Across the Persianate regions of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Eurasia, the discourse of modernization had a deep, perhaps even dominant aesthetic dimension. Apparently disparate anxieties about oriental indolence, homosexuality and unmanliness, flattery and unmeaning speech, and submission to despots all may be understood as elements of a coherent critique of a single literary mode: taghazzul. Insofar as ghazal was a “royal genre” (Ireneusz Opacki), it provided the formal-aesthetic framing for numerous literary and speech genres, and thus for the social and political order. In case studies from across the Persianate zone, this article considers how writers’ refusal of taghazzul, or its excision from their texts, became a recognizable gesture of disaffiliation from the Persianate. In the resulting reordering of the literary field, taghazzul took on new functions in relation to the Western category of lyric.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abedinifard, Mostafa. “Iran’s ‘Self-Deprecating Modernity’: Toward Decolonizing Collective Self-Critique.” IJMES 53 (2021): 406–423.
Ahmadi, Wali. Modern Persian Literature in Afghanistan: Anomalous Visions of History and Form. New York: Routledge, 2008.
Ahmed, Shahab. What Is Islam?: The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton [NJ]: Princeton University Press, 2016.
Ainī, Sadriddin. Kulliët, vol. 8. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1981.
Amanat, Abbas and Assef Ashraf, eds. The Persianate World: Rethinking a Shared Sphere. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Āryānpūr, Yahyā. Az Ṣabā tā Nīmā: tārīkh-i 150 sāl-i adab-i Fārsī. Vol. 1. 5th ed. Tehran: Zuvvār, 1372.
Asrorī, V. Adabiët va fol’klor, vol. 1. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1967.
Atabaki, Turaj. “A Study in the History of Bukharan Modernism: The Journey of Ahmad Danish to St. Petersburg.” In Bamberger Zentralasienstudien, edited by Ingeborg Baldauf and Michael Friederich, 265–268. Islamkundliche Untersuchungen 185. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1994.
Aydın, Cemil. The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Bauer, Thomas and Angelika Neuwirth. “Ghazal as World Literature: Transformations of a Literary Genre.” In Ghazal as World Literature I: Transformations of a Literary Genre, edited by Thomas Bauer and Angelika Neuwirth, 9–31. Beirut: Ergon Verlag Würzburg, 2005.
Bhaskar, Ira and Richard Allen. Islamicate Cultures of Bombay Cinema. New Delhi: Tulika, 2009.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Translated by Susan Emanuel. Stanford [CA]: Stanford University Press, 1995.
Brzostowska-Tereszkiewicz, Tamara. “(Re)Writing the History of Polish Literary Studies Through Translation: The Case of Ireneusz Opacki’s Royal Genres.” Przegląd filozoficzno-literacki 47 (2017): 85–100.
Burney, Fatima. “The Inside Outdoors: Return(s) to Nature in Urdu and Anglophone Poetry.” PhD diss., UCLA, 2017.
Burney, Fatima. “Locating the World in Metaphysical Poetry: The Bardification of Hafiz.” Journal of World Literature 4 (2019): 149–168.
Burney, Fatima and Sara Hakeem Grewal. “Guest Editors’ Introduction: ‘West-East’ Lyric: A Comparative Approach to Lyric History.” Comparative Critical Studies 17, no. 2 (2020): 173–180.
Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Translated by M.B. DeBevoise. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. New edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Chubb-Confer, Francesca. “Islamic Modernity, Lyric Ambiguity: Muhammad Iqbal and the Ghazal.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2020.
Dalrymple, William. The Last Mughal: The Fall of a Dynasty, Delhi, 1857. New York: Knopf, 2007.
Dehkordi, Morteza Hosayni and Parvin Loloi. “Morḡ-e saḥar.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica, updated 2012, https://iranicaonline.org/articles/morg-e-sahar.
De Bruijn, J.T.P. “Ḡazal i. History.” Encyclopaedia Iranica, updated 2012, http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gazal-1-history.
