Visual and Verbal Commentaries in Renaissance Astronomy: Erasmus Reinhold’s Treatment of Classical Sources on Astronomy
In: Philological EncountersAbstract
Immediately following the publication of Copernicus’s major work, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (Nuremberg, 1543), the renowned Renaissance astronomer Erasmus Reinhold of Saalfeld (1511–1553) issued a Greek-and-Latin edition of the first book of Ptolemy’s Almagest with commentaries. It was entitled Ptolemaei Mathematicae constructionis liber primus (Wittenberg, in 1549). Employing images and textual commentaries, Reinhold aimed to make Ptolemy’s work accessible to his students at the University of Wittenberg. The commentary strengthened fundamental cosmological arguments presented in the first book of the Almagest, especially the central position of the Earth in the cosmos and its immobility. The Reinhold edition documents Renaissance commentary practices and their dynamic and transformative character. It is argued that the publication of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory motivated astronomy professors such as Reinhold to reassess Ptolemy’s cosmological arguments and analyze them with renewed interest.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Copernicus, Nicolaus. Receptio Copernicana: Texte zur Aufnahme der copernicanischen Theorie, edited by Heribert M. Nobis and Anna Maria Pastori. Berlin: Akademie, 2002.
-
Milichius, Iacobus. Commentarii In Librum Secvndum Historiae Mundi C. Plinii. Hagenau, 1535.
-
Milichius, Iacobus. Commentarii In Librum Secvndum Historiae Mundi C. Plinii. Frankfurt/Main, 1543.
-
Pliny. Natural History, books 1–2. Cambridge, MA-London, 1938 [repr. 1991].
-
Ptolemy (Ptolemaeus, Claudius). Almagestum, Venetiis: Liechtenstein, 1515.
-
Ptolemy (Ptolemaeus, Claudius). Almagestum seu Magne Constructionis Mathematicae … Latina donatum lingua ab Georgio Trapezuntio. Venice, 1528.
-
Ptolemy (Ptolemaeus, Claudius). Mathematicae constructionis Liber primus graece et latine editus. Additae explications aliquot locorum ab Erasmo Reinhold Salveldensi. Wittebergae: Ex Officina Iohannis Lufft, 1549.
-
Ptolemy (Ptolemaeus, Claudius). Mathematicae constructionis Liber secundus Latina interpretatione recens donatus. Lutetiae: Cavellat, [1556].
-
Ptolemy (Ptolemaeus, Claudius). Almagest, edited by Gerald J. Toomer. London: Duckworth, 1983.
-
[Reinhold, Erasmus]. Commentarius in opus Revolutionum Copernici, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, coll. Ms. lat. fol. 391.
-
[Reinhold, Erasmus]. Oratio de Iohanne Regiomontano mathematico, in Selectissimarum orationum clarissimi viri Domini Philippi Melanchthonis, tome 3 [ff. 157r-172v]. Erphurdiae: Excussit Gervasius Sturmer, 1551.
-
Theon of Alexandria. Εἰς τοῦ Πτολεµαίου µεγάλην σύνταξιν ὐποµνηµάτων βιβλ. ιᾱ (=XI). Basileae: Apud Ioannem Walderum, 1538.
-
Ziegler, Jakob. In C. Plinii de naturali historia librum secundum commentarius, quo difficultates Plinianae, praesertim astronomicae, omnes tolluntur. Basileae: Excudebat Henricus Petrus, 1531.
-
Barker, Peter. “The Hypotyposes orbium coelestium (Strasbourg, 1568).” In Nouveau ciel, nouvelle terre: La révolution copernicienne dans l’Allemagne de la Réforme (1530–1630), edited by M. A. Granada and E. Mehl, 85–108. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2009.
-
Barker, Peter and Bernard R. Goldstein. “Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal.” Perspectives on Science vi/3 (1998): 232–258.
-
Bauer, Barbara. Melanchthon und die Marburger Professoren (1527–1627). Marburg, 2009.
-
Bellucci, Dino. Science de la Nature et Réformation: La physique au service de la Réforme dans l’enseignement de Philippe Mélanchthon. Rome: Edizioni Vivere In, 1998.
-
Birkenmajer, Aleksander. “Le commentaire inédit d’Erasme Reinhold sur le De revolutionibus de Nicolas Copernic.” In La Science au Seizième Siècle, 171–177. Paris: Hermann, 1960.
-
Brosseder, Claudia. Im Bann der Sterne: Caspar Peucer, Philipp Melanchthon und andere Wittenberger Astrologen. Berlin: Akademie, 2004.
-
Caroti, Stefano. “Melanchthon’s Astrology.” In “Astrologi Hallucinati:” Stars and the End of the World in Luther’s Time, edited by Paola Zambelli, 109–121. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
-
Gindhart, Marion. Das Kometenjahr 1618: Antikes und zeitgenössisches Wissen in der frühneuzeitlichen Kometenliteratur des deutschsprachigen Raumes. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert, 2006.
-
Gingerich, Owen. An Annotated Census of Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus (Nuremberg, 1543 and Basel, 1566). Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2002.
-
Gingerich, Owen. “Erasmus Reinhold and the Dissemination of Copernican Theory.” In The Eye of Heaven: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, 221–251. New York: American Institute of Physics Press, 1993.
-
Gingerich, Owen. “Reinhold, Erasmus.” In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, edited by Charles Coulston Gilliespie, xi, 365–367. New York: Scribner, 1975.
-
Gingerich, Owen. The Book Nobody Read: Chasing the Revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus. New York: Walker & Company, 2004.
