Qurʾānic Studies and Historical-Critical Philology
The Qurʾān’s Staging, Penetrating and Eclipsing of Biblical Tradition
In: Philological EncountersSearch for other papers by Angelika Neuwirth in
Current site
Google Scholar
Qurʾānic scholarship in the west today tends to privilege historical queries, focusing on fragmented texts, their alleged subtexts, and the codex’s earliest venues of transmission. It usually abstains from attempts at making sense of the text as a literary artifact, let alone as an epistemic intervention into the reception of the Bible. Such concerns are left to philology which—if we follow Sheldon Pollock—is a tripartite venture: a query for “textual meaning,” an investigation into the text’s traditional understanding, i.e. its “contextual meaning,” and finally a re-thinking of one’s own scholarly preconceptions and responsibilities, the “philologist’s meaning.” Few topics are better suited to demonstrate the urgency of complementing historical with philological research than the Qurʾān’s controversial relation to the Bible. A fresh approach—updating the time-honored but somewhat fusty historical critical method—is required: a diachronic, yet contextual, and moreover holistic, reading of the Qurʾān. This paper will discuss texts that—featuring Muhammad and Moses respectively—reveal two major shifts in the relationship between the Qurʾān and Biblical tradition.
Historical research should not be left alone: philology’s two assets, the contextual reading and moreover the researcher’s self-reflection, need to be admitted to the stage of Qurʾānic Studies. Christian interpretation of the Bible that, for historical and political reasons, has until now not taken the Qurʾān into account, could benefit substantially from the Qurʾān’s Biblical criticism, let alone its intrinsic challenge to rethink prevailing exclusivist positions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arberry Arthur The Koran Interpreted 1964 London Oxford University Press
-
Assmann Jan Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination 2011 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
-
Assmann Jan Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen 1992 Munich C.H. Beck
-
Bobzin Hartmut Der Koran: Eine Einführung 1999 Munich C.H. Beck
-
Bouman Jan Der Koran und die Juden: Die Geschichte einer Tragödie 1990 Darmstadt Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
-
Bultmann Rudolf Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition 1921 Göttingen Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
-
Cook Michael The Koran: A Very Short Introduction 2000 Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Corpus Coranicum Project Documentation and Commentary on the Text of the Qurʾān Accessed January 23, 2015 http://www.bbaw.de/en/research/Cora
-
Cuypers Michel The Banquet: A Reading of the Fifth Sura of the Qurʾān 2009 Miami Convivium Press
-
Déroche Francois Le Coran 2005 Paris Presses Universitaires de France
-
Ernst Carl W. How to read the Qurʾān: A new guide, with select translations 2012 Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press
-
Fishbane Michael Haftarot: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New jps Translation 2002 Philadelphia Jewish Publication Society
-
Friedman Yohanan Tolerance and Coercion in Islam: Interfaith Relations in the Muslim Tradition 2003 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
-
Frye Northrop The Great Code. The Bible and Literature 1982 San Diego Harcourt
-
Fück Johann “Die Originalität des arabischen Propheten.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90 1936 509 525
-
Geiger Abraham Was hat Mohammed aus dem Judenthume aufgenommen? 2005 Berlin Parerga Bonn, 1833; Reprint
-
Griffith Sidney The Bible in Arabic 2013 Princeton Princeton University Press
-
Hallaq Wael Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān Vol 3 2004 Leiden E. J. Brill s.v. “Law and the Qurʾān.”
-
Hartwig Dirk , Homolka Walter , Marx Michael & Neuwirth Angelika ‘Im vollen Licht der Geschichte’: Die Wissenschaft des Judentums und die Anfänge der Koranforschung 2008 Würzburg Ergon
-
Heller Bernhard “Ginzberg’s Legends of the Jews.” Jewish Quarterly Review 24 1933 51 66 165 190 281 307 393 418 25 (1934):29-52
-
Heschel Susannah The Aryan Jesus: Christian Theologians and the Bible in Nazi Germany 2008 Princeton Princeton University Press
-
Hieros Synekdemos kai ta hagia pathe Greek Orthodox Prayer Book
-
Kugel James How to read the Bible: A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now 1980 New York Free Press reprint 2008
-
Lazarus-Yafeh Hava Intertwined Worlds: Medieval Islam and Bible Criticism 1992 Princeton Princeton University Press
-
Leicht Reimund Hartwig Dirk, Homolka Walter, Marx Michael & Neuwirth Angelika “Das Schriftlichkeitsgebot bei Darlehensverträgen im Koran (Sure 2:282): Perspektiven eines Vergleichs mit dem rabbinischen Recht.” ‘Im vollen Licht der Geschichte’: Die Wissenschaft des Judentums und die Anfänge der kritischen Koranforschung 2008 Würzburg Ergon 202 221
-
Manuel Frank E. The Broken Staff: Judaism through Christian Eyes 1992 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
-
Neuwirth Angelika “Einige Bemerkungen zum besonderen sprachlichen und literarischen Charakter des Koran.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft Suppl. 3.1 1977 736 739
-
Neuwirth Angelika Arnzen Rüdiger & Thielmann Jörn “Meccan Texts—Medinan Additions? Politics and the Re-reading of Liturgical Communications.” Words, Texts, and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea: Studies on sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science 2004 Leuven Peeters 71 93