Eisenstadt, Schmuel, ed. Multiple Modernities, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
Ertürk, Nergis. Grammatology and Literary Modernity in Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Fani, Aria. “The Shadow Texts of National History: Poetic Participation in Iran and Afghanistan.” Philological Encounters 8, no. 2–3 (2023).
Farrukhī-Yazdī, Muḥammad. Dīvān. Edited by Ḥusayn Makkī. Tehran: Bunyād-i nashr-i kitab, 1360.
Fatima, Maryam and Andrew Amstutz. “Fashioning a Persianate Offspring for Modern India: Urdu Visions of Persian Pasts, 1890s–1950s.” Philological Encounters 8, no. 2–3 (2023).
Fitrat, Abdurauf. Tanlagan asarlar, vol. 4. Tashkent: Ma’naviyat, 2006.
Furrer, Priska. “The Problematic Tradition: Reflections on Ottoman Homoeroticism in Modern Turkish Literature and Literary Criticism.” In Ghazal as World Literature I: Transformations of a Literary Genre, ed. Thomas Bauer and Angelika Neuwirth, 383–393. Beirut: Ergon Verlag Würzburg, 2005.
Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Translated by Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997.
Ghālib, Mīrzā Asadullah Khān. Kulliyāt-i Ghālib-i fārsī. Vol. 1. Lahore: Majlis-i Taraqqī-i Adab, 2012.
Green, Nile, ed. The Persianate World: The Frontiers of a Eurasian Lingua Franca. Oakland: University of California Press, 2019.
Gökalp, Ziya. The Principles of Turkism. Translated by Robert Devereux. Leiden: Brill, 1968.
Gould, Rebecca Ruth. “Russifying the Radif: Lyric Translatability and the Russo-Persian Ghazal.” Comparative Critical Studies 17, no. 2 (2020): 263–284.
Grewal, Sara Hakeem. “The Ghazal as ‘World Poetry’: Between Worlding and Vernacularization.” Comparative Literature 74, no. 1 (2022): 25–51.
Halfin, Igal. From Darkness Into Light: Class, Consciousness, and Salvation in Revolutionary Russia. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2000.
Hikmet, Nâzım. 835 satır: şiirler 1. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002.
Hikmet, Nâzım. İlk şiirler: şiirler 8. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002.
Hikmet, Nâzım. Konuşmalar. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2002.
Hodgkin, Samuel. “Revolutionary Springtimes: Reading Soviet Persian/Tajik Poetry, from Ghazal to Lyric.” In Iranian Languages and Literatures of Central Asia from the Eighteenth Century to the Present, edited by Matteo de Chiara and Evelin Grassi, 273–305. Paris: Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes, 2015.
Jabbari, Alexander. The Making of Persianate Modernity: Language and Literary History between Iran and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Jrbashyan, Ashkhen Ed. “Haykakan soneti patmut’yunits’.” VEM hamahaykakan hands 1 (2014): 98–125.
Karimi-Hakkak, Ahmad. Recasting Persian Poetry: Scenarios of Poetic Modernity in Iran. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995.
Leezenberg, Michiel. “‘A Rare Pearl Passed from Hand to Hand’: Cosmopolitan Orders and Pre-Modern Forms of Literary Domination.” Journal of World Literature 5 (2020): 253–277.
Lewis, Franklin. “Sincerely Flattering Panegyrics: The Shrinking Ghaznavid Qasida.” In The Necklace of the Pleiades: Studies in Persian Literature, edited by F. Lewis and Sunil Sharma, 209–250. Amsterdam: Rozenberg and Purdue Univ. Press, 2007.
Lotman, Jurij M. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Translated by Ronald Vroon. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Contributions, 1977.
Maghraoui, Abdeslam M. Liberalism Without Democracy: Nationhood and Citizenship in Egypt, 1922–1936. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.
Marashi, Afshin. Exile and the Nation: The Parsi Community of India and the Making of Modern Iran. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2020.