-
Gingerich, Owen and Robert S. Westman. “The Wittich Connection: Conflict and Priority in Late Sixteenth-Century Cosmology.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 78/7 (1988): i-viii+1–148.
-
Jardine, Nicholas and Alain Segonds. La guerre des astronomes: La querelle au sujet de l’origine du système géo-héliocentrique à la fin du XVIe siècle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2008.
-
Kathe, Heinz. Die Wittenberger philosophische Fakultät 1502–1817. Köln-Weimar-Wien: Böhlau, 2002.
-
Kremer, Richard L. “Kepler and the Graz Calendar Makers: Computational Foundations for Astrological Prognostication.” In Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań, edited by R. Kremer and J. Włodarczyk, 77–100. Warsaw: Instytut Historii Nauki PAN, 2009.
-
Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
-
Manitius, K. “Einleitung” (introduction) to Ptolemäus. In Handbuch der Astronomie, translated and annotated by K. Manitius. Leipzig: Teubner, 1963.
-
Meinel, Christoph. “Certa deus toti impressit vestigia mundo: Melanchthons Naturphilosophie.” In Der Humanist als Reformator: Über Leben, Werk und Wirkung Philipp Melanchthons, edited by Michael Fricke, 229–251. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2011.
-
Most, Glenn (ed.). Commentaries / Kommentare. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1999.
-
Omodeo, Pietro D. Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance: Reception, Legacy, Transformation. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
-
Omodeo, Pietro D. “Sixteenth Century Professors of Mathematics at the German University of Helmstedt: A Case Study on Renaissance Scholarly Work and Networks.” Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 417 (2011).
-
Omodeo, Pietro D. with Karin Friedrich. Duncan Liddel (1561–1613): Networks of Polymathy and the Northern European Renaissance. Leiden: Brill, 2016.
-
Omodeo, Pietro D. and Irina Tupikova. “Cosmology and Epistemology: A Comparison between Aristotle’s and Ptolemy’s Approaches to Geocentrism.” In Spatial Thinking and External Representation: Towards a Historical Epistemology of Space, edited by Matthias Schemmel, 145–174. Berlin: Edition Open Access, 2016.
-
Omodeo, Pietro D. and Irina Tupikova. “Post-Copernican Reception of Ptolemy: Erasmus Reinhold’s Commented Edition of the Almagest, Book One (Wittenberg, 1549).” Journal for the History of Astronomy (2013): 235–256.
-
Pantin, Isabelle. “Francesco Giuntini et les nouveautés celestes.” In Celestial Novelties on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution, 1540–1630, edited by Dario Tessicini and Patrick Boner, 85–104. Florence: Olschki, 2013.
-
Pantin, Isabelle. “La Lettre de Melanchthon à S. Grynaeus: Les avatars d’une apologie de l’astrologie.” In Divination et controverse religieuse en France au XVIe siècle, edited by Robert Aulotte, 85–101. Paris: Éditions Rues d’Ulm, 1987.
-
Pantin, Isabelle. “The First Phases of the Theoricae planetarum Printed Tradition (1474–1535): the Evolution of a Genre Observed through its Image.” Journal for the History of Astronomy xliii (2012): 3–26.
-
Reich, Karin. “Philipp Melanchthon im Dialog mit Astronomen und Mathematikern: Ausgewählte Beispiele.” In Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften in der Zeit von Philipp Melanchthon, edited by Franz Fuchs, 27–58. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012.
-
Rose, Paul Lawrence. The Italian Renaissance of Mathematics: Studies on Humanists and Mathematicians from Petrarch to Galileo. Geneva: Droz, 1975.
-
Savoie, Denis. “La diffusion du copernicanisme au XVIe siècle: Les Tables Pruténique.” L’Astronomie cxi (1997): 45–50.
-
Swerdlow, Noel M. and Otto Neugebauer. Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De revolutionibus. New York: Springer, 1984.
-
Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science, vol. 5. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.
-
Thüringer, Walter. “Paul Eber (1511–1569): Melanchthons Physik und seine Stellung zu Copernicus.” In Melanchthon in seinen Schülern, edited by H. Scheible, 285–321. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1997.
-
Westman, Robert S. “The Melanchthon circle, Rheticus and the Wittenberg interpretation of the Copernican theory.” Isis 66 (1975): 163–193.
-
Zambelli, Paola. Astrologi Hallucinati: Stars and the End of the World in Luther’s Time. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 524 | 131 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 65 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 54 | 8 | 0 |
Visual and Verbal Commentaries in Renaissance Astronomy: Erasmus Reinhold’s Treatment of Classical Sources on Astronomy
In: Philological EncountersAbstract
Immediately following the publication of Copernicus’s major work, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (Nuremberg, 1543), the renowned Renaissance astronomer Erasmus Reinhold of Saalfeld (1511–1553) issued a Greek-and-Latin edition of the first book of Ptolemy’s Almagest with commentaries. It was entitled Ptolemaei Mathematicae constructionis liber primus (Wittenberg, in 1549). Employing images and textual commentaries, Reinhold aimed to make Ptolemy’s work accessible to his students at the University of Wittenberg. The commentary strengthened fundamental cosmological arguments presented in the first book of the Almagest, especially the central position of the Earth in the cosmos and its immobility. The Reinhold edition documents Renaissance commentary practices and their dynamic and transformative character. It is argued that the publication of Copernicus’s heliocentric theory motivated astronomy professors such as Reinhold to reassess Ptolemy’s cosmological arguments and analyze them with renewed interest.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 524 | 131 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 65 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 54 | 8 | 0 |