-
Neuwirth Angelika Neuwirth Angelika, Sinai Nicolai & Marx Michael “Qurʾānic Readings of the Psalms.” The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʾānic Milieu 2010 Leiden; Boston E. J. Brill 733 778
-
Neuwirth Angelika al-Shaar Nuha “The Discovery of Writing in the Qurʾān: Tracing an Epistemic Revolution in Late Antiquity.” Qurʾān and Adab Oxford (forthcoming)
-
Neuwirth Angelika Neuwirth Angelika, Sinai Nicolai & Marx Michael “The House of Abraham and the House of Amram: Genealogy, Patriarchal Authority, and Exegetical Professionalism.” The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʾānic Milieu 2010 Leiden;Boston E. J. Brill 499 532
-
Neuwirth Angelika Der Koran als Text der Spätantike 2010 Berlin Verlag der Weltreligionen
-
Neuwirth Angelika Der Koran i: Frühmekkanische Suren 2011 Berlin Verlag der Weltreligionen
-
Neuwirth Angelika Scripture, Poetry and the Making of a Community: A Literary Reading of the Qurʾān In print
-
Olender Maurice Les Langues du Paradis: Aryans et Sémites, un couple providentiel 1989 Paris Seuil
-
Olender Maurice Goldhammer Arthur The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion, and Philology in the Nineteenth Century 1992 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
-
Pollock Sheldon “Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.” Critical Inquiry 35 4 (2009) 931 961
-
Robinson Neal “Sūrat Āl ʿImrān and those with the Greatest Claim to Abraham.” Journal of Qurʾānic Studies 6 2 (2004) 1 21
-
Rubin Uri Between Bible and Qurʾān: The Children of Israel and the Islamic Self-image 1999 Princeton The Darwin Press
-
Rubin Uri Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān Vol 3 2004 Leiden E. J. Brill s.v. “Jews and Judaism.”
-
Sacks Jonathan The Koren (Sacks) Siddur: Hebrew and English Edition 2009 Jerusalem Koren Publishers Jerusalem
-
Schippers Arie Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān Vol 4 2004 Leiden E. J. Brill s.v. “Psalms.”
-
Seppälä Serafim “Reminiscences of Icons in the Qurʾān.” The Qurʾān and Christian-Muslim Relations 22 2011 3 21
-
Sinai Nicolai Neuwirth Angelika, Sinai Nicolai & Marx Michael “The Qurʾān as Process.” The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʾānic Milieu 2010 Leiden;Boston E. J. Brill 407 440
-
Sinai Nicolai Die heilige Schrift des Islams: Die wichtigsten Fakten zum Koran 2012 Freiburg; Basel; Wien Herder
-
Speyer Heinrich Die biblischen Erzählungen im Qoran 1931 Gräfenhainichen Schulze Reprint Hildesheim: Olms, 1961, 1988
-
Steinsaltz Adin A Guide to Jewish Prayer 2000 New York Schocken
-
Wansbrough John E. Qur’anic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation 1977 Oxford Oxford University Press
-
Wensinck Arent Jan Mohammed en de Joden te Medina 1908 Leiden E. J. Brill
-
Witztum Joseph The Syriac Milieu of the Qurʾān: The Recasting of Biblical Narratives 2011 Unpublished PhD dissertation, Princeton University
-
Zahniser A.H. Mathias “The Word of God and the Apostleship of ʿĪsā: A Narrative Analysis of Āl ʿImrān (3): 33-62.” Journal of Semitic Studies 36 1991 77 112
-
Zellentin Holger The Qurʾān’s Legal Culture: The Didascalia Apostolorum as a Point of Departure 2013 Munich Mohr Siebeck
-
Zobel Moritz Das Jahr des Juden in Brauch und Liturgie 1936 Berlin Schocken
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 896 | 417 | 158 |
| Full Text Views | 118 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 215 | 32 | 0 |
Qurʾānic Studies and Historical-Critical Philology
The Qurʾān’s Staging, Penetrating and Eclipsing of Biblical Tradition
In: Philological EncountersSearch for other papers by Angelika Neuwirth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Qurʾānic scholarship in the west today tends to privilege historical queries, focusing on fragmented texts, their alleged subtexts, and the codex’s earliest venues of transmission. It usually abstains from attempts at making sense of the text as a literary artifact, let alone as an epistemic intervention into the reception of the Bible. Such concerns are left to philology which—if we follow Sheldon Pollock—is a tripartite venture: a query for “textual meaning,” an investigation into the text’s traditional understanding, i.e. its “contextual meaning,” and finally a re-thinking of one’s own scholarly preconceptions and responsibilities, the “philologist’s meaning.” Few topics are better suited to demonstrate the urgency of complementing historical with philological research than the Qurʾān’s controversial relation to the Bible. A fresh approach—updating the time-honored but somewhat fusty historical critical method—is required: a diachronic, yet contextual, and moreover holistic, reading of the Qurʾān. This paper will discuss texts that—featuring Muhammad and Moses respectively—reveal two major shifts in the relationship between the Qurʾān and Biblical tradition.
Historical research should not be left alone: philology’s two assets, the contextual reading and moreover the researcher’s self-reflection, need to be admitted to the stage of Qurʾānic Studies. Christian interpretation of the Bible that, for historical and political reasons, has until now not taken the Qurʾān into account, could benefit substantially from the Qurʾān’s Biblical criticism, let alone its intrinsic challenge to rethink prevailing exclusivist positions.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 896 | 417 | 158 |
| Full Text Views | 118 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 215 | 32 | 0 |