This essay reviews a major new study of European Renaissance Arabist-humanist philology as it was actually practiced, humanist neoclassicizing anti-Arabism notwithstanding. While definitive and philologically magisterial, that study nevertheless falls prey structurally and conceptually to the very eurocentrism whose ideological-textual genesis it chronicles. Situating it within the comparative global early modern philologies framework that has now been proposed in the volume World Philology and the present journal is a necessary remedy—but only a partial one; for that framework too still obscures the multiplicity of specifically genetically Western early modernities, thus hobbling comparative history of philology. I therefore propose a new framework appropriate to the study of Greco-Arabo-Persian and Greco-Arabo-Latin as the two parallel and equally powerful philosophical-philological trajectories that together defined early modern Western—i.e., Hellenic-Abrahamic, Islamo-Judeo-Christian, west of South India—intellectual history: taḥqīq vs. taqlīd, progressivism vs. declinism.
But a broadened and more balanced analytical framework alone cannot save philology, much less Western civilization, from the throes of its current existential crisis: for we philologists of the Euro-American academy are fevered too by the cosmological ill that is reflexive scientistic materialism. As antidote, I prescribe a progressivist, postmodern return to early modern Western deconstructive-reconstructive cosmic philology as prerequisite for the discipline’s survival, and perhaps even triumph, in the teeth of totalitarian colonialist-capitalist modernity.
ElmanBenjamin A.“Early Modern or Late Imperial? The Crisis of Classical Philology in Eighteenth-Century China.” In World Philology edited by SheldonPollockBenjamin A.ElmanKu-ming KevinChang225-244. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2015.
El-RouayhebKhaled. “The Rise of ‘Deep Reading’ in Early Modern Ottoman Scholarly Culture.” In World Philology edited by SheldonPollockBenjamin A.ElmanKuming KevinChang201-224. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2015.
Erünsalİsmail E.Ottoman Libraries: A Survey of the History Development and Organization of the Ottoman Foundation Libraries. Cambridge [MASS]: The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Literatures, Harvard University2008.
FleischerCornell H.“Ancient Wisdom and New Sciences: Prophecies at the Ottoman Court in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens edited by MassumehFarhad and SerpilBağcı232-243. London: Thames & Hudson2009.
LelićEmin. “Physiognomy (ʿilm-i firāsat) and Ottoman Statecraft: Discerning Morality and Justice.” In Islamicate Occultism: New Perspectives edited by MatthewMelvin-Koushki and NoahGardiner. Special double issue of Arabica64/3-4 (2017): 609-646.
Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. The Occult Science of Empire in Aqquyunlu-Safavid Iran: Two Shirazi Lettrists. With an Edition and Translation of Jalāl al-Dīn Davānī’s A Spiritual Boon and Maḥmūd Dihdār’s Choicest Talismans. Forthcoming.
Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire: New Forms of Religiopolitical Legitimacy. In The Wiley-Blackwell History of Islam edited by ArmandoSalvatoreRobertoTottoliBabakRahimi353-375. Malden [MASS]: Wiley-Blackwell2018.
Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “(De)colonizing Early Modern Occult Philosophy.”Review essay on Liana Saif The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2015). Magic Ritual and Witchcraft12/1 (2017): 98-112.
Raz-KrakotzkinAmnon. The Censor the Editor and the Text: The Catholic Church and the Shaping of the Jewish Canon in the Sixteenth Century. Translated by JackieFeldman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press2007.
VarlıkNükhet. “Books on Medicine: Medical Knowledge at Work.”In the edition of Hungarian National Library MS Török F. 59Supplements to Muqarnas Series edited by GülruNecipoğluCemalKafadarCornellFleischer. Leiden: Brillforthcoming 2018.