In the early phases of the modern study of Buddhism, it was widely assumed that the Buddhist canon preserved in the Pali language by the Theravāda tradition of Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia represented the only original record of the “words of the Buddha” (buddha-vacana). But the notion of Pali primacy has been steadily eroded by discoveries of vast numbers of early Buddhist manuscripts in the formerly Buddhist regions of northwestern India and adjoining countries and in Central Asia. These discoveries have provided ample evidence of the existence in antiquity of voluminous bodies of Buddhist literature in Sanskrit and Gandhari that are parallel to and as historically valid as the Pali versions. They have shifted the perception of Buddhism away from a linear model and toward a wider understanding of the many Buddhisms that coexisted in antiquity. This article surveys some of the major discoveries of Buddhist manuscripts and summarizes the new perspectives that they have engendered.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Allon, Mark. Three Gāndhārī Ekottarikāgama-Type Sūtras: British Library Kharoṣṭhī Fragments 12 and 14. Gandhāran Buddhist Texts 2. Seattle/London: University of Washington Press, 2001.
Allon, Mark. “Recent Discoveries of Buddhist Manuscripts from Afghanistan and their Significance.” In Art, Architecture and Religion Along the Silk Roads, edited by Ken Parry, 153–178. Silk Road Studies 12. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.
Allon, Mark. “The Senior Kharoṣṭhī Manuscripts.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 19–33. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Allon, Mark. “The Formation of Canons in the Early Indian Nikāyas or Schools in Light of the New Gāndhārī Manuscript Finds.” Buddhist Studies Review 35 (2018): 225–244.
Allon, Mark, Geraldine Jacobsen, Richard Salomon, and Ugo Zoppi. “Radiocarbon Dating of Kharoṣṭhī Fragments from the Schøyen and Senior Manuscript Collections.” In Buddhist Manuscripts. Volume III, edited by Jens Braarvig, 279–291. Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection. Oslo: Hermes Publishing, 2006.
Baums, Stefan and Andrew Glass. Catalog of Gāndhārī Texts/Manuscripts. https://gandhari.org/catalog?section=manuscripts. Accessed December 26, 2023.
Braarvig, Jens, ed. Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection: Buddhist Manuscripts, Volume IV. Oslo: Hermes Publishing, 2016.
Braarvig, Jens. “The Schøyen Collection.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 157–164. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Campbell, Jonathan G. Deciphering the Dead Sea Scrolls. Second edition. Malden [MA]: Blackwell Publishing, 2022.
Cox, Collett. “Gāndharī Kharoṣṭhī Manuscripts: Exegetical Texts.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 35–49. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Dimitrov, Dragomir. The Buddhist Indus Script and Scriptures: On the so-called Bhaikṣukī or Saindhavī Script of the Sāṃmitīyas and their Canon. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz. Veröffentlichungen der Fächergruppenkommission für Außereuropäische Sprachen und Kulturen / Studien zur Indologie 7. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2020.
Falk, Harry and Ingo Strauch. “The Bajaur and Split Collections of Kharoṣṭhī Manuscripts within the Context of Buddhist Gāndhārī Literature.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 51–78. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Harrison, Paul. “Canon.” In Encyclopedia of Buddhism, edited by Robert E. Buswell Jr., vol. I, 111–115. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2004.
Harrison, Paul and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, eds. From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research. Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field. Stanford, June 15–19 2009. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch‐historische Klasse, Denkschriften 460 / Beiträge zur Kultur‐ und Geistesgeschichte Asiens 80. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Hartmann, Jens-Uwe and Klaus Wille. “The Manuscript of the Dīrghāgama and the Private Collection in Virginia.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 137–155. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Hinüber, Oskar von. “The Gilgit Manuscripts: An Ancient Buddhist Library in Modern Research.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 79–135. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Jantrasrisalai, Chanida, Timothy Lenz, Lin Qian, and Richard Salomon. “Fragments of an Ekottarikāgama Manuscript in Gāndhārī.” In Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection: Buddhist Manuscripts. Volume IV, edited by Jens Braarvig et al., 1–122. Oslo: Hermes Publishing, 2016.
Levman, Bryan. “Sakāya niruttiyā revisited.” Bulletin d’Études Indiennes 26–27 (2008–2009): 33–51.
Matsuda, Kazunobu. “Japanese Collections of Buddhist Manuscript Fragments from the Same Region as the Schøyen Collection.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 165–169. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2014.
Roebuck, Valerie. The Dhammapada. Penguin Classics. London: Penguin Books, 2010.
Rutz, Matthew T. and Morag M. Kersel, eds. Archaeologies of Text: Archaeology, Technology, and Ethics Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2014.
Salomon, Richard. “An Unwieldy Canon: Observations on Some Distinctive Features of Canon Formation in Buddhism.” In Kanonisierung und Kanonbildung in der asiatischen Religionsgeschichte, edited by Max Deeg, Oliver Freiberger, and Christoph Kleine, 161–207. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 820 / Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens 72. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2011.
Salomon, Richard. “Gāndhārī Manuscripts in the British Library, Schøyen, and Other Collections.” In From Birch‐Bark to Digital Data, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 1–17. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften 2014.
Salomon, Richard. “On the Evolution of Written Āgama Collections in the Northern Buddhist Traditions.” In Research on the Saṃyuktāgama, edited by Dhammadinnā, 239–268. Dharma Drum Institute of Liberal Arts Research Series. Taipei, Taiwan: Dharma Drum Publishing, 2017.
Salomon, Richard. “Recent Discoveries of Early Buddhist Manuscripts and their Implications for the History of Buddhist Texts and Canons.” In Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE, edited by Patrick Olivelle, 349–382. South Asia Research Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Salomon, Richard. The Buddhist Literature of Ancient Gandhāra: An Introduction with Selected Translations. Classics of Indian Buddhism Series. Boston: Wisdom Press, 2018.
Salomon, Richard. “Why Did the Gandhāran Buddhists Bury Their Manuscripts?” In Buddhist Manuscript Cultures: Knowledge, ritual and art, edited by Steven C. Berkwitz, Juliane Schober, and Claudia Brown, 19–34. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism. Routledge: London and New York, 2009.
Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. Third edition. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 86 | 86 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 16 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 40 | 15 |
In the early phases of the modern study of Buddhism, it was widely assumed that the Buddhist canon preserved in the Pali language by the Theravāda tradition of Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia represented the only original record of the “words of the Buddha” (buddha-vacana). But the notion of Pali primacy has been steadily eroded by discoveries of vast numbers of early Buddhist manuscripts in the formerly Buddhist regions of northwestern India and adjoining countries and in Central Asia. These discoveries have provided ample evidence of the existence in antiquity of voluminous bodies of Buddhist literature in Sanskrit and Gandhari that are parallel to and as historically valid as the Pali versions. They have shifted the perception of Buddhism away from a linear model and toward a wider understanding of the many Buddhisms that coexisted in antiquity. This article surveys some of the major discoveries of Buddhist manuscripts and summarizes the new perspectives that they have engendered.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 86 | 86 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 16 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 40 | 15 |