni, Nicola. “Aristotle in Toledo: Gundissalinus, the Arabs, and Gerard of Cremona’s Translations.” In Ex Oriente Lux: Translating Words, Scripts and Styles in the Medieval Mediterranean World. Ed. by Charles Burnett and Pedro Mantas. Córdoba: UCOPress, London: The Warburg Institute, 2016, 147–85.
Polloni, Nicola. “Gundissalinus on Necessary Being: Textual and Doctrinal Alterations in the Exposition of Avicenna’s Metaphysics.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 26.1 (2016): 129–60.
Polloni, Nicola. “Gundissalinus’s Application of al-Farabi’s Metaphysical Programme. A Case of Epistemological Transfer.” Mediterranea: International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge 1 (2016): 69–106.
Polloni, Nicola. “Toledan Ontologies: Gundissalinus, Ibn Daud, and the Problems of Gabirolian Hylomorphism.” In Appropriation, Interpretation and Criticism: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges Between the Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Intellectual Traditions. Ed. by Alexander Fidora and Nicola Polloni. Barcelona—Roma: FIDEM, 2017, 19–49.
Polloni, Nicola. Domingo Gundisalvo. Una introducción. Madrid: Sindéresis, 2017.
Polloni, Nicola. Glimpses of the Invisible: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, forthcoming.
Pricianus. Institutiones grammaticae. Ed. by Heinrich Keil. Leipzig: Teubner, 1855.
Rombs, Ronnie J. Saint Augustine and the Fall of the Soul: Beyond O’Connell and His Critics. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2006.
Sebti, Meryem. Avicenne. L’ âme humaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2000.
Taylor, Richard C. “Remarks on the Latin Text and the Translator of the Kalam fi mahd al-khair/Liber de causis.” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 31 (1989): 75–102.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 48 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 34 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 8 | 0 |
With his original reflection—deeply influenced by many important Arabic thinkers—Gundissalinus wanted to renovate the Latin debate concerning crucial aspects of the philosophical tradition. Among the innovative doctrines he elaborated, one appears to be particularly problematic, for it touches a very delicate point of Christian theology: the divine creation of the human soul, and thus, the most intimate bond connecting the human being and his Creator. Notwithstanding the relevance of this point, Gundissalinus ascribed the creation of the human soul to the angels rather than God. He also stated that the angels create the souls from prime matter, and through a kind of causality which cannot be operated by God. What are the sources of this unusual and perilous doctrine? And what are the reasons which led Gundissalinus to hold such a problematic position? This article thoroughly examines the theoretical development and sources of Gundissalinus’s position, focusing on the correlations between this doctrine, the overall cosmological descriptions expounded by Gundissalinus in his original works, and the main sources upon which this unlikely doctrine is grounded: Avicenna and Ibn Gabirol.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 48 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 34 | 2 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 8 | 0 |