Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Overpopulation Discourse: Patriarchy, Racism, and the Specter of Ecofascism
In: Perspectives on Global Development and TechnologyAbstract
As our current climate crises increase in severity, discussions on solutions have found themselves at the forefront of mainstream media, and talked about by political actors and economic elites. While many of these solutions may seem ethical or even the answer to our ecological problem, we must take a critical look at the root causes in order to understand what actions are necessary. Without this, our discussions fall short, and tend to negatively affect marginalized communities. Family-planning programs aimed at the suppression of certain populations is one example used when discussing how to combat overpopulation in order to alleviate climate change. This superficial, Western, capitalist-driven idea and discussion, laced with sexist and racist undertones, is the discourse we will be analyzing. By employing a critical decolonial and ecofeminist lens, we will critique this discourse, and argue that it’s an all-too-common tool of deflection and scapegoating that white environmentalism employs in order to ignore historic power relations. Further, we will illuminate historical roots and trends around the family-planning movement, such as anti-immigrant sentiment, nationalism, and ecofascism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ahmed, Nafeez M. 2010. A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization. London: Pluto.
-
Ahmed, Nafeez M. 2011. “The International Relations of Crisis and the Crisis of International Relations: From Securitisation of Scarcity to the Militarization of Society.” Global Change, Peace, and Security 23:335-355.
-
Bauhardt, Christine. 2013. “Rethinking Gender and Nature from a Material(ist) Perspective: Feminist Economics, Queer Ecologies and Resource Politics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 20(4):361-375.
-
Beltrán, Elizabeth Peredo. 2017. “Ecofeminism.” pp. 101-129 in Systemic Alternatives. Bangkok, Thailand: Focus on the Global South.
-
Bettini, Giovanni. 2013. “Climate Barbarians at the Gate? A Critique of Apocalyptic Narratives on ‘Climate Refugees’” Geoforum 45:63-72.
-
Betts, Alexander. 2009. Forced Migration and Global Politics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
-
Biehl, Janet and Peter Staudenmaier. 1996. “Ecofascism: Lessons from the German Experience.” Retrieved on July 11th, 2018. (https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/janet-biehl-and-peter-staudenmaier-ecofascism-lessons-from-the-german-experience).
-
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 2018. “Family Planning.” Retrieved on March 29, 2018. (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Development/Family-Planning).
-
Brookfield, Stephen. 2004. The Power of Critical Theory. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
-
Burris, Val. 1982. “The Dialectic of Women’s Oppression: Notes on the Relation Between Capitalism and Patriarchy.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 27:51-74.
-
Connell, Raewyn. 2014. “The Sociology of Gender in Southern Perspective.” Current Sociology 62(4):550-567.
-
Dastile, Nontyatyambo Pearl and Sabelo J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni. 2014. “Power, Knowledge, and Being: Decolonial Combative Discourse as a Survival Kit for Pan-Africanists in the 21st Century.” Alternation 20:105-134.
-
Federici, Silvia, 2004. Caliban and the Witch. New York: Autonomedia.
-
Figueroa-Helland, Leonardo E. and Tim Lindgren. 2016. “What Goes Around Comes Around: From the Coloniality of Power to the Crisis of Civilization.” Journal of World-Systems Research 22(2):430-462.
-
Foster, John, Brett Clark, and Richard York. 2010. The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth. New York: Monthly Review.
-
Gaard, Greta. 2011. “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-Placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism.” Feminist Formations 23(2):26-53.
-
Gaard, Greta. 2015. “Ecofeminism and Climate Change.” Women’s Studies International Forum 49:1-42.
-
George, Susan. 2010. “Converging Crises: Reality, Fear and Hope.” Globalizations 7:17-22.
-
Gribble, James, Suneeta Sharma, and Elaine Menotti. “Family Planning Policies and Their Impacts on the Poor: Peru’s Experience.” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 33(4):176.
-
Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2011. “Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1:1-14.
-
Grosfoguel, Ramón, Laura Oso, and Anastasia Christou. 2015. “‘Racism’, Intersectionality and Migration Studies: Framing Some Theoretical Reflections.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 22(6):1-18.
-
Harrington, Cameron. 2016. “The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44(3):478-498.
-
Hartley, Daniel. 2016. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, and the Problem of Culture.” pp. 154-165 in Anthropocene or Capitalocene: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Edited by Jason W. Moore. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
-
Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and The End of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Horne, Denise. 2013. “Locating Security in the Womb.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 15(2):195-212.
-
Houtart, François. 2010. “The Multiple Crises and Beyond.” Globalizations 7:9-15.
-
Kaijser, Anna and Annica Kronsell. 2014. “Climate Change Through the Lens of Intersectionality.” Environmental Politics 23(3):417-433.
-
Kuumba, Monica Bahati. 1993. “Perpetuating Neo-Colonialism Through Population Control: South Africa and the United States.” Africa Today 79(3):79-85.
