Comparative Analysis of the Relevance and Priority for Artificial Intelligence Tools, Services and Open Questions in the Hellenic, Argentinian and Canadian Parliaments
In: International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesSearch for other papers by Jörn von Lucke in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Fotios Fitsilis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Stéphane Gagnon in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (ai) is on the rise and already affecting parliaments around the world. In the framework of a long-term and on-going research project, a series of interactive workshops have been organized between 2021 and 2023 in three national parliaments, in Greece, Argentina, and Canada, with the objective to assess the relevance and priority of a pre-defined set of 210 proposals, primarily regarding the use of ai-based tools and services in the parliamentary workspace. Reflection groups within each parliament evaluated these proposals providing invaluable results that can be utilized in manifold ways by the institutions, for instance towards structuring digital strategies, designing future it systems, or training intra-parliamentary stakeholders. This article presents a comparative analysis of the results obtained by all three parliaments. The analysis sheds light in a rapidly developing field of disruptive parliamentary technology (ParlTech) that with define the parliaments of the future.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
An, M., Lin, J., & Luo, X. R. (2024). The impact of human ai skills on organizational innovation: The moderating role of digital organizational culture. Journal of Business Research, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114786.
-
Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024). How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility. Administrative Sciences, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020037.
-
Chatterjee, S., Mikalef, P., Khorana, S., & Kizgin, H. (2024). Assessing the Implementation of ai Integrated crm System for B2C Relationship Management: Integrating Contingency Theory and Dynamic Capability View Theory. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), pp. 967–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10261-w.
-
CityLAB Berlin (2024). Parla. https://www.parla.berlin.
-
Clark, Charles (1989). Brainstorming – How to Create Successful Ideas. Chatsworth: Wilshire Book Company.
-
Dai, Xiudian, & Norton, Philip, eds. (2013). The Internet and parliamentary democracy in Europe: A comparative study of the ethics of political communication in the digital age. Routledge.
-
de Magalhães Santos, L. G. (2023). Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation in Public Sector: Evidence from Brazilian Case Study. In Lindgren I., Csáki C., Kalampokis E., Tambouris E., Janssen M., Zuiderwijk A., Viale Pereira G., & Virkar S. (Eds.), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.: Vol. 14130 lncs, pp. 365–380. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_23.
-
Eom, S.-J., & Kim, S. (2024). The multi-dimensional paradox of ai adoption in the public sector: The Korean experience. In Liao H.-C., Cid D.D., Macadar M.A., & Bernardini F. (Eds.), acm Int. Conf. Proc. Ser., pp. 133–145. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657074.
-
Etscheid, Jan, von Lucke, Jörn, & Stroh, Felix (2020). Künstliche Intelligenz in der öffentlichen Verwaltung, Digitalakademie@BW & Fraunhofer iao, Stuttgart, pp. 11–12.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios (2019). Imposing regulation on advanced algorithms. Cham: Springer.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios (2021). Artificial Intelligence (ai) in Parliaments – Preliminary Analysis of the Eduskunta Experiment. The Journal of Legislative Studies 27(4), pp. 621–633.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios, & Costa, Olivier (2023). Parliamentary administration facing the digital challenge. In: The Routledge Handbook of Parliamentary Administrations, Routledge, pp. 105–120.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios, & de Almeida, Patricia Gomes Rêgo (2024). Artificial intelligence and its regulation in representative institutions. In: Research Handbook on Public Management and Artificial Intelligence, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 151–166.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios, Koryzis, Dimitris, Svolopoulos, Vasilios, & Spiliotopoulos, Dimitris (2017). Implementing digital parliament innovative concepts for citizens and policy makers. In: HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Interacting with Information Systems: 4th International Conference, HCIBGO 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part i 4, Springer International Publishing, pp. 154–170.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios, & Mikros, George (2022). Smart Parliaments: Data-Driven Democracy. Brussels: European Liberal Forum.
-
Fitsilis, Fotios, & Pliakogianni, Athanasia (2021). The Hellenic Parliament’s Response to the covid-19 Pandemic: A Balancing Act between Necessity and Realism. ISLRev 8(1), pp. 19–27.
-
Fitsilis, F., von Lucke, J., De Vrieze, F., Mikros, G., Palmirani, M., Read, A., Schefbeck, G., Pastor y Camarasa, A., Gagnon, S., Alberto de Oliveira Lima, J., Nielfi, A., Theodorakopoulos, G., Aparicio, M. C., de Dios Cincunegui, J., Hershowitz, A., Saks, A., Cekuolis, J., Ruckert, J., Schwartz, E., … Harris, M. (2024). Guidelines for ai in Parliaments. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
-
Griffith, Jeffrey, & Leston-Bandeira, Cristina (2012). How are parliaments using new media to engage with citizens? The Journal of Legislative Studies 18(3–4), pp. 496–513.
-
Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) (3rd ed.). sage Publications.
-
Harris, Marci, & Wilson, Aubrey (2024). Representative Bodies in theaiEra: Insights for Legislatures. Volume 1. Jackson, TN: popvox Foundation.
-
Koryzis, Dimitris, Dalas, Apostolos, Spiliotopoulos, Dimitris, & Fitsilis, Fotios (2021). Parltech: Transformation framework for the digital parliament. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 5(1), 15.
-
Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Amin, S., & Safdar, M. N. (2023). Consequence of Resistance to Change on ai Readiness: Mediating–Moderating Role of Task-oriented Leadership and High-Performance Work System in the Hospitality Sector. sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217731.
