Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This study investigates Avicenna’s conception of philosophical terminology through an analysis of the relation between equivocity (ishtirāk) and modulation (tashkīk) and by drawing evidence from a broad array of logical, physical, and metaphysical texts. In so doing, it also re-examines the notion of the modulation of existence (tashkīk al-wujūd). Although the intrinsic definitional ambiguity of tashkīk makes it possible to approach it alternatively through the lens of univocity and equivocity, there are strong textual and philosophical reasons to believe that Avicenna preferred to regard tashkīk as a kind of moderate equivocity, as opposed to both univocity and a kind of pure or absolute equivocity. As a corollary, it is preferable to construe tashkīk al-wujūd as a “modulated equivocity of being” rather than as a “modulated univocity of being.” On the one hand, this underscores the continuity with Aristotle’s theory of pros hen predication and its late-antique Greek and early Arabic reception, which Avicenna, as heir to a long commentatorial tradition, reinterprets in his own way. On the other hand, the reading of the asmāʾ mushakkika and tashkīk al-wujūd proposed here may explain some of the origins of the ontological debates on the construal of existence that developed from the post-classical reception of Avicenna’s works.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Afnan, Soheil Muhsin. Philosophical Terminology in Arabic and Persian. Leiden: Brill, 1964.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. Commentary on the Metaphysics. Ed. by Michael Hayduck. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 1. Berlin: Reimer, 1891.
Alpina, Tommaso. Subject, Definition, Activity: Framing Avicenna’s Science of the Soul. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Alpina, Tommaso. “Is Nutrition a Sufficient Condition for Life: Avicenna’s Position between Natural Philosophy and Medicine.” In Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Ed. by Giouli Korobili and Roberto Lo Presti. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020, 221–258.
Ammonius. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.4. Berlin: Reimer, 1895.
Ammonius. Commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.3. Berlin: Reimer, 1891.
Ansari, Rosabel Pauline. The Ambiguity of ‘Being’ in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, 2020.
Averroes, see Ibn Rushd
Avicenna, see Ibn Sīnā
Benevich, Fedor. “The Necessary Existent (wājib al-wujūd): From Avicenna to Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī.” In Philosophical Theology in Islam: Later Ashʿarism East and West. Ed. by Ayman Shihadeh and Jan Thiele. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 123–155.
Benevich, Fedor. Essentialität und Notwendigkeit: Avicenna und die aristotelische Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
Bertolacci, Amos. “The ‘Ontologization’ of Logic. Metaphysical Themes in Avicenna’s Reworking of the Organon.” In Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500. Ed. by Margaret Cameron and John Marenbon. Leiden: Brill, 2010, 25–51.
Bonmariage, Cécile. Le réel et les réalités: Mullā Ṣadrā Shīrāzī et la structure de la réalité. Paris: Vrin, 2007.
De Haan, Daniel. “The Doctrine of the Analogy of Being in Avicenna’s Metaphysics of the Healing.” The Review of Metaphysics 69.2 (2015): 261–286.
Dexippus. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.2. Berlin: Reimer, 1888.
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. “Ibn Sīnā and the Ambiguity of Being’s Univocity.” In Views on the Philosophy of Ibn Sīnā and Mulla Ṣadrā Shīrāzī. Ed. by Mokda Arfa Mensia. Carthage: Tunisian Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, 2014, 15–24.
Esots, Janis. “The Principle of the Systematic Ambiguity of Existence in the Philosophy of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra.” Afkar (Journal of ʿAqida and Islamic Thought) 6 (2005): 161–170.
Fārābī. Alfarabi’s Book of Letters (Kitāb al-Ḥurūf). Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ed., intro., and annot. by Muhsin Mahdi. Beirut: Dar el-Mashreq Publishers (Imprimerie catholique), 1969.
Fārābī. Fī aghrāḍ al-ḥakīm fī kull maqāla min al-kitāb al-mawsūm bi-l-ḥurūf. Ed. by Friedrich Dieterici. Leiden: Brill, 1892, 34–38.
Goichon, Amélie-Marie. Vocabulaires comparés d’Aristote et d’Ibn Sīnā: Supplément au Lexique de la langue philosophique d’Ibn Sīnā (Avicenne). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1939.
Goichon, Amélie-Marie. Lexique de la langue philosophique d’Ibn Sīnā (Avicenne). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1938.
Griffel, Frank. “Ismāʿīlite Critique of Ibn Sīnā: al-Shahrastānī’s (d. 1153) Wrestling Match with the Philosophers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy. Ed. by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 210–232.
Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Second, Revised and Enlarged Edition, Including an Inventory of Avicenna’s Authentic Works. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Hintikka, Kaarlo Jaakko. “Different Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9.3 (1971): 368–372.
Ibn Rushd. Averroès. Tafsir ma baʿd at-tabiʿat. Texte arabe inédit établi par Maurice Bouyges, 4 vols. Beyrouth: Imprimerie catholique, 1938.
Ibn Sīnā. al-Taʿlīqāt. Ed. by Seyyed Hossein Mousavian. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy, 2013.
