Is There an Alternative to Consensus? The Impact of the 2014 Coalition Deal on Voting Behaviour in the Eighth European Parliament (2014–2019)
In: International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesCollege of Europe, Bruges, Belgium
Search for other papers by Olivier Costa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Awenig Marié in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Consensus is a key feature of the European Union. In the European Parliament, most legislation is adopted by a grand coalition between the left and the right. While this trans-partisan cooperation has always been informal, the epp and s&d groups agreed on a formal political coalition in 2014. For the first time in the ep’s history, this grand coalition was based on a policy programme negotiated by the two groups’ leadership. Based on roll-call vote data, this paper aims to understand the impact of this deal on actual coalition-building in the ep plenary. We find that the 2014 coalition deal provided a framework that incentivises legislative actors to increase their levels of cooperation on the issues on which they usually cooperate the least.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Attinà, F. (1990). The Voting Behaviour of the European Parliament Members and the Problem of the Europarties. European Journal of Political Research 18(4), pp. 557–79.
-
Behm, A.-S., and Brack, N. (2019). Sheep in wolf’s clothing? Comparing eurosceptic and non-eurosceptic mep s’ parliamentary behaviour. Journal of European Integration 41(8), pp. 1069–88.
-
Bendjaballah, S. (2016). Des illusions perdues? Du compromis au consensus au Parlement européen et à la chambre des représentants américaine. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
-
Bendjaballah, S., Novak, S., and Rozenberg, O. (2020). Uni par l’adversité ? Le consensus au Parlement européen. Revue de l’Union européenne 637, pp. 220–228.
-
Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(4), pp. 703–22.
-
Börzel, T. A., and Risse, T. (2018). From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1), pp. 83–108.
-
Bowler, S., and McElroy, G. (2015). Political Group Cohesion and ‘Hurrah’ Voting in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy 22(9), pp. 1355–1365.
-
Brack, N. (2011). S’opposer au sein du Parlement européen: Le cas des eurosceptiques. Revue internationale de politique comparée 18(2), pp. 131–147.
-
Brack, N. (2013). Euroscepticism at the supranational level: the case of the ‘untidy right’ in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1), pp. 85–104.
-
Brack, N., and Costa, O. (2018). Democracy in parliament vs. democracy through parliament? Defining the rules of the game in the European Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 24(1), pp. 51–71.
-
Brack, N., and Startin, N. (2015). Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review 36(3), pp. 239–249.
-
Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., and Reh, C. (2015). The impact of informalisation: Early agreements and voting cohesion in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 17(1), pp. 91–113.
-
Burns, C. (2013). Consensus and compromise become ordinary – but at what cost? A critical analysis of the impact of the changing norms of codecision upon European Parliament committees. Journal of European Public Policy 20(7), pp. 988–1005.
-
Carruba, C., Gabel, M., Murray, L., Clough, R., Montgomery, E., and Schambach, R. (2006). Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 36(4), pp. 691–704.
-
Christiansen, T. (2016). After the Spitzenkandidaten: fundamental change in the EU’s political system?. West European Politics 39(5), pp. 992–1010.
-
Clinton, J. D. (2012). Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1), pp. 79–99.
-
Corbett, R. (1998). The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
-
Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M. (2007). The European Parliament, London: J. Harper.
-
Costa, O. (2001). Le Parlement européen, assemblée délibérante, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
-
Costa, O., and Magnette, P. (2003). The European Union as consociation? A methodological assessment. West European Politics 26(3), pp. 1–18.
-
Costello, R. (2011). Does Bicameralism Promote Stability? Inter-institutional Relations and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics 34(1), pp. 122–144.
-
Dehousse, R. (1995). Constitutional Reform in the European Community: Are There Alternatives to the Majoritarian Avenue?. West European Politics 18(3), pp. 118–136.
-
Depauw, S. (2003). Government Party Discipline in Parliamentary Democracies: the Cases of Belgium, France and the United Kingdom in the 1990s. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9(4), pp.130–146.
