The debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn (“on the subjects of medicine”) were initiated by Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī and continued by Afḍal al-Dīn al-Ḫūnaǧī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-Naḫǧawānī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-Sāmirī, Rafīʿ al-Dīn al-Ǧīlī, Ibn al-Nafīs, and Ibn al-Quff al-Masīḥī. In his own commentary, entitled al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya, Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī preserved and scrutinized his predecessors’ commentaries, in order to offer what he believed to be more conclusive interpretations of Ibn Sīnā. Focusing on the introductory part of Kulliyyāt I.1.ii, we show that the commentators were divided not only on philosophical issues, but also on the very text that should be attributed to Ibn Sīnā.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ḫūnaǧī, Afḍal al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Arabe MS 2937.
Ḫūnaǧī, Afḍal al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Arabe MS 2938.
Ibn al-Nafīs. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Köprülü Kütüphanesi, Fazıl Ahmed Paşa MS 969.
Ibn al-Nafīs. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Fatih MS 3573.
Ibn al-Nafīs. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Şehit Ali Paşa MS 2052.
Ibn al-Nafīs. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. London, Wellcome Historical Medical Library MS Or. 51.
Masīḥī, Abū al-Faraǧ Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Damascus, Dār al-kutub al-ẓāhiriyya MS 7802.
Naḫǧawānī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya MS 3545.
Naḫǧawānī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya MS 3721.
Naḫǧawānī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Arabe MS 2936.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Gotha, Universität Erfurt, Forschungsbibliothek Gotha, Orientalische Handschriften MS A-1916.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Damascus, Dār al-kutub al-ẓāhiriyya MS 3142.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Damascus, Dār al-kutub al-ẓāhiriyya MS 3143.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Manisa, İl Halk Kütüphanesi MS1767.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Arch Selden MS A.64.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Arabe MS 6845.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Tehran, Dānišgāh-i Tihrān, Kitābḫāna-yi markazī MS 7815.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Tehran, Dānišgāh-i Tihrān, Kitābḫāna-yi markazī MS 451.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Tehran, Kitābḫāna-yi Maǧlis-i šūrā-yi islāmī, Šūrā MS 6739.
Sāmirī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Dublin, Chester Beatty Library, Arabic MS 3789.
Sāmirī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Istanbul, Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Ahmet III MS 1946.
Sāmirī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-. Commentary on the Canon of Medicine. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Marsh MS 464.
Sāwī, Zayn al-Dīn ʿUmar ibn Sahlān al-. al-Baṣāʾir al-naṣīriyya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Fatih MS 3217.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Istanbul, Millet Kütüphanesi, Feyzullah Efendi MS 1317.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Istanbul, Nuruosmaniye Kütüphanesi MS 3467.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Ayasofya MS 3649.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Istanbul, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Şehit Ali Paşa MS 2047.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Arabe MS 2940.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Tehran, Kitābḫāna-yi Markaz-i dāʾirat al-maʿārif-i buzurg-i islāmī MS 525.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Tehran, Kitābḫāna-yi Maǧlis-i šūrā-yi islāmī, Ṭabāṭabāʾī MS 1061.
Šīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya. Tehran, Kitābḫāna wa mūza-yi millī-yi Malik MS 4294.
Bauden, Frédéric. “Maqriziana IX: Should al-Maqrīzī Be Thrown Out with the Bath Water? The Question of His Plagiarism of al-Awḥadī’s Khiṭaṭ and the Documentary Evidence.” Mamlūk Studies Review XIV (2010): 159–232.
Di Vincenzo, Silvia. Avicenna, The Healing, Logic: Isagoge. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Eshera, Osama. “The Composition and Transmission of Avicenna’s Najāt, Ilāhiyyāt and al-Mabdaʾ wa-l-maʿād: Critical Edition.” Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, 2022.
Fancy, Nahyan. “Post-Avicennan Physics in the Medical Commentaries of the Mamluk Period.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 6, nos. 1–2 (2018): 55–81.
