Save

Improved Russo-Wiberg Model: Unveiling New Dimensions in Parliamentary Question Comparison

In: International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
Author:
Matej Czinege Faculty of Law, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for other papers by Matej Czinege in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This paper proposes an improved model for comparing parliamentary question systems based on their procedural settings. It draws upon a model which was first proposed by Russo and Wiberg (2010). In addition to incorporating new categories for evaluating parliamentary questions, the improved model is also adapted for application to both forms of parliamentary questions in terms of assessing their potentials (informational and confrontational). It is proposed that both oral and written questions be evaluated using identical criteria. Finally, the paper presents a brief case study to demonstrate the application of the modified model and to test whether the proposed criteria should indeed be included in the model.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 118 118 52
Full Text Views 12 12 5
PDF Views & Downloads 30 30 12