-
De Swaan, A. (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
-
Elgström, O., & C. Jönsson. (2000). Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or Problem-solving?. Journal of European Public Policy 7(5), pp. 684–704.
-
Font, N. (2020). Competing Principals and Non-Vote Decisions in the European Parliament. Parliamentary Affairs 73(1), pp. 166–185.
-
Guinaudeau, I., and Costa, O. (2021). Issue Politicization in the European Parliament. An Analysis of Parliamentary Questions for Oral Answer (2004–19). Journal of Common Market Studies, online version.
-
Hagemann, S., and Høyland, B. (2010). Bicameral Politics in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4), pp. 811–833.
-
Hix, S. (2008). What’s Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Hix, S. (2009). What to Expect in the 2009–14 European Parliament: Return of the Grand Coalition?. European Policy Analysis, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, August 8.
-
Hix, S., and Høyland, B. (2013). Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science 16(1), pp. 171–189.
-
Hix, S., Kreppel, A., and Noury, A. (2003). The Party System in the European Parliament: Collusive or Competitive?. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2), pp. 309–331.
-
Hix, S., and Lord, C. (1997). Political Parties in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2005). Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. British Journal of Political Science 35(2), pp. 209–234.
-
Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2009). Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament. Phil. Trans. R. Soc B. 364, pp. 821–831.
-
Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2019). Changing Political Cleavages in Advanced Democracies: Evidence from the European Parliament. Working paper. Available at: https://eml.berkeley.edu/~groland/pubs/HNR4_14JAN2019.pdf.
-
Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1), pp. 1–23.
-
Høyland, B. (2010). Procedural and party effects in European Parliament roll-call votes. European Union Politics 11(4), pp. 597–513.
-
Hug, S. (2009). Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes. British Journal of Political Science 40(1), pp. 225–235.
-
Hurka, S. (2013). Changing the output: The logic of amendment success in the European Parliament’s envi Committee. European Union Politics 14(2), pp. 273–296.
-
Kaniok, P., and Mocek, O. (2017). Roll Call Votes in the European Parliament: a good sample or a poisoned dead end?. Parliaments, Estates and Representation 37(1), pp. 75–88.
-
Koop, C., Reh, C., and Bressanelli, E. (2018). When politics prevails: Parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research 57(3), maripp. 563–586.
-
Kreppel, A. (2000). Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 1(3), pp. 340–362.
-
Kreppel, A., and Hix, S. (2003). From ‘grand coalition’ to left-right confrontation. Explaining the shifting structure of party competition in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 36(1–2), pp. 75–96.
-
Kreppel, A., and Tsebelis, G. (1999). Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. Comparative Political Studies 32(8), pp. 933–66.
-
Kreppel, A., and Webb, M. (2019). European Parliament resolutions – effective agenda setting or whistling into the wind?. Journal of European Integration 41(3), pp. 383–4s04.
-
Lees, C. (2010). The Grand Coalition and the Party System. German Politics 19(3–4), pp. 321–331.
-
Lindstädt, R., Slapin, J.B., and Vander Wielen, R. (2011). Balancing competing demands: Position taking and election proximity in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1), pp. 37–70.
-
MacRae, D. (1958). Dimensions of congressional voting: A statistical study of the House of Representatives in the Eighty-first Congress. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Mair, P. (2007). Political Opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition 42(1), pp. 1–17.
-
Marié, A. (2019). European Parliament: Is the grand coalition really a thing of the past?. Bruges Political Research Papers 75, pp. 1–31.
-
Mattila, M., and Lane, J.-E. (2001). Why Unanimity in the Council?: A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting. European Union Politics 2(1), pp. 31–52.
-
Maurer, A., & Wolf, M. C. (2020). The European Parliament’s right of initiative. European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/655134/IPOL_STU(2020)655134_EN.pdf.
