This essay reviews a major new study of European Renaissance Arabist-humanist philology as it was actually practiced, humanist neoclassicizing anti-Arabism notwithstanding. While definitive and philologically magisterial, that study nevertheless falls prey structurally and conceptually to the very eurocentrism whose ideological-textual genesis it chronicles. Situating it within the comparative global early modern philologies framework that has now been proposed in the volume World Philology and the present journal is a necessary remedy—but only a partial one; for that framework too still obscures the multiplicity of specifically genetically Western early modernities, thus hobbling comparative history of philology. I therefore propose a new framework appropriate to the study of Greco-Arabo-Persian and Greco-Arabo-Latin as the two parallel and equally powerful philosophical-philological trajectories that together defined early modern Western—i.e., Hellenic-Abrahamic, Islamo-Judeo-Christian, west of South India—intellectual history: taḥqīq vs. taqlīd, progressivism vs. declinism.
But a broadened and more balanced analytical framework alone cannot save philology, much less Western civilization, from the throes of its current existential crisis: for we philologists of the Euro-American academy are fevered too by the cosmological ill that is reflexive scientistic materialism. As antidote, I prescribe a progressivist, postmodern return to early modern Western deconstructive-reconstructive cosmic philology as prerequisite for the discipline’s survival, and perhaps even triumph, in the teeth of totalitarian colonialist-capitalist modernity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alam, Muzaffar. “Mughal Philology and Rūmī’s Mathnavī.” In World Philology, edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, Ku-ming Kevin Chang, 178-200. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 2015.
al-ʿĀmilī, Bahāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad. Kulliyyāt-i Ashʿār u Āsār-i Fārsī-yi Shaykh Bahāʾī. Edited by ʿAlī Kātibī, introduction by Saʿīd Nafīsī. Tehran: Chakāma, 1383 Sh./2004.
Aydin, Cemil. The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Bacon, Francis. New Atlantis. A Worke unfinished. London, 1627.
Bauer, Thomas. “Mamluk Literature: Misunderstandings and New Approaches.” Mamlūk Studies Review 9/2 (2005): 105-132.
Beecroft, Alexander. An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day. London: Verso, 2015.
Berns, Andrew D. The Bible and Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Italy: Jewish and Christian Physicians in Search of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Bono, James J. “Making Knowledge: History, Literature, and the Poetics of Science.” Isis 101/3 (2010): 555-559.
Bono, James J. The Word of God and the Languages of Man: Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1995.
Brennan, Timothy. Borrowed Light: Vico, Hegel, and the Colonies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.
Bulliet, Richard. The Case for Islamo-Christian Civilization. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Busch, Allison. “The Anxiety of Innovation: The Practice of Literary Science in the Hindi/Riti Tradition.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 24/2 (2004): 45-59.
Chittick, William C. Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul: The Pertinence of Islamic Cosmology in the Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld, 2007.
Dallal, Ahmad. Islam without Europe: Traditions of Reform in Eighteenth-Century Islamic Thought. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, forthcoming 2018.
Dayeh, Islam. “The Potential of World Philology.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 396-418.
Dudney, Arthur. “Metaphorical Language as a Battleground for Tradition and Newness in Late Mughal Persian.” International Journal of Persian Literature 2 (2017): 138-160.
Dudney, Arthur. “A Desire for Meaning: Ḳhān-i Ārzū’s Philology and the Place of India in the Eighteenth-Century Persianate World.” PhD diss., Columbia University, 2013.
Ebstein, Michael. Mysticism and Philosophy in al-Andalus: Ibn Masarra, Ibn al-ʿArabī and the Ismāʿīlī Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Elman, Benjamin A. “Early Modern or Late Imperial? The Crisis of Classical Philology in Eighteenth-Century China.” In World Philology, edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, Ku-ming Kevin Chang, 225-244. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Elmore, Gerald T. Islamic Sainthood in the Fullness of Time: Ibn al-ʿArabī’s Book of the Fabulous Gryphon. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. Islamic Intellectual History in the Seventeenth Century: Scholarly Currents in the Ottoman Empire and the Maghreb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. “The Rise of ‘Deep Reading’ in Early Modern Ottoman Scholarly Culture.” In World Philology, edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, Kuming Kevin Chang, 201-224. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Endress, Gerhard. “Philosophische Ein-Band-Bibliotheken aus Isfahan.” Oriens 36 (2001): 10-58.
Erünsal, İsmail E. Ottoman Libraries: A Survey of the History, Development, and Organization of the Ottoman Foundation Libraries. Cambridge [MASS]: The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Literatures, Harvard University, 2008.
