Self-Contained Localization Strategy: Case Studies of Japanese Firms

in Perspectives on Global Development and Technology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Huge numbers of middle-income groups are distributed in China and Association of South East Asian Nations (asean). In this context, global firms recognize the need for localization strategy. The practical upcoming challenge of global companies is to determine the best way to accomplish localization. In this paper, we present the development of a self-contained localization system based on organizational capabilities, and suggest the self-contained localization strategy through case studies of Japanese firms. The foreign subsidiaries with self-contained units include their own R&D, operations, marketing, service, and human resource functions. Therefore, the self-contained localization strategy allows the foreign subsidiary a large degree of autonomy in responding appropriately to local competitive conditions with locally responsive strategies. When we analyze the relationships between Japanese headquarters and local business subsidiaries, we find the larger a degree of autonomy of self-contained subsidiaries, the higher their global market share.

Self-Contained Localization Strategy: Case Studies of Japanese Firms

in Perspectives on Global Development and Technology



AboTetsuoHiroshi ItagakiK. KamiyamaT. Kawamura and H. Kobun. 1991. “Japanese Production System Applied in US: Application and Adaptation in the Local Factory.” Touyou Economic Newspaper (in Japanese). Tokyo.

AmanoTomohumi. 2005. International Specialization in East Asia and Japanese Firms. Tokyo: Yuhikaku(in Japanese).

BartlettChristopher A. and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

DanneelsErwin. 2002. “The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences.” Strategic Management Journal23: 1095-1121.

DoughertyDeborah and Trudy Heller. 1994. “The illegitimacy of successful product innovations in established firms.” Organization Science5: 200-218.

DoughertyDeborah. 1995. “Managing your core incompetencies for corporate venturing.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice19(3): 13-135.

EisenhardtKathleen M. 2000. “Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism (introduction to special topic forum).” Academy of Management Review25(4): 703-705.

EvansPaul. 1999. “HRM on the edge: A duality perspective,” Organization6(2): 325-338.

FujimotoTakahiro. 2003. Noryoku kochiku kyoso (Capability-building competition) Chukousinsyo (in Japanese). English translation: Competing to be really good (translated by MillerBrian). Tokyo: International House of Japan.

GraetzFiona and Aaron C.T. Smith. 2008. “The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing.” International Journal of Management Reviews10(3): 265-280.

HamelGary and PrahaladC.K. 1994. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.

HelfatConstance E. and Ruth S. Raubitschek. 2000. “Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products.” Strategic Management Journal Special Issue21(10/11): 961-979.

HendersonRebecca and Iain Cockburn. 1994. “Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research.” Strategic Management Journal15: 63-84.

HendersonRebecca and Kim B. Clark. 1990. “Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly35: 9-30.

HendersonRebecca. 1991. “Of Life Cycle Real and Imaginary: The Unexpectedly Long Old Age of Optical Lithography.” Research Policy24: 631-643.

HendersonRebecca. 1993. “Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry.” The Rand Journal of Economics24(2): 248-270.

HillmanAmy J. and William P. Wan. 2005. “The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality.” Journal of International Business Studies36(3): 322-340.

HirotaShinichiKatsuyuki KuboHideaki MiyajimaPaul Hong and YoungWon Park. 2010. “Corporate mission, corporate policies and business outcomes: Evidence from Japan.” Management Decision48(7): 1134-1153.

HongPaul and YoungWon Park. 2014. Building Network Capabilities in Turbulent Competitive Environments: Business Success Stories from the BRICs. New York: Taylor & Francis.

HongPaulMark A. VonderembseWilliam J. Doll and Abraham Nahm. 2005. “Role Changes of Design Engineers in Integrated Product Development.” Journal of Operations Management24(1): 63-79.

HongPaulWilliam J. DollAbraham Nahm and Xiao Li. 2004. “Knowledge Sharing in Integrated Product Development,” European Journal of Innovation Management7(2): 102-112.

HongPaulWilliam J. DollElena Revilla and Abraham Nahm. 2011. “Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development: An Empirical Study.” International Journal of Production Economics132(2): 186-196.

KogutBruce. 1985. “Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility.” Sloan Management Review27(1): 27-38.

Leonard-BartonDororthy. 1992. “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development.” Strategic Management Journal13(1): 111-125.

LevinthalDaniel A and James G. March. 1993. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal14: 95-112.

meti. 2011. White paper on international economy and trade 2011. Policy Planning and Research Office, Trade Policy Bureau, METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry)August 2Tokyo.

MarchJames G. 1991“Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science2(1): 71-87.

MoroneG. Joseph. 1993. Wining in High Tech MarketsHarvard Business School PressBoston, USA.

OkiK. 2009. “Building capabilities of overseas subsidiaries in the context of international functional specialization: A case study of Japanese HDD makers.” Journal of International Business1(1): 19-34 (in Japanese).

ParkYoungWon and Paul Hong. 2012. Building Network Capabilities in Turbulent Competitive Environments: Practices of Global Firms from Korea and Japan. New York: Taylor & Francis.

ParkYoungWon and Paul Hong. 2015. “The role of IT for global firms in emerging markets.” International Journal of Business Information Systems Special Issue18(4): 490-505.

ParkYoungWon and ShintakuJunjiro. 2016. “The replication process of a global localisation strategy: a case study of Korean firms.” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research10(1): 8-25.

ParkYoungWon and Tomohumi Amano. 2011. “Localization strategy of the Korean companies in India: The comparison with the Japanese companies.” Hitotsubashi Business Review59(3): 6-21. (In Japanese.)

ParkYoungWonJeWheon Oh and Takahiro Fujimoto. 2012. “Global expansion and supply chain integration: Case study of Korean firms,” International Journal of Procurement Management5(4): 470-485.

ParkYoungWonTakahiro Fujimoto and Paul Hong. 2012. “Product architecture, organizational capabilities and IT integration for competitive advantage.” International Journal of Information Management32: 479-488.

ParkYoungWon. 2009. “[A 33th Story of Monozukuri’s Journey in Asia] Korean firms’ localization strategy in Indian market: From local accommodation marketing to premium market pioneering.” Akamon Management Review8(4) April: 181-211 (in Japanese).

ParkYoungWon. 2012. “Product architecture and Emerging Market Strategy: Competitive Studies of Japanese and Korean Firms.” WIAS Research Bulletin (4):17-30 (in Japanese).

PrahaladC.K. and Gary Hamel. 1990. “The core competence of the corporation.” Harvard Business Review68(3): 79-91.

SchulzePatrick. 2009. Balancing Exploitation and Exploration: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Effects of Innovation Strategies. Gabler Verlag.

SidhuJatinder S.Harry R. Commandeur and Henk W. Volberda. 2007. “The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation.” Organization Science18(1): 20-38.

SidhuJatinder S.Henk W. Volberda and Harry R. Commandeur. 2004. “Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Management Studies41(6): 913-932.



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 39 39 12
Full Text Views 79 79 52
PDF Downloads 11 11 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0