DEFENDING DESIGN ARGUMENTS AGAINST PLANTINGA

In: Philosophia Reformata

This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 188 182 7
Full Text Views 108 104 0
PDF Downloads 12 10 0