Ibn Sīnā. The Physics of The Healing (al-Shifāʾ, al-Samāʿ al-ṭabīʿī), Books I & II. A parallel English-Arabic text. Transl., intro., and annot. by Jon McGinnis. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2009.
Ibn Sīnā. The Metaphysics of The Healing (al-Shifāʾ, al-ilāhiyyāt). A parallel English-Arabic text. Transl., intro., and annot. by Michael E. Marmura. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2005.
Ibn Sīnā. Ibn Sînâ: Lettre au Vizir Abû Saʿd. Editio princeps d’après le manuscrit de Bursa, traduction de l’arabe, introduction, note et lexique par Yahya Michot. Beyrouth: Les éditions al-Bouraq, 2000.
Ibn Sīnā. al-Mubāḥathāt. Ed. by Moḥsen Bīdārfar. Qum: Enteshārāt-e bīdār, 1992.
Ibn Sīnā. al-Najāt. Ed. by Moḥammad Taqī Dāneshpajūh. Tehran: Enteshārāt-e dāneshgāh, 1985.
Ibn Sīnā. Tafsīr Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ. In al-Tafsīr al-Qurʾānī wa-l-lugha al-ṣūfiyya fī falsafat Ibn Sīnā. Ed. by Ḥasan ʿĀṣī. Beirut: al-Muʾassasa al-jāmiʿiyya li-l-dirāsāt wa-l-nashr wa-l-tawzīʿ, 1983, 104–113.
Ibn Sīnā. ʿUyūn al-ḥikma. Ed. by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī, Second edition. Beirut: Dār al-qalam, 1980.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Hidāya. Ed. by Muḥammad ʿAbduh. Cairo: Maktabat al-qāhira al-ḥadītha, 1974.
Ibn Sīnā. al-Masāʾil al-gharība al-ʿishrīniyya. Ed. by Moḥammad Taqī Dāneshpajūh. In Collected Texts and Papers on Logic and Language. Ed. by Mehdi Mohaghegh and Toshihiko Izutsu. Tehran: Enteshārāt-e Dāneshgāh, 1974, 79–103.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-ʿIbāra. Ed. by Maḥmūd al-Khuḍayrī. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-miṣriyya al-ʿāmma li-l-taʾlīf wa-l-nashr, 1970.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Jadal. Ed. by Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿāmma li-shuʾūn al-maṭābiʿ al-amīriyya, 1965.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Qiyās. Ed. by Saʿīd Zāyid. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿāmma li-shuʾūn al-maṭābiʿ al-amīriyya, 1964.
Ibn Sīnā. Livre des définitions [Kitāb al-Ḥudūd]. Ed., transl., and annot. by Amélie-Marie Goichon. Cairo: Publications de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale du Caire, 1963.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Maqūlāt. Ed. by al-Ab Qanawātī, Maḥmūd al-Khuḍayrī, Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī, and Saʿīd Zāyid. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿāmma li-shuʾūn al-maṭābiʿ al-amīriyya, 1959.
Ibn Sīnā. Avicenna’s De Anima (Arabic Text): Being the Psychological Part of Kitāb al-Shifāʾ. Ed. by Fazlur Rahman. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Burhān. Ed. by Abū l-ʿAlā ʿAfīfī. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīriyya, 1956.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Madkhal. Ed. by al-Ab Qanawātī, Maḥmūd al-Khuḍayrī and Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿāmma li-shuʾūn al-maṭābiʿ al-amīriyya, 1952.
Ibn Sīnā. Dāneshnāmeh-ye ʿAlāʾī, Ilāhiyyāt. Ed. by Muḥammad Muʿīn. Tehran: Dāneshgāh-ye Tehrān, 1952.
Ibn Sīnā. Aḥwāl al-nafs. Ed. by Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī. Cairo: Dār iḥyāʾ al-kutub al-ʿarabiyya, 1952.
Ibn al-Ṭayyib, Abū l-Faraj. Der Kategorienkommentar von Abū l-Faraǧ ʿAbdallāh ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib. Ed. and annot. by Cleophea Ferrari. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Ibn al-Ṭayyib, Abū l-Faraj. Tafsīr Kitāb Īsāghūjī li-Furfūriyūs. Ed. by Kwame Gyekye. Beirut: Dār al-mashriq, 1975.
Irwin, Terence Henry. “Homonymy in Aristotle.” The Review of Metaphysics 34.3 (1981): 523–544.
Janos, Damien. “Tashkīk al-wujūd and the lawāzim in Avicenna’s Metaphysics.” Forthcoming.
Janos, Damien. Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Johannessen, Timothy Mark. The Avicennian Moment: Separation and the Science of Being (qua Being) in Aristotle and Avicenna. Ph.D. dissertation, Asia Institute, University of Melbourne, 2019.
Jurjānī, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Muʿjam al-taʿrīfāt. Ed. by Muḥammad Ṣiddīq al-Minshāwī. Cairo: Dār al-faḍīla, 2004.
Key, Alexander. Language between God and the Poets: Maʿnā in the Eleventh Century. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.
