While capitalism as a system follows a logic that drives it toward environmental degradation, not every corporation blindly follows. Not all capital is opposed to action on climate change as corporations have their own internal logic and agency. This divides different parts of capital. For some corporations their logic promotes long-termism and environmental sustainability as this maximizes their profit (e.g. insurance companies). So ownership and the old divisions between industrial and finance capital are less relevant as corporations become increasingly financialized. The principal cleavage on climate issues is between companies whose profits are enhanced or threatened by carbon emissions.
FortinRichMichelsonStuartFund Indexing Vs. Active Management: The Results Are. . . .Journal of Financial Planning1999February1227481http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/1570700/fund-indexing-vs-active-management-results-are
LakeRobFinancial Reform Institutional Investors and Sustainable Development: A review of current policy initiatives and proposals for further progress2015GenevaUnited Nations Environment Programme with California Public Employees’ Retirement System
PeetzDavidMurrayGeorginaYoungSuzanneGatesStephen“Financialization of corporate ownership and implications for the potential for climate action.”Institutional Investors’ Power to Change Corporate Behavior: International Perspectives Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility Governance and Sustainability2013Bingley, UKEmerald99125
PeetzDavidMurrayGeorginaSpragueJeb“Conflicts within Transnational Finance Capital and the Motivations of Climate-Interested Investors.”Globalization and Transnational Capitalism in Asia and Oceania2015New YorkRoutledge163179
RobinsonWilliam I.Helsinki: UNU-WIDER Working Paper SeriesGlobal Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites2010https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/global-capitalism-theory-and-emergence-transnational-elites