Decentering Agency in North-South Solidarity: Arguing with My Past Self
In: Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS)Search for other papers by Felix Anderl in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The “Global Justice Movement” lived on the conviction that more transnational activism is normatively desirable. But after the postcolonial critique of global justice activism, the problem of hierarchy within movements has shaped the political consciousness of many activists in North-South solidarity, mainstreaming the worry that transnational solidarity mainly serves to feed the good conscience of Western liberals, consequently erasing the agency of Southern “partners”. Many movements are anxious about faux solidarity. This paper investigates what this anxiousness does in practice. Participant observation in a transnational advocacy network shows that while the liberal cooperation discourse reproduced transnational hierarchies when assuming the basic sameness of actors (no problematization of agency), the critique of these practices can reproduce marginalization of Southern activists by assuming their subordination in contexts of transnational solidarity (overproblematization of agency). While cosmopolitan assumptions encourage unreflexive cooperation based on superficial commonality, their critique can produce superficial reflexivity by reifying difference and undermining collective action. Focusing on my own failure to establish a level playing field through techniques derived from the critical whiteness discourse, this paper offers auto-ethnographic insights into the challenges of restoring agency in the global South. The article makes an argument about undermining non-Western agency in the course of trying to facilitate it. Instead of appealing to the theoretical/logical registers of the audience, it involves readers in the dilemmas of transnational solidarity projects and attempts to encourage reflexive processes that go beyond binary North-South narratives, suggesting the writing practice of ‘arguing by experience’.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alcoff, Linda. 1992. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique 20 (5).
-
Alejandro, Audrey (2019). Western dominance in international relations? The internationalisation ofirin Brazil and India. Routledge.
-
Anderl, Felix. 2022. Broken Solidarities. How Open Global Governance Divides and Rules. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
-
Beck, Ulrich. 2009. “Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision.” Constellations 16(1): 3–22.
-
Choudry, Aziz, and Dip Kapoor. 2013. NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. London: Zed Books.
-
Conway, Janet. 2009. “Indigenizing the Global at the World Social Forum.” Alternatives International. https://www.alterinter.org/?Indigenizing-the-global-at-the-World-Social-Forum.
-
Conway, Janet. 2011a. “Activist Knowledges on the Anti-Globalization Terrain: Transnational Feminisms at the World Social Forum.” Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 3(2): 33–64.
-
Conway, Janet. 2011b. “Cosmopolitan or Colonial? The World Social Forum as ‘Contact Zone.’” Third World Quarterly 32(2): 217–36.
-
Conway, Janet. 2013. Edges of Global Justice: The World Social Forum and Its “Others.” London: Routledge.
-
Dany, Charlotte. 2014. Janus-faced ngo Participation in Global Governance: Structural Constraints for ngo Influence. Global Governance, 20(3), 419–436.
-
della Porta, Donatella, Massimiliano Andretta, Lorenzo Mosca, and Herbert Reiter. 2007. Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
de Waardt, Mijke, & Willems, Eva (2022). Recipients versus participants: Politics of aid and victim representation in transitional justice practices in Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 44(2), 339–363.
-
Dean, Jodi. 2019. Comrade. An Essay on Political Belonging. Verso.
-
Dhawan, Nikita. 2013. “Coercive Cosmopolitanism and Impossible Solidarities.” Qui Parle 22(1): 139–66.
-
Engels, Bettina; Dietz, Kristina. 2017. Contested Extractivism, Society and the State. Struggles over Mining and Land. Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Erikson Baaz, Maria. 2006. The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid. Zed Books.
-
Fiedlschuster, Micha. 2018. Globalization, EU Democracy Assistance and the World Social Forum. Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave. London.
-
Garbe, Sebastian. 2023. An Autoethnography of and in Solidarity: Post- and Decolonial Critique and Autoethnographic Positioning Analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231196918.
-
Gazzotti, Lorena. 2021. Immigration Nation: Aid, Control, and Border Politics in Morocco. Cambridge University Press.
-
Gill, Stephen. 2000. “Toward a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation.” Millenium 29(1): 131–40.
-
incite! Women of Color Against Violence. 2017. The Revolution will not be funded. Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex. Duke University Press.
