‘Plant Biotechnology’ Representation and Resistance: A Study of Plant Breeding Community in Bihar, India

in Perspectives on Global Development and Technology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The present study, from a sociology of science and technology perspective, captures the transformation in plant biotechnology that has emerged with the advent of new agricultural technology, and how it is conceived of and practiced by the community of plant breeders in selected scientific institutions under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (icar) and the State Agricultural University (sau) setups located in an agriculturally backward state like Bihar. Focusing on a galaxy of scientists engaged in plant science research in Bihar, the present study captures the responses from plant breeders on the questions surrounding genetically modified crops, intellectual property rights and other contentious issues related to new agricultural technology, especially plant biotechnology. An attempt is also made to explore the nature of scientific collaboration taking place in plant breeding and the motivations of such collaborative practices. The purpose of this study is to understand how plant breeding in Bihar is experientially constituted and politically negotiated along the contours and at the boundaries of national and international development operations, policies, extension agents, and the everyday lives, livelihoods, and aspirations of farmers.

‘Plant Biotechnology’ Representation and Resistance: A Study of Plant Breeding Community in Bihar, India

in Perspectives on Global Development and Technology



BeaverD.RosenR. “Studies in Scientific Collaboration—Part iii: Professionalization and the Natural History of Modern Scientific Co-Authorship.” Scientometrics 1979 1 3 231 245

BloorD. Knowledge and Social Imagery 1991 Chicago University of Chicago Press

BozemanB.CorleyE. “Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital.” Research Policy 2004 33 599 616

BushV. Science: The Endless Frontier 1945 Washington DC United States Government Printing Office

CollinsH. M. “The tea Set; Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks.” Science Studies 1974 4 2 165 186

Government of Bihar A Report of the Special Task Force on Bihar—Bihar Agricultural Development: Opportunities and Challenges 2008 New Delhi

Government of Bihar A Report on Transfer of Technology in Bihar 2009 Kisan Ayog State Farmers Commission Bihar Patna

Government of Bihar Economic Survey of Bihar 2009-10 Patna

Government of Bihar Report of Steering Group on Vision of Agriculture Development in Bihar—Towards Accelerated Agricultural Development in Bihar 2010 Bihar Agricultural Department Government of Bihar

Government of India Survey of Poverty in India 2004-05 New Delhi Planning Commission

Government of India Access to Modern Technology for Farming 2005 nss Report No. 500 Min of Stat and Program Implementation nsso Govt. of India

Government of India Economic Survey of India 2009-10 New Delhi

HeinzeT.KuhlmannS. “Cross Institutional Boundaries: Research Collaboration in German Public Sector Nanoscience.” Research Policy 2008 37 5 888 889 894

KatzJ. S.MartinB. R. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 1997 26 1 1 18

KiddCharles V. “Basic Research—Description versus Definition.” Science 1959 129 3346 368 371

KloppenburgJ. R.Jr. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology in India 1492-2000 2004 London The University of Wisconsin Press

KrippendorffK. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology 2003 New Delhi Sage Publications

LeeS.BozemanB. “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity.” Social Studies of Science 2005 35 5 673 702

Loan-ClarkeJ.PrestonD. “Tensions and Benefits in Collaborative Research Involving a University and another Organisation.” Studies in Higher Education 2002 27 2 169 185

MallickS. “Democratizing Scientific Knowledge through Building Scientific Institutions in Nineteenth Century India: The Sociology of Science Perspective.” Current Science 2006 90 8 1138 1145

MallickS. “The Intellectual Property Rights Regime and Changing Structure of Scientific Research in India: Lessons from the Developing World.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 2009 8 4 628 654

MallickS. “Knowledge Production in Biotechnology in India.” ieee Technology and Society 2011 30 2 46 54

MallickS. “The Orbit of Commodified Technoscience: Innovations in Agricultural Technology in India.” International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 2014 8 4 346 362

MallickS. “Inter-institutional Collaborative Networking in the Intellectual Property Rights Regime: Research in Plant Molecular Biology in India.” International Journal of Biotechnology 2015 14 forthcoming

MallickS.HaribabuE. “The Intellectual Property Rights Regime and Emerging Institutional Framework of Scientific Research: Responses from Plant Molecular Biologists in India.” Asian Journal of Social Science 2010 38 1 79 106

MallickS.HaribabuE.ReddyB. B. “Industrialization of Seed Production: Implications for Agriculture in India.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 2011 10 3-4 441 457

MarxK.EngelsF. The German Ideology 1970 New York International Publishers

MeenaM. S.SinghK. M. “Decision Process: Innovations, Constraints and Strategies for Adoption of Conservation Agriculture.” 2012 Accessed March 26 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/srn.2088710

MelinG. “Pragmatism and Self-Organization Research Collaboration on the Individual Level.” Research Policy 2000 29 1 31 40

MertonR. K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations 1973 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press

MyhrA.TraavikT. “Genetically Modified (gm) Crops: Precautionary Science and Conflicts of Interests.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2003 16 3 227 247

PolanyiM. The Tacit Dimension 1983 First published Doubleday & Co 1966. Reprinted Peter Smith Gloucester Mass

SalmonJean-Jacques Science and Politics 1973 Cambridge, MA MIT Press

ScoonesIan Science Agriculture and the Politics of Policy: The Case of Biotechnology in India 2005 New Delhi Orient Longman Private Limited

SinghK. M.SinghR. K. P. K. M.KumarA. “Adoption of Modern Agriculture Technology in Bihar: A Farm Level Study.” Environment and Ecology 2014 32 4 1342 1346

SonnenwaldD. H. “Scientific Collaboration.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 2007 41 1 643 681

WalshJ. P.MaloneyN. G. KieslerS. “Computer Network Use, Collaboration Structures, and Productivity” Distributed Work 2002 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 433 451

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 5
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0