The City and the Law. Aspects of Ibn Khaldūn’s Critique of the Philosophers
In: Philological EncountersAbstract
The history of Khaldunian readings in the twentieth century reveals an analytical capacity of non-Orientalists definitely greater than that demonstrated by the Orientalists. The latter, at least until the 1950s, prove to be prisoners of that syndrome denounced by Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978), which projected on Islamic historical development a specificity and an alterity, which make it an exception in world history. Orientalist scholarship has often wanted to see in Ibn Khaldūn’s critical attitude to the philosophy of al-Fārābī and Averroes only the confirmation of the primacy of the sharīʿa over Platonic nomos. This article seeks to highlight some aspects of Ibn Khaldūn’s critique of classical political thought of Islamic philosophy. His critique focuses on the importance given to the juridical dimension of social becoming, and to the role of the political body of the jurists in the making of the City. Those aspects witness Ibn Khaldūn’s effort to interpret change and fractures as factors which make sense of history and decadence.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abu Lughod, Janet L. “The Islamic City—Historic Myth, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 19 (1987): 155–176.
-
Al-Azmeh, Aziz. Ibn Khaldūn in Modern Scholarship. London: Third World Centre for Research and Publishing, 1981.
-
Ardiç, Nurullah. “Khaldunian Studies Today: the Contributions of Syed Farid Alatas.” Journal of Historical Sociology 30 (2017): 77–85.
-
Baali, Fuad. Society, State and Urbanism: Ibn Khaldun’s Sociological Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.
-
Becker, Carl Heinrich. “Der Islam als Problem.” Der Islam 1 (1910): 1–21.
-
Bousquet, Georges Henri. Les textes sociologiques et économiques de la Muqaddima (1375–1379). Paris: Éditions Marcel Rivière, 1965.
-
Carré, Olivier. L’utopie islamique dans l’Orient arabe. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1991.
-
Foucault, Michel. Sourveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1975.
-
Gibb, Hamilton A. R. “The Islamic Background of Ibn Khaldun’s Political Thought.” Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 7 (1933): 23–31.
-
Hallaq, Wael. “Caliphs, Jurists and Saljūqs in the Political Thought of al-Juwaynī.” The Muslim World 74 (1984): 26–41.
-
Hourani, H. Albert, Stern, Samuel M., eds. The Islamic City. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer, 1967.
-
Ibn Khaldūn. Muqaddima. Beirut: Dār al-qalām, 1986.
-
Ibn Khaldūn. The Muqaddimah. An Introduction to History. Translated by Franz Rosenthal, 3 vols. New York: Pantheon Books, 1958.
-
Irwin, Robert. Ibn Khaldūn. An Intellectual Biography. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2018.
-
Jayyusi, Salma Khadra, Holod, Renata, Petruccioli, Attilio, and Raymond, André, eds. The City in the Islamic World. 2 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2008.
-
Khalidi, Muhammad ʿAli. “Orientalism, Neo-Orientalism and Oriental Orientalism in the Interpretation of Islamic Philosophy.” Radical Philosophy 135 (2006): 25–33.
-
Lacoste, Yves. Ibn Khaldoun, naissance de l’histoire, passé du Tiers Monde. Paris: Maspero, 1966.
-
Mahdi, Muhsin. Ibn Khaldūn’s Philosophy of History: A Study in the Philosophic Foundation of the Science of Culture. London: Allen and Unwin, 1957.
-
Mazzarino, Santo. The End of the Ancient World. Translated by George Holmes. London: Faber, 1966.
-
Mikhail, Hanna. Politics and Revelation. Mawardi and After. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
-
Morrone, Giovanni. “Europa e Islam nella polemica fra Ernst Troleltsch e Carl Heinrich Becker.” Civiltà del Mediterraneo V–VI (2008): 137–163.
-
Mzoughi, Mohamed. “Ibn Khaldūn and Philosophy: A Critical Approach.” In Studies on Ibn Khaldūn. Edited by Massimo Campanini, 145–180. Milan: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher, 2005.
-
Rosenthal, Erwin I. J. Political Thought in Medieval Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956.
-
Safi, Omid. The Politics of Knowledge in Premodern Islam. Negotiating Ideology and Religious Inquiry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina University, 2006.
-
Shatzmiller, Maya. Labour in the Medieval Islamic World. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.
-
Shihade, Magid. “Rediscovering Religion and Secularism. A Critique of a Critique.” Social Transformation 4 (2016): 3–25.
-
Strauss, Leo. Philosophy and Law. Contributions to the Understanding of Maimonides and his Predecessors. Translated by Eve Adler. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
-
Tamer, George. “The Curse of Philosophy: Ibn Taymiyya as a Philosopher in Contemporary Islamic Thought.” In Islamic Theology, Philosophy and Law: Debating Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya. Edited by Birgit Krawietz and George Tamer, 329–374. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
-
Van Ess, Josef. “From Wellhausen to Becker: the Emergence of Kulturgeschichte in Islamic Studies.” In Islamic Studies, a Tradition and its Problems. Edited by Malcom Kerr, 27–51. Malibu: Undena Publications, 1980.
-
Walzer, Richard. “Aspects of Islamic Political Thought: al-Fārābī and Ibn Xaldūn.” Oriens 15 (1963): 40–60.
-
Zaid, Ahmad. The Epistemology of Ibn Khaldūn. London and New York: Routledge & Curzon, 2003.
-
Zaid, Ahmad. Ibn Khaldūn’s Approach in Civilisational Studies. In Studies on Ibn Khaldūn. Edited by Massimo Campanini, 101–122. Milan: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher, 2005.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 417 | 84 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 56 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 82 | 10 | 1 |
The City and the Law. Aspects of Ibn Khaldūn’s Critique of the Philosophers
In: Philological EncountersAbstract
The history of Khaldunian readings in the twentieth century reveals an analytical capacity of non-Orientalists definitely greater than that demonstrated by the Orientalists. The latter, at least until the 1950s, prove to be prisoners of that syndrome denounced by Edward Said’s Orientalism (1978), which projected on Islamic historical development a specificity and an alterity, which make it an exception in world history. Orientalist scholarship has often wanted to see in Ibn Khaldūn’s critical attitude to the philosophy of al-Fārābī and Averroes only the confirmation of the primacy of the sharīʿa over Platonic nomos. This article seeks to highlight some aspects of Ibn Khaldūn’s critique of classical political thought of Islamic philosophy. His critique focuses on the importance given to the juridical dimension of social becoming, and to the role of the political body of the jurists in the making of the City. Those aspects witness Ibn Khaldūn’s effort to interpret change and fractures as factors which make sense of history and decadence.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 417 | 84 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 56 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 82 | 10 | 1 |