-
Maican, C. I., Sumedrea, S., Tecau, A., Nichifor, E., Chitu, I. B., Lixandroiu, R., & Bratucu, G. (2023). Factors Influencing the Behavioural Intention to Use ai-Generated Images in Business: A utaut2 Perspective With Moderators. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.330019.
-
Misuraca, Gianluca, & van Noordt, Colin (2020). aiWatch – Artificial Intelligence in public services: Overview of the use and impact ofaiin public services in the EU. jrc Research Reports jrc120399, Joint Research Centre.
-
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: TheoecdGlobal Parliamentary group onai, https://oecd.ai/en/parliamentary-group-on-ai, last accessed 2024/03/06.
-
Palmirani, Monica, Vitali, Fabio, Van Puymbroeck, Willy, & Nubla Durango, Fernando (2022). Legal Drafting in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Digitisation. Brussels: European Commission.
-
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe [pace] (2020). Artificial Intelligence: Ensuring respect for democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Strasbourg: pace.
-
Pillai, R., Ghanghorkar, Y., Sivathanu, B., Algharabat, R., & Rana, N. P. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence (ai) based employee experience (eex) chatbots. Information Technology and People, 37(1), pp. 449–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2022-0287.
-
Röthig, Peter (1998). Handbuch für Organisationsuntersuchungen in der Bundesverwaltung, 5th Edition. Bonn: Bundesministerium des Innern.
-
Silva, Nádia F. F. da, Silva, Marília Costa R., Pereira, Fabíola S. F., Tarrega, João Pedro M., Beinotti, João Vitor P., Fonseca, Márcio, Andrade, Francisco Edmundo de, & Carvalho, André C. P. de L. F. de (2021). Evaluating Topic Models in Portuguese Political Comments About Bills from Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies. In: Proceedings on Intelligent Systems BRACIS 2021, pp. 104–120, Cham: Springer, pp. 104–120.
-
Singh, K., Chatterjee, S., & Mariani, M. (2024). Applications of generative ai and future organizational performance: The mediating role of explorative and exploitative innovation and the moderating role of ethical dilemmas and environmental dynamism. Technovation, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103021.
-
Souza, Ellen, Vitório, Douglas, Moriyama, Gyovana, Santos, Luiz, Martins, Lucas, Souza, Mariana, Fonseca, Márcio, Félix, Nádia, Carvalho, André C.P.L.F., Albuquerque, Hidelberg O., & Oliveira Adriano L.I. (2021). An Information Retrieval Pipeline for Legislative Documents from the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems 346, Clifton: ios Press, pp. 119–126.
-
Stanford University (2021). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2021. Stanford: Stanford University.
-
Tarasewiez, German (2022). Transformación digital – El futuro ya llegó a lahcdn. Buenos Aires: Cámara de Diputados de la Nación.
-
United Nations (2024). Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development. New York: United Nations General Assembly. http://www.undocs.org/A/78/L.49.
-
von Lucke, J., & Fitsilis, F. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence for Legislation – Thinking About and Selecting Realistic Topics, in: Marijn Janssen et al (Eds.) EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2022 – Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Workshops, Posters, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2022, pp. 32–42.
-
von Lucke, Jörn, & Fitsilis, Fotios (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence in Parliament – The Hellenic Case, in: Ida Lindgren et al. (Eds.): EGOV 2023 – Electronic Government – Proceedings, lncs, Volume 14130, pp. 174–191.
-
von Lucke, Jörn, & Fitsilis, Fotios (2024). Einschätzungen aus der argentinischen Abgeordnetenkammer zum Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz in Parlamenten, in: Erich Schweighofer et al (Hrsg.): Language Models – Legal Parrots or more? Proceedings IRIS 2024, pp. 129–144.
-
von Lucke, Jörn, Fitsilis, Fotios, & Gagnon, Stéphane (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in Parliament – The Canadian Case [Manuscript submitted for publication].
-
von Lucke, Jörn, Fitsilis, Fotios, & Etscheid, Jan (2023). Research and Development Agenda for the Use of AI in Parliaments, in: David Duenas Cid et al (Eds.): DGO ‘23 – Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (acm), pp. 423–433.
-
Weber, M., Engert, M., Schaffer, N., Weking, J., & Krcmar, H. (2023). Organizational Capabilities for ai Implementation – Coping with Inscrutability and Data Dependency in ai. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(4), pp. 1549–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10297-y.
-
Xleap (2024). Xleap. https://www.xleap.net.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 427 | 427 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 70 | 70 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 187 | 187 | 19 |
Comparative Analysis of the Relevance and Priority for Artificial Intelligence Tools, Services and Open Questions in the Hellenic, Argentinian and Canadian Parliaments
In: International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesSearch for other papers by Jörn von Lucke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fotios Fitsilis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stéphane Gagnon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (ai) is on the rise and already affecting parliaments around the world. In the framework of a long-term and on-going research project, a series of interactive workshops have been organized between 2021 and 2023 in three national parliaments, in Greece, Argentina, and Canada, with the objective to assess the relevance and priority of a pre-defined set of 210 proposals, primarily regarding the use of ai-based tools and services in the parliamentary workspace. Reflection groups within each parliament evaluated these proposals providing invaluable results that can be utilized in manifold ways by the institutions, for instance towards structuring digital strategies, designing future it systems, or training intra-parliamentary stakeholders. This article presents a comparative analysis of the results obtained by all three parliaments. The analysis sheds light in a rapidly developing field of disruptive parliamentary technology (ParlTech) that with define the parliaments of the future.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 427 | 427 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 70 | 70 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 187 | 187 | 19 |