Taḥqīq vs. Taqlīd in the Renaissances of Western Early Modernity

in Philological Encounters
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This essay reviews a major new study of European Renaissance Arabist-humanist philology as it was actually practiced, humanist neoclassicizing anti-Arabism notwithstanding. While definitive and philologically magisterial, that study nevertheless falls prey structurally and conceptually to the very eurocentrism whose ideological-textual genesis it chronicles. Situating it within the comparative global early modern philologies framework that has now been proposed in the volume World Philology and the present journal is a necessary remedy—but only a partial one; for that framework too still obscures the multiplicity of specifically genetically Western early modernities, thus hobbling comparative history of philology. I therefore propose a new framework appropriate to the study of Greco-Arabo-Persian and Greco-Arabo-Latin as the two parallel and equally powerful philosophical-philological trajectories that together defined early modern Western—i.e., Hellenic-Abrahamic, Islamo-Judeo-Christian, west of South India—intellectual history: taḥqīq vs. taqlīd, progressivism vs. declinism.

But a broadened and more balanced analytical framework alone cannot save philology, much less Western civilization, from the throes of its current existential crisis: for we philologists of the Euro-American academy are fevered too by the cosmological ill that is reflexive scientistic materialism. As antidote, I prescribe a progressivist, postmodern return to early modern Western deconstructive-reconstructive cosmic philology as prerequisite for the discipline’s survival, and perhaps even triumph, in the teeth of totalitarian colonialist-capitalist modernity.

Taḥqīq vs. Taqlīd in the Renaissances of Western Early Modernity

in Philological Encounters



AlamMuzaffar. “Mughal Philology and Rūmī’s Mathnavī.” In World Philology edited by Sheldon PollockBenjamin A. ElmanKu-ming Kevin Chang178-200. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2015.

al-ʿĀmilīBahāʾ al-Dīn Muḥammad. Kulliyyāt-i Ashʿār u Āsār-i Fārsī-yi Shaykh Bahāʾī. Edited by ʿAlī Kātibīintroduction by Saʿīd Nafīsī. Tehran: Chakāma1383 Sh./2004.

AydinCemil. The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2017.

BaconFrancis. New Atlantis. A Worke unfinished. London1627.

BauerThomas. “Mamluk Literature: Misunderstandings and New Approaches.” Mamlūk Studies Review 9/2 (2005): 105-132.

BeecroftAlexander. An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day. London: Verso2015.

BernsAndrew D. The Bible and Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Italy: Jewish and Christian Physicians in Search of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2015.

BonoJames J. “Making Knowledge: History, Literature, and the Poetics of Science.” Isis 101/3 (2010): 555-559.

BonoJames J. The Word of God and the Languages of Man: Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press1995.

BrennanTimothy. Borrowed Light: Vico Hegel and the Colonies. Stanford: Stanford University Press2014.

BullietRichard. The Case for Islamo-Christian Civilization. New York: Columbia University Press2004.

BuschAllison. “The Anxiety of Innovation: The Practice of Literary Science in the Hindi/Riti Tradition.” Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East 24/2 (2004): 45-59.

ChittickWilliam C. Science of the Cosmos Science of the Soul: The Pertinence of Islamic Cosmology in the Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld2007.

DallalAhmad. Islam without Europe: Traditions of Reform in Eighteenth-Century Islamic Thought. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Pressforthcoming 2018.

DayehIslam. “The Potential of World Philology.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 396-418.

DudneyArthur. “Metaphorical Language as a Battleground for Tradition and Newness in Late Mughal Persian.” International Journal of Persian Literature 2 (2017): 138-160.

Dudney Arthur. “A Desire for Meaning: Ḳhān-i Ārzū’s Philology and the Place of India in the Eighteenth-Century Persianate World.” PhD diss. Columbia University 2013.

EbsteinMichael. Mysticism and Philosophy in al-Andalus: Ibn Masarra Ibn al-ʿArabī and the Ismāʿīlī Tradition. Leiden: Brill2014.

ElmanBenjamin A. “Early Modern or Late Imperial? The Crisis of Classical Philology in Eighteenth-Century China.” In World Philology edited by Sheldon PollockBenjamin A. ElmanKu-ming Kevin Chang225-244. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2015.

ElmoreGerald T. Islamic Sainthood in the Fullness of Time: Ibn al-ʿArabī’s Book of the Fabulous Gryphon. Leiden: Brill1999.

El-RouayhebKhaled. Islamic Intellectual History in the Seventeenth Century: Scholarly Currents in the Ottoman Empire and the Maghreb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2015.

