Pentecostals and Divine Impassibility: A Response to Daniel Castelo

in Journal of Pentecostal Theology
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article responds to Daniel Castelo's recent recommendation of the doctrine of divine impassibility to Pentecostals. In contrast to Castelo's proposal, this article argues that Pentecostals are justified in dropping the term 'impassibility' and, moreover, that Pentecostals have a pneumatological reason for affirming divine passibility implicit within their spirituality of speaking in tongues.

Pentecostals and Divine Impassibility: A Response to Daniel Castelo

in Journal of Pentecostal Theology

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 32 6
Full Text Views 31 31 9
PDF Downloads 6 6 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0