-
Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57(1), pp. 45–56.
-
Morales, L., Pilet, J.-B., and Ruedin, D. (2015). The Gap between Public Preferences and Policies on Immigration: A Comparative Examination of the Effect of Politicisation on Policy Congruence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(9), pp. 1495–1516.
-
Moury, C. (2013). Coalition Government and Party Mandate. How Coalition Agreements Constrain Ministerial Action. New York: Routledge.
-
Mühlböck, M., and Rittberger, B. (2015). The Council, the European Parliament, and the paradox of inter-institutional cooperation. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 19, available at; http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2015-004a.htm.
-
Mühlböck, M., and Yordanova, N. (2017). When legislators choose not to decide: Abstentions in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 18(2), pp. 323–36.
-
Neuhold, C. (2001). The “Legislative Backbone” keeping the Institution upright? The Role of European Parliament Committees in the EU Policy-Making Process. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 5(10).
-
Novak, S. (2013). The silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies 51(6), pp. 1091–1107.
-
Novak, S., Rozenberg, O., and Bendjaballah, S. (2021). Enduring consensus: why the EU legislative process stays the same. Journal of European Integration 43(4), pp. 475–483.
-
Otjes, S., and van der Veer, H. (2016). The Eurozone crisis and the European Parliament’s changing lines of conflict. European Union Politics 17(2), pp. 242–261.
-
Peñalver García, N., and Priestley, J. (2015). The Making of a European President. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
-
Plescia, C., Kritzinger, S., and Spoon, J.-J. (2021). Who’s to blame? How performance evaluation and partisanship influence responsibility attribution in grand coalition governments. European Journal of Political Research, online.
-
Puetter, U. (2012). Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy 19(2), pp. 161–178.
-
Radaelli, C. M. (1999). The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise?. Journal of European Public Policy 6(5), pp. 757–774.
-
Raunio, T. (1997). The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989–94 European Parliament. Aldershot: Ashgate.
-
Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E., and Koop, C. (2013). The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 46(9), pp. 1112–1142.
-
Settembri, P., and Neuhold, C. (2009). Achieving consensus through committees. Does the European Parliament manage?. Journal of Common Market Studies 47(1), pp. 127–151.
-
Strøm, K., and Müller, W. C. (1999). The Keys to Togetherness: Coalition Agreements in Parliamentary Democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies 5(3), pp. 255–82.
-
Thiem, J. (2006). Explaining Roll Call Vote Request in the European Parliament. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung 90.
-
Thierse, S. (2016). Going on record: Revisiting the logic of roll-call vote requests in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 17(2), pp. 219–241.
-
Timmermans, A. (2006). Standing apart and sitting together: Enforcing coalition agreements in multiparty systems. European Journal of Political Research 45(2), pp. 263–283.
-
Tsebelis, G., and Garrett, G. (2000). Legislative Politics in the European Union. European Union Politics 1(1), pp. 9–36.
-
Westlake, M. (1994). A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 711 | 184 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 180 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 20 | 2 |
Is There an Alternative to Consensus? The Impact of the 2014 Coalition Deal on Voting Behaviour in the Eighth European Parliament (2014–2019)
In: International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesCollege of Europe, Bruges, Belgium
Search for other papers by Olivier Costa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Awenig Marié in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Consensus is a key feature of the European Union. In the European Parliament, most legislation is adopted by a grand coalition between the left and the right. While this trans-partisan cooperation has always been informal, the epp and s&d groups agreed on a formal political coalition in 2014. For the first time in the ep’s history, this grand coalition was based on a policy programme negotiated by the two groups’ leadership. Based on roll-call vote data, this paper aims to understand the impact of this deal on actual coalition-building in the ep plenary. We find that the 2014 coalition deal provided a framework that incentivises legislative actors to increase their levels of cooperation on the issues on which they usually cooperate the least.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 711 | 184 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 180 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 20 | 2 |