Fleischer, Cornell H. “Ancient Wisdom and New Sciences: Prophecies at the Ottoman Court in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens, edited by Massumeh Farhad and Serpil Bağcı, 232-243. London: Thames & Hudson, 2009.
Fowden, Garth. Before and after Muḥammad: The First Millennium Refocused. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
Gandhi, Supriya. “Mughal Self-Fashioning, Indic Self-Realization: Dārā Shikoh and Persian Textual Cultures in Early Modern South Asia.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2011.
Ganeri, Jonardon. The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450-1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Gardiner, Noah. “The Occultist Encyclopedism of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Bisṭāmī.” Mamlūk Studies Review 20 (2017): 3-38.
Gardiner, Noah. “Esotericism in a Manuscript Culture: Aḥmad al-Būnī and His Readers through the Mamlūk Period.” PhD diss., University of Michigan, 2014.
Gutas, Dimitri. “The Intentions of the Philosophers, Avicenna and after: The History of Science Background.” Forthcoming.
Gutas, Dimitri. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th Centuries). New York: Routledge, 1998.
Håkansson, Håkan. Seeing the Word: John Dee and Renaissance Occultism. Lund: Lund University Press, 2001.
Halbertal, Moshe. Concealment and Revelation: Esotericism in Jewish Thought and Its Philosophical Implications. Translated by Jackie Feldman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Hanna, Nelly. In Praise of Books: A Cultural History of Cairo’s Middle Class, Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century. Syracuse [NY]: Syracuse University Press, 2003.
Hirschler, Konrad. Medieval Damascus: Plurality and Diversity in an Arabic Library: The Ashrafīya Library Catalogue. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
Hirschler, Konrad. The Written Word in the Medieval Arabic Lands: A Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.
Hodgson, Marshall G. S. The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization. 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
Ibn ʿArabī. Risālat al-Intiṣār. In Rasāʾil Ibn ʿArabī, edited by Muḥammad Shihāb al-Dīn al-ʿArabī, 336-348. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1997.
Joost-Gaugier, Christiane L. Pythagoras and Renaissance Europe: Finding Heaven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Josephson-Storm, Jason Ā. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Kaldellis, Anthony, and Niketas Siniossoglou, eds. The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Kia, Mana. Sensibilities of Belonging: Transregional Persianate Community before Nationalism. Forthcoming.
Killeen, Kevin and Peter J. Forshaw, eds. The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Kinra, Rajeev. “Cultures of Comparative Philology in the Early Modern Indo-Persian World.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 225-287.
Kraemer, Joel L. Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam: The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. 2nd revised edition. Leiden: Brill, 1992.
Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Lelić, Emin. “Physiognomy (ʿilm-i firāsat) and Ottoman Statecraft: Discerning Morality and Justice.” In Islamicate Occultism: New Perspectives, edited by Matthew Melvin-Koushki and Noah Gardiner. Special double issue of Arabica 64/3-4 (2017): 609-646.
Masuzawa, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
McGann, Jerome. “Philology in a New Key.” Critical Inquiry 39/2 (2013): 327-346.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. The Occult Science of Empire in Aqquyunlu-Safavid Iran: Two Shirazi Lettrists. With an Edition and Translation of Jalāl al-Dīn Davānī’s A Spiritual Boon and Maḥmūd Dihdār’s Choicest Talismans. Forthcoming.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “World as (Arabic) Text: Mīr Dāmād and the Neopythagoreanization of Philosophy in Safavid Iran.” Forthcoming.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “The Occult Sciences in Safavid Iran and Safavid Occultists Abroad.” In The Safavid World, edited by Rudi Matthee. New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2019.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire: New Forms of Religiopolitical Legitimacy. In The Wiley-Blackwell History of Islam, edited by Armando Salvatore, Roberto Tottoli, Babak Rahimi, 353-375. Malden [MASS]: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Powers of One: The Mathematicalization of the Occult Sciences in the High Persianate Tradition.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 5/1 (2017): 127-199.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “(De)colonizing Early Modern Occult Philosophy.” Review essay on Liana Saif, The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft 12/1 (2017): 98-112.
Melvin-Koushki, Matthew. “Of Islamic Grammatology: Ibn Turka’s Lettrist Metaphysics of Light.” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā 24 (2016): 42-113.
Mīr Dāmād. Jaẕavāt u Mavāqīt. Edited by ʿAlī Awjabī, with glosses by Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī. Tehran: Mīrās̱-i Maktūb, 1380 Sh./2001.
Mitchell, Colin P. The Practice of Politics in Safavid Iran: Power, Religion and Rhetoric. London: I.B. Tauris, 2009.
Moore, Alan. Promethea. No. 32, America’s Best Comics, April 2005.