Meisami, Julie Scott. Medieval Persian Court Poetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.
Mitchell, Timothy. “The Stage of Modernity.” In Questions of Modernity, edited by Timothy Mitchell, 1–34. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Najmabadi, Afsaneh. Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards: Gender and Sexual Anxieties of Iranian Modernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles [CA]: University of California Press, 2005.
Opacki, Ireneusz. “Krzyżowanie się postaci gatunkowych jako wyznacznik ewolucji poezji.” Pamiętnik Literacki 54, no. 4 (1963): 349–389.
Ozdemir, Mehtap. “Translation After the Persianate? Omar Khayyam and Late Perso-Ottoman Poetic Connectivity.” Philological Encounters 8, no. 2–3 (2023).
Pickett, James. Polymaths of Islam: Power and Networks of Knowledge in Central Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020.
Pritchett, Frances W. Nets of Awareness: Urdu Poetry and its Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Rajagopalan, Sudha. Indian Films in Soviet Cinemas: The Culture of Movie-going After Stalin. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.
Ram, Harsha. “The Sonnet and the Mukhambasi: Genre Wars on the Edges of the Russian Empire.” PMLA 122:5 (2007): 1548–1570.
Ram, Harsha. “Masks of the Poet, Myths of the People: The Performance of Individuality and Nationhood in Georgian and Russian Modernism.” Slavic Review 67, no. 3 (2008): 567–590.
Rezaeiyazdi, Hamid. “The Dialogical Tradition of Iranian Modernity: Monazereh, Simultaneity, and the Making of Modern Iran.” Iranian Studies 49, no. 3 (2016): 327–357.
Sabir, Mirzə Ələkbər. Hophopnamə, vol. 1. Baku: Şərq-qərb, 2004.
Spooner, Brian and William L. Hanaway, eds. Literacy in the Persianate World: Writing and the Social Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2012.
Tageldin, Shaden M. Disarming Words: Empire and the Seductions of Translation in Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
Thompson, Levi. “A Formal Foundation for Comparative Study of the Late Persianate.” Philological Encounters 8, no. 2–3 (2023).
Tihanov, Galin. The Master and the Slave: Lukács, Bakhtin, and the Ideas of their Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Tihanov, Galin. “Vernacular lessons: Dante, Cavafy, Gombrowicz.” In Vernaculars in an Age of World Literatures, edited by Christina Kullberg and David Watson, 251–259. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.
Tourian, Bedros. Bosphorus Nights: The Complete Lyric Poems of Bedros Tourian. Translation and commentary by James Russell. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2005.
Uniłowski, Krzysztov. “Czy gatunki i konwencje ewoluują (dzisiaj)?” Teksty drugie 3 (2011): 52–63.
Worley, Meg. “Using Ormulum to Redefine Vernacularity.” In The Vulgar Tongue: Medieval and Postmedieval Vernacularity, edited by Fiona Somerset and Nicholas Watson, 19–30. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
Yarshater, Ehsan. “Ḡazal ii. Characteristics and Conventions.” Encyclopaedia Iranica, updated 2006, http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gazal-2.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 220 | 220 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 130 | 130 | 5 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 70 | 6 |
Across the Persianate regions of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Eurasia, the discourse of modernization had a deep, perhaps even dominant aesthetic dimension. Apparently disparate anxieties about oriental indolence, homosexuality and unmanliness, flattery and unmeaning speech, and submission to despots all may be understood as elements of a coherent critique of a single literary mode: taghazzul. Insofar as ghazal was a “royal genre” (Ireneusz Opacki), it provided the formal-aesthetic framing for numerous literary and speech genres, and thus for the social and political order. In case studies from across the Persianate zone, this article considers how writers’ refusal of taghazzul, or its excision from their texts, became a recognizable gesture of disaffiliation from the Persianate. In the resulting reordering of the literary field, taghazzul took on new functions in relation to the Western category of lyric.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 220 | 220 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 130 | 130 | 5 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 70 | 70 | 6 |