WHERE THE CONFLICT REALLY LIES: PLANTINGA, THE CHALLENGE OF EVIL, AND RELIGIOUS NATURALISM

In: Philosophia Reformata

In this paper I argue that, although Alvin Plantinga’s Felix Culpa theodicy appears on only two pages (i.e. 58-59) of his recent book Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism (2011), it is of pivotal importance for the book as a whole. Plantinga argues that there is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and monotheism, and that there is superficial concord but deep conflict between science and naturalism. I contend that the weakness of the Felix Culpa theodicy lends support to the view that there is more than superficial conflict between science and monotheism, and offer an alternative response to the challenge of evil which suggests that there might be, after all, concord between science and (religious) naturalism.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 91 79 3
Full Text Views 144 140 0
PDF Downloads 20 20 0