El-RouayhebKhaled. “The Rise of ‘Deep Reading’ in Early Modern Ottoman Scholarly Culture.” In World Philology edited by Sheldon PollockBenjamin A. ElmanKuming Kevin Chang201-224. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2015.

EndressGerhard. “Philosophische Ein-Band-Bibliotheken aus Isfahan.” Oriens 36 (2001): 10-58.

Erünsalİsmail E. Ottoman Libraries: A Survey of the History Development and Organization of the Ottoman Foundation Libraries. Cambridge [MASS]: The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Literatures, Harvard University2008.

FleischerCornell H. “Ancient Wisdom and New Sciences: Prophecies at the Ottoman Court in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries.” In Falnama: The Book of Omens edited by Massumeh Farhad and Serpil Bağcı232-243. London: Thames & Hudson2009.

FowdenGarth. Before and after Muḥammad: The First Millennium Refocused. Princeton: Princeton University Press2014.

Gandhi Supriya. “Mughal Self-Fashioning Indic Self-Realization: Dārā Shikoh and Persian Textual Cultures in Early Modern South Asia.” PhD diss. Harvard University 2011.

GaneriJonardon. The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450-1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press2011.

GardinerNoah. “The Occultist Encyclopedism of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Bisṭāmī.” Mamlūk Studies Review 20 (2017): 3-38.

Gardiner Noah. “Esotericism in a Manuscript Culture: Aḥmad al-Būnī and His Readers through the Mamlūk Period.” PhD diss. University of Michigan 2014.

GutasDimitri. “The Intentions of the Philosophers, Avicenna and after: The History of Science Background.” Forthcoming.

GutasDimitri. Greek Thought Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th Centuries). New York: Routledge1998.

HåkanssonHåkan. Seeing the Word: John Dee and Renaissance Occultism. Lund: Lund University Press2001.

HalbertalMoshe. Concealment and Revelation: Esotericism in Jewish Thought and Its Philosophical Implications. Translated by Jackie Feldman. Princeton: Princeton University Press2007.

HannaNelly. In Praise of Books: A Cultural History of Cairo’s Middle Class Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century. Syracuse [NY]: Syracuse University Press2003.

HirschlerKonrad. Medieval Damascus: Plurality and Diversity in an Arabic Library: The Ashrafīya Library Catalogue. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2016.

HirschlerKonrad. The Written Word in the Medieval Arabic Lands: A Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press2013.

HodgsonMarshall G. S. The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization. 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press1974.

Ibn ʿArabī. Risālat al-Intiṣār. In Rasāʾil Ibn ʿArabī edited by Muḥammad Shihāb al-Dīn al-ʿArabī336-348. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir1997.

Joost-GaugierChristiane L. Pythagoras and Renaissance Europe: Finding Heaven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2014.

Josephson-StormJason Ā. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic Modernity and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press2017.

KaldellisAnthony and Niketas Siniossoglou eds. The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2017.

KiaMana. Sensibilities of Belonging: Transregional Persianate Community before Nationalism. Forthcoming.

KilleenKevin and Peter J. Forshaw eds. The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan2007.

KinraRajeev. “Cultures of Comparative Philology in the Early Modern Indo-Persian World.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 225-287.

KraemerJoel L. Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam: The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. 2nd revised edition. Leiden: Brill1992.

LatourBruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press1993.

LelićEmin. “Physiognomy (ʿilm-i firāsat) and Ottoman Statecraft: Discerning Morality and Justice.” In Islamicate Occultism: New Perspectives edited by Matthew Melvin-Koushki and Noah Gardiner. Special double issue of Arabica 64/3-4 (2017): 609-646.

MasuzawaTomoko. The Invention of World Religions: Or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press2005.

McGannJerome. “Philology in a New Key.” Critical Inquiry 39/2 (2013): 327-346.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. The Occult Science of Empire in Aqquyunlu-Safavid Iran: Two Shirazi Lettrists. With an Edition and Translation of Jalāl al-Dīn Davānī’s A Spiritual Boon and Maḥmūd Dihdār’s Choicest Talismans. Forthcoming.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “World as (Arabic) Text: Mīr Dāmād and the Neopythagoreanization of Philosophy in Safavid Iran.” Forthcoming.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “The Occult Sciences in Safavid Iran and Safavid Occultists Abroad.” In The Safavid World edited by Rudi Matthee. New York: Routledgeforthcoming 2019.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “Early Modern Islamicate Empire: New Forms of Religiopolitical Legitimacy. In The Wiley-Blackwell History of Islam edited by Armando SalvatoreRoberto TottoliBabak Rahimi 353-375. Malden [MASS]: Wiley-Blackwell2018.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “Powers of One: The Mathematicalization of the Occult Sciences in the High Persianate Tradition.” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 5/1 (2017): 127-199.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “(De)colonizing Early Modern Occult Philosophy.” Review essay on Liana Saif The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2015). Magic Ritual and Witchcraft 12/1 (2017): 98-112.