-
Lawson, Stephanie. 2015. Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. Massachusetts: Polity Press.
-
Lugones, María. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25(4):742-759.
-
Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1798. “An Essay on the Principle of Population.” Retrieved on March 29, 2018. (http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf).
-
Mcbay, Aric, Lierre Keith, and Derrick Jensen. 2011. Deep Green Resistance: Strategy to Save the Planet. NY: Seven Stories Press.
-
Mellor, Mary. 1997. Feminism and Ecology. NY: New York University Press.
-
Moore, Jason W. 2016. “The Rise of Cheap Nature.” pp. 78-115 in Anthropocene or Capitalocene: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Edited by Jason W. Moore. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
-
Moore, Jason W. (Ed). 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
-
Nkrumah, Kwame. 1965. Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. London, UK: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
-
Quíjano, Anibal. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Nepantla: Views From the South 1(3):533-580.
-
Ridgeway, Sharon J. and Peter J. Jaques. 2014. “Capitalism’s Endless Pursuit of Profit Destroys the World’s Food Supply.” pp. 65-84 in The Power of the Talking Stick: Indigenous Politics and the World Ecological Crisis. Edited by Sharon J. Ridgeway. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
-
Roberts, David. 2018. “I’m An Environmental Journalist, but I Never Write About Overpopulation. Here’s Why.” Retrieved on July 24, 2018. (https://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/2018/05/19/im-an-environmental-journalist-but-i-never-write-about-overpopulation-heres-why/).
-
Robinson, Cedric. 2000. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Robinson, William I. 2014. “Global Capitalism: Crisis of Humanity and the Specter of 21st Century Fascism.” pp. 14-16 in The World Financial Review.
-
Salleh, Ariel. 2016. “The Anthropocene: Thinking in ‘Deep Geological Time’ or Deep Libidinal Time?” International Critical Thought 6(3):422-433.
-
Sheppard, Eric, Philip W. Porter, David R. Faust, and Richa Nagar. 2009. A World of Difference: Encountering and Contesting Development. New York: The Guilford Press.
-
Simmons, Skyler. n.d. “We are the .00018 Percent! Does Earth First! Carry the Capacity for a Justice Based Approach to Overpopulation?” Retrieved on July 24, 2018. (https://earthfirstjournal.org/newswire/articles/we-are-the-00018-percent-does-earth-first-carry-the-capacity-for-a-justice-based-approach-to-overpopulation/).
-
Smith, Andrea and Winona LaDuke. 2015. Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Stavig, Lucia. 2017. “What Universal Rights Subject?: Women’s Rights, Forced Sterilization, and Indigenous Women in Peru.” Unpublished Thesis.
-
US Agency for International Development (USAID). 2016a. “USAID’s Family Planning Partnerships.” Retrieved on March 29, 2018. (https://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do/global-health/family-planning/partnerships).
-
US Agency for International Development (USAID). 2016b. “Issue Brief: USAID’s Partnership with Peru Advances Family Planning.” Retrieve on March 29, 2018. (https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1864/peru-508.pdf).
-
Wichterich, Christa. 2012. “The Future We Want: A Feminist Perspective.” In Publication Series on Ecology. Edited by Heinrich Böll Foundation.
-
Wise, Raúl Delgado. 2015. “Migration and Labour under Neoliberal Globalization.” In Migration, Precarity, and Global Governance: Challenges and Opportunities for Labour. Edited by Carl-Ulrik Schierup, Ronaldo Munck, Branda Likic-Brboric, and Anders Neergaard. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
World Economic Forum. “Davos 2014: Changing the Climate for Growth and Development.” Film. YouTube.com Video. Posted January 24, 2014. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aen6ubFLSmo).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 11602 | 3185 | 357 |
| Full Text Views | 1455 | 442 | 48 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 2373 | 936 | 97 |
Overpopulation Discourse: Patriarchy, Racism, and the Specter of Ecofascism
In: Perspectives on Global Development and TechnologyAbstract
As our current climate crises increase in severity, discussions on solutions have found themselves at the forefront of mainstream media, and talked about by political actors and economic elites. While many of these solutions may seem ethical or even the answer to our ecological problem, we must take a critical look at the root causes in order to understand what actions are necessary. Without this, our discussions fall short, and tend to negatively affect marginalized communities. Family-planning programs aimed at the suppression of certain populations is one example used when discussing how to combat overpopulation in order to alleviate climate change. This superficial, Western, capitalist-driven idea and discussion, laced with sexist and racist undertones, is the discourse we will be analyzing. By employing a critical decolonial and ecofeminist lens, we will critique this discourse, and argue that it’s an all-too-common tool of deflection and scapegoating that white environmentalism employs in order to ignore historic power relations. Further, we will illuminate historical roots and trends around the family-planning movement, such as anti-immigrant sentiment, nationalism, and ecofascism.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 11602 | 3185 | 357 |
| Full Text Views | 1455 | 442 | 48 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 2373 | 936 | 97 |