Morrison, Robert. “A Scholarly Intermediary between the Ottoman Empire and Renaissance Europe.” Isis 105/1 (2014): 32-57.
Mufti, Aamir R. “Orientalism and the Institution of World Literatures.” Critical Inquiry 36/3 (2010): 458-493.
Muhanna, Elias. The World in a Book: Al-Nuwayrī and the Islamic Encyclopedic Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Murata, Sachiko. Chinese Gleams of Sufi Light: Wang Tai-yü’s Great Learning of the Pure and Real and Liu Chih’s Displaying the Concealment of the Real Realm. Albany: SUNY Press, 2000.
Navāʾī, ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn. Shāh Ṭahmāsb-i Ṣafavī: Majmūʿa-yi Asnād u Mukātabāt-i Tārīkhī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān, 1350 Sh./1971.
Petersen, Kristian. Interpreting Islam in China: Pilgrimage, Scripture, and Language in the Han Kitab. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Pollock, Sheldon. “Philology and Freedom.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 4-30.
Pollock, Sheldon. “Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.” Critical Inquiry 35/4 (2009): 931-961.
Porter, James I. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
Pourjavady, Reza and Sabine Schmidtke. “An Eastern Renaissance? Greek Philosophy under the Safavids (16th-18th Centuries AD).” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 3 (2015): 248-290.
Plofker, Kim. Mathematics in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Ragep, F. Jamil. “Copernicus and His Islamic Predecessors: Some Historical Remarks.” Filozofski Vestnik 25/2 (2004): 125-141.
Raz-Krakotzkin, Amnon. The Censor, the Editor, and the Text: The Catholic Church and the Shaping of the Jewish Canon in the Sixteenth Century. Translated by Jackie Feldman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
Said, Edward. “The Return to Philology.” In idem, Humanism and Democratic Criticism, 57-84. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Saliba, George. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge [MASS]: MIT Press, 2007.
Schöller, Marco. “Zum Begriff des ‘islamischen Humanismus.’” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Mogenländischen Gesellschaft 151 (2001): 275-320.
Şen, Ahmet Tunç. “Astrology in the Service of the Empire: Knowledge, Prognostication, and Politics at the Ottoman Court, 1450s-1550s.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2016.
Shulman, David. More than Real: A History of the Imagination in South India. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Siniossoglou, Niketas. Radical Platonism in Byzantium: Illumination and Utopia in Gemistos Plethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Turning the Stones Over: Sixteenth-Century Millenarianism from the Tagus to the Ganges.” Indian Economic and Social Review 40/2 (2003): 129-161.
Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. “Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Modern Asian Studies 31/3 (1997): 735-762.
Taussig, Michael. The Magic of the State. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Truschke, Audrey. Culture of Encounters: Sanskrit at the Mughal Court. Columbia University Press, 2016.
Varlık, Nükhet. “Books on Medicine: Medical Knowledge at Work.” In the edition of Hungarian National Library MS Török F. 59, Supplements to Muqarnas Series, edited by Gülru Necipoğlu, Cemal Kafadar, Cornell Fleischer. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming 2018.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 912 | 190 | 33 |
Full Text Views | 300 | 15 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 208 | 34 | 1 |
This essay reviews a major new study of European Renaissance Arabist-humanist philology as it was actually practiced, humanist neoclassicizing anti-Arabism notwithstanding. While definitive and philologically magisterial, that study nevertheless falls prey structurally and conceptually to the very eurocentrism whose ideological-textual genesis it chronicles. Situating it within the comparative global early modern philologies framework that has now been proposed in the volume World Philology and the present journal is a necessary remedy—but only a partial one; for that framework too still obscures the multiplicity of specifically genetically Western early modernities, thus hobbling comparative history of philology. I therefore propose a new framework appropriate to the study of Greco-Arabo-Persian and Greco-Arabo-Latin as the two parallel and equally powerful philosophical-philological trajectories that together defined early modern Western—i.e., Hellenic-Abrahamic, Islamo-Judeo-Christian, west of South India—intellectual history: taḥqīq vs. taqlīd, progressivism vs. declinism.
But a broadened and more balanced analytical framework alone cannot save philology, much less Western civilization, from the throes of its current existential crisis: for we philologists of the Euro-American academy are fevered too by the cosmological ill that is reflexive scientistic materialism. As antidote, I prescribe a progressivist, postmodern return to early modern Western deconstructive-reconstructive cosmic philology as prerequisite for the discipline’s survival, and perhaps even triumph, in the teeth of totalitarian colonialist-capitalist modernity.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 912 | 190 | 33 |
Full Text Views | 300 | 15 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 208 | 34 | 1 |