Melvin-KoushkiMatthew. “Of Islamic Grammatology: Ibn Turka’s Lettrist Metaphysics of Light.” Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā 24 (2016): 42-113.

Mīr Dāmād. Jaẕavāt u Mavāqīt. Edited by ʿAlī Awjabīwith glosses by Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī. Tehran: Mīrās̱-i Maktūb1380 Sh./2001.

MitchellColin P. The Practice of Politics in Safavid Iran: Power Religion and Rhetoric. London: I.B. Tauris2009.

MooreAlan. Promethea. No. 32America’s Best ComicsApril 2005.

MorrisonRobert. “A Scholarly Intermediary between the Ottoman Empire and Renaissance Europe.” Isis 105/1 (2014): 32-57.

MuftiAamir R. “Orientalism and the Institution of World Literatures.” Critical Inquiry 36/3 (2010): 458-493.

MuhannaElias. The World in a Book: Al-Nuwayrī and the Islamic Encyclopedic Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press2017.

MurataSachiko. Chinese Gleams of Sufi Light: Wang Tai-yü’s Great Learning of the Pure and Real and Liu Chih’s Displaying the Concealment of the Real Realm. Albany: SUNY Press2000.

NavāʾīʿAbd al-Ḥusayn. Shāh Ṭahmāsb-i Ṣafavī: Majmūʿa-yi Asnād u Mukātabāt-i Tārīkhī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān1350 Sh./1971.

PetersenKristian. Interpreting Islam in China: Pilgrimage Scripture and Language in the Han Kitab. Oxford: Oxford University Press2017.

PollockSheldon. “Philology and Freedom.” Philological Encounters 1 (2016): 4-30.

PollockSheldon. “Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.” Critical Inquiry 35/4 (2009): 931-961.

PorterJames I. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford: Stanford University Press2000.

PourjavadyReza and Sabine Schmidtke. “An Eastern Renaissance? Greek Philosophy under the Safavids (16th-18th Centuries AD).” Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 3 (2015): 248-290.

PlofkerKim. Mathematics in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press2009.

RagepF. Jamil. “Copernicus and His Islamic Predecessors: Some Historical Remarks.” Filozofski Vestnik 25/2 (2004): 125-141.

Raz-KrakotzkinAmnon. The Censor the Editor and the Text: The Catholic Church and the Shaping of the Jewish Canon in the Sixteenth Century. Translated by Jackie Feldman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press2007.

SaidEdward. “The Return to Philology.” In idem Humanism and Democratic Criticism57-84. New York: Columbia University Press2004.

SalibaGeorge. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge [MASS]: MIT Press2007.

SchöllerMarco. “Zum Begriff des ‘islamischen Humanismus.’” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Mogenländischen Gesellschaft 151 (2001): 275-320.

Şen Ahmet Tunç. “Astrology in the Service of the Empire: Knowledge Prognostication and Politics at the Ottoman Court 1450s-1550s.” PhD diss. University of Chicago 2016.

ShulmanDavid. More than Real: A History of the Imagination in South India. Cambridge [MASS]: Harvard University Press2012.

SiniossoglouNiketas. Radical Platonism in Byzantium: Illumination and Utopia in Gemistos Plethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2011.

SubrahmanyamSanjay. “Turning the Stones Over: Sixteenth-Century Millenarianism from the Tagus to the Ganges.” Indian Economic and Social Review 40/2 (2003): 129-161.

SubrahmanyamSanjay. “Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia.” Modern Asian Studies 31/3 (1997): 735-762.

TaussigMichael. The Magic of the State. New York: Routledge1998.

TruschkeAudrey. Culture of Encounters: Sanskrit at the Mughal Court. Columbia University Press2016.

VarlıkNükhet. “Books on Medicine: Medical Knowledge at Work.” In the edition of Hungarian National Library MS Török F. 59Supplements to Muqarnas Series edited by Gülru NecipoğluCemal KafadarCornell Fleischer. Leiden: Brillforthcoming 2018.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 47 47 16
Full Text Views 24 24 21
PDF Downloads 5 5 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0