Save

The Poetics of Persianate Disaffiliation: Recusative Gestures for a Royal Genre

In: Philological Encounters
Author:
Samuel Hodgkin Department of Comparative Literature, Yale University New Haven, Connecticut USA

Search for other papers by Samuel Hodgkin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-1994
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Across the Persianate regions of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Eurasia, the discourse of modernization had a deep, perhaps even dominant aesthetic dimension. Apparently disparate anxieties about oriental indolence, homosexuality and unmanliness, flattery and unmeaning speech, and submission to despots all may be understood as elements of a coherent critique of a single literary mode: taghazzul. Insofar as ghazal was a “royal genre” (Ireneusz Opacki), it provided the formal-aesthetic framing for numerous literary and speech genres, and thus for the social and political order. In case studies from across the Persianate zone, this article considers how writers’ refusal of taghazzul, or its excision from their texts, became a recognizable gesture of disaffiliation from the Persianate. In the resulting reordering of the literary field, taghazzul took on new functions in relation to the Western category of lyric.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 287 287 25
Full Text Views 140 140 4
PDF Views & Downloads 91 91 8