DEFENDING DESIGN ARGUMENTS AGAINST PLANTINGA

In: Philosophia Reformata

This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 184 178 12
Full Text Views 108 104 1
PDF Downloads 12 10 0