Fancy, Nahyan. “Verification and Utility in the Arabic Commentaries on the Canon of Medicine: Examples from the Works of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210) and Ibn al-Nafīs (d. 1288).” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 75, no. 4 (2020): 361–382.
Forcada, Miquel. “Ibn Bājja on Medicine and Medical Experience.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 21, no. 1 (2011): 111–148.
Galen. On the Constitution of the Art of Medicine, The Art of Medicine, A Method of Medicine to Glaucon. Edited and translated by Ian Johnston. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2016.
Ḥillī, al-ʿAllāma al-. al-Qawāʿid al-ǧaliyya fī šarḥ al-Risāla al-Šamsiyya. Edited by Fāris Tabrīziyān. Qom: Muʾassasat al-našr al-islāmī, 1432/2010–11.
Ibn Sīnā. Kitāb al-Qānūn fī l-ṭibb. Rome: Typographia Medicea, 1593.
Ibn Sīnā. al-Šifāʾ, al-Manṭiq, al-Burhān. Edited by Abū l-ʿAlāʾ ʿAfīfī and Ibrāhīm Madkūr. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīriyya, 1956.
Ǧurǧānī, al-Sayyid al-Šarīf al-. al-Taʿrīfāt. Edited by ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ʿUmayra. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-kitāb, 1987.
Karimullah, Kamran. “Avicenna and Galen, Philosophy and Medicine: Contextualising Discussions of Medical Experience in Medieval Islamic Physicians and Philosophers.” Oriens 45, nos. 1–2 (2017): 105–149.
Karimullah, Kamran. “The Emergence of Verification (taḥqīq) in Islamic Medicine.” Oriens 47, nos. 1–2 (2019): 1–113.
Nikfahm-Khubravan, Sajjad. “The Reception of Ptolemy’s Latitude Theories in Islamic Astronomy.” Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, 2022.
Rāzī, Faḫr al-Dīn al-. al-Mabāḥiṯ al-mašriqiyya fī ʿilm al-ilāhiyyāt wa-l-ṭabīʿiyyāt. Vol. 1. Hyderabad: Maṭbaʿat Maǧlis dāʾirat al-maʿārif al-niẓāmiyya, 1343/1923–24.
Rāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-. al-Muḥākamāt bayna šarḥay al-Išārāt. Qom: Našr al-balāġa, 1375/1996–97.
Savadi, Fateme. “The Historical and Cosmographical Context of Hayʾat al-arḍ with a Focus on Quṭb al-Dīn Shīrāzī’s Nihāyat al-idrāk.” Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, 2019.
Savadi, Fateme, and Osama Eshera. “Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s Commentary on Avicenna’s Qānūn in Historical Context: Edition and Translation of the Preface.” Forthcoming.
Savadi, Fateme, and Sajjad Nikfahm-Khubravan. “Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s Adversary in Faʿalta fa-lā talum.” Forthcoming.
Sāwī, Ibn Sahlān al-. al-Baṣāʾir al-naṣīriyya fī ʿilm al-manṭiq. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbduh. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīriyya, 1898.
Tahānawī, Muḥammad ʿAlī al-. Mawsūʿat Kaššāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn wa-l-ʿulūm. Edited by ʿAlī Farīd Daḥrūj. Vol. 1. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān, 1996.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 336 | 216 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 235 | 17 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 600 | 232 | 1 |
The debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn (“on the subjects of medicine”) were initiated by Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī and continued by Afḍal al-Dīn al-Ḫūnaǧī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-Naḫǧawānī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-Sāmirī, Rafīʿ al-Dīn al-Ǧīlī, Ibn al-Nafīs, and Ibn al-Quff al-Masīḥī. In his own commentary, entitled al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya, Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī preserved and scrutinized his predecessors’ commentaries, in order to offer what he believed to be more conclusive interpretations of Ibn Sīnā. Focusing on the introductory part of Kulliyyāt I.1.ii, we show that the commentators were divided not only on philosophical issues, but also on the very text that should be attributed to Ibn Sīnā.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 336 | 216 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 235 | 17 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 600 | 232 | 1 |