-
Kaldor, Mary. 2000. “‘Civilising’ Globalisation? The Implications of the ‘Battle in Seattle’.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(1): 105–14.
-
Kaldor, Mary. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge M.A.: Polity.
-
Leinius, Johanna. 2020. “Methodologies of Resistance: Facilitating Solidarity across Difference in Inter-Movement Encounters.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 20(1): 117–49.
-
Mahrouse, Gada. 2014. Conflicted Commitments. Race, Privilege, and Power in Solidarity Activism. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
-
Martin de Almagro, Maria. 2018. “Lost Boomerangs, the Rebound Effect and Transnational Advocacy Networks: A Discursive Approach to Norm Diffusion.” Review of International Studies 44(4): 672–93.
-
Menzel, Anne. 2018. The perils of recognising local agency: a situational concept of agency and the case of victims of sexual violence and the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission (trc). Journal of International Relations and Development, 23, 584–606
-
Mohanty, Chandra T. 1991. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, eds. Chandra T. Mohanty, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 51–80.
-
Roldán Mendívil, Eleonira; Sarbo, Bafta. 2020. Die Diversität der Ausbeutung. Zur Kritik des herrschenden Antirassismus. Dietz.
-
Roshanravan, Shireen. 2014. “Motivating Coalition: Women of Color and Epistemic Disobedience.” Hypatia 29(1): 41–58.
-
Rothberg, Michael. 2019. The Implicated Subject. Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford: Stanford Universty Press.
-
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
-
Spivak, Gayatri. 1993. Can the Subaltern Speak?, in: Patrick Williams and Laure Chrisman (eds.): Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Tsing, Anna L. 2005. Friction. An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press.
-
Vargas, Virginia. 2010. “Feminism, Globalization and the Global Justice and Solidarity Movement.” Cultural Studies17(6): 905–20.
-
Wallace, Tine. 2004. ngo Dilemmas: Trojan Horses for Global Neoliberalism? Socialist Register (40): The New Imperial Challenge, 202–219.
-
Witt, Antonia, Anderl, Felix, Acharya, Amityv, Shahi, Deepshiskha, Kamola, Isaac, & Cornelissen, Scarlett (2022). How to Problematize the Global? Millennium, 51(1), 33–80.
-
Wolkenhauer, Anna; Berten, John. 2023. Reflexivity in global social policy: Introduction to the special issue. Global Social Policy. Online first: 1–18.
-
World March of Women. 2001. “Violence against Women: The ‘Other’ World Must Act.” In Another World Is Possible. Popular Alternatives to Globalization at the World Social Forum, eds. William F Fisher and Thomas Ponniah. London: Zed Books, 218–35.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 341 | 341 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 15 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 38 | 38 | 0 |
Decentering Agency in North-South Solidarity: Arguing with My Past Self
In: Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS)Search for other papers by Felix Anderl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The “Global Justice Movement” lived on the conviction that more transnational activism is normatively desirable. But after the postcolonial critique of global justice activism, the problem of hierarchy within movements has shaped the political consciousness of many activists in North-South solidarity, mainstreaming the worry that transnational solidarity mainly serves to feed the good conscience of Western liberals, consequently erasing the agency of Southern “partners”. Many movements are anxious about faux solidarity. This paper investigates what this anxiousness does in practice. Participant observation in a transnational advocacy network shows that while the liberal cooperation discourse reproduced transnational hierarchies when assuming the basic sameness of actors (no problematization of agency), the critique of these practices can reproduce marginalization of Southern activists by assuming their subordination in contexts of transnational solidarity (overproblematization of agency). While cosmopolitan assumptions encourage unreflexive cooperation based on superficial commonality, their critique can produce superficial reflexivity by reifying difference and undermining collective action. Focusing on my own failure to establish a level playing field through techniques derived from the critical whiteness discourse, this paper offers auto-ethnographic insights into the challenges of restoring agency in the global South. The article makes an argument about undermining non-Western agency in the course of trying to facilitate it. Instead of appealing to the theoretical/logical registers of the audience, it involves readers in the dilemmas of transnational solidarity projects and attempts to encourage reflexive processes that go beyond binary North-South narratives, suggesting the writing practice of ‘arguing by experience’.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 341 | 341 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 15 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 38 | 38 | 0 |