Kalbarczyk, Alexander. Predication and Ontology: Studies and Texts on Avicennian and Post-Avicennian Readings of Aristotle’s Categories. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
Kalbarczyk, Alexander. “The Kitāb al-Maqūlāt of the Muḫtaṣar al-awsaṭ fī l-manṭiq: A Hitherto Unknown Source for Studying Ibn Sīnā’s Reception of Aristotle’s Categories.” Oriens 40 (2012): 305–354.
Lewis, Frank A. “Aristotle on the Homonymy of Being.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68.1 (2004): 1–36.
Lizzini, Olga. “Ibn Sīnā’s Metaphysics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015, revised 2020). Retrieved 7/21/2021 via https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina-metaphysics/
Lizzini, Olga. “Wuǧūd-Mawǧūd / Existence-Existent in Avicenna: A Key Ontological Notion of Arabic Philosophy.” Quaestio 3 (2003): 111–138.
Menn, Stephen. “Avicenna’s Metaphysics.” In Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays. Ed. by Peter Adamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 143–169.
Menn, Stephen and Robert Wisnovsky. “Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī On the Four Scientific Questions Concerning the Three Kinds of Existence. Editio princeps and Translation.” Mélanges de l’Institut dominicain d’études orientales du Caire (MIDEO) 29 (2012): 73–96.
Philoponus. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 13.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1898.
Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. Transl. by Steven K. Strange. London: Bloomsbury, 1992.
Porphyry. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1887.
Porphyry. Commentary on the Eisagoge. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1887.
Rashed, Marwan. “Ibn ʿAdī et Avicenne: sur les types d’existants.” In Aristotele e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici: logica e ontologia nelle interpretazioni greche e arabe. Ed. by Vincenza Celluprica and Cristina D’Ancona with the collaboration of Riccardo Chiaradonna. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2004, 107–171.
Rizvi, Sajjad. Mullā Ṣadrā and Metaphysics: Modulation of Being. London: Routledge, 2009.
Schöck, Cornelia. Koranexegese, Grammatik und Logik: zum Verhältnis von arabischer und aristotelischer Urteils-, Konsequenz- und Schlußlehre. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Shields, Christopher. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. Transl. by Michael Chase. London: Bloomsbury, 2003.
Simplicius. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Carolus Kalbfleisch. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 8. Berlin: Reimer, 1907.
Tolkiehn, Niels. The Notions of Homonymy, Synonymy, Multivocity, and Pros Hen in Aristotle. Ph.D. dissertation. Dissertationen der LMU München, vol. 37. Munich: Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2019.
Treiger, Alexander. “Avicenna’s Notion of Transcendental Modulation of Existence (taškīk al-wuğūd, analogia entis) and its Greek and Arabic Sources.” In Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Studies in Honor of Dimitri Gutas. Ed. by Felicitas Opwis and David Reisman. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 327–363.
Vallat, Philippe. Farabi et l’école d’Alexandrie: des prémisses de la connaissance à la philosophie politique. Paris: Vrin, 2004.
Ward, Julie K. Aristotle on Homonymy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Wisnovsky, Robert. “On the Emergence of Maragha Avicennism.” Oriens 46 (2018): 263–331.
Wisnovsky, Robert. Avicenna’s Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. “The Amphibolous Terms in Aristotle, Arabic Philosophy and Maimonides.” The Harvard Theological Review 31.2 (1938): 151–173.
Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī. Fī tabyīn wujūd al-umūr al-ʿāmmiyya. In Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī. The Philosophical Treatises. Ed. by Saḥbān Khalīfāt. Amman: Department of Philosophy, University of Jordan, 1988, 148–159.
Zamboni, Francesco Omar. “Is Existence One or Manifold? Avicenna and his Early Interpreters on the Modulation of Existence (taškīk al-wuǧūd).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31 (2020): 121–149.
Zimmermann, Fritz W. al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 505 | 181 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 185 | 167 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 485 | 425 | 6 |
This study investigates Avicenna’s conception of philosophical terminology through an analysis of the relation between equivocity (ishtirāk) and modulation (tashkīk) and by drawing evidence from a broad array of logical, physical, and metaphysical texts. In so doing, it also re-examines the notion of the modulation of existence (tashkīk al-wujūd). Although the intrinsic definitional ambiguity of tashkīk makes it possible to approach it alternatively through the lens of univocity and equivocity, there are strong textual and philosophical reasons to believe that Avicenna preferred to regard tashkīk as a kind of moderate equivocity, as opposed to both univocity and a kind of pure or absolute equivocity. As a corollary, it is preferable to construe tashkīk al-wujūd as a “modulated equivocity of being” rather than as a “modulated univocity of being.” On the one hand, this underscores the continuity with Aristotle’s theory of pros hen predication and its late-antique Greek and early Arabic reception, which Avicenna, as heir to a long commentatorial tradition, reinterprets in his own way. On the other hand, the reading of the asmāʾ mushakkika and tashkīk al-wujūd proposed here may explain some of the origins of the ontological debates on the construal of existence that developed from the post-classical reception of Avicenna’s works.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 505 | 181 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 185 | 167 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 485 | 425 | 6 |