This article examines J.P.A. Mekkes’s post-critical thought with respect to three areas. First, I examine the correlation between faith and hearing, and the corresponding notion of the normativity of revelation, in Mekkes’s religious epistemology. I develop Mekkes’s epistemology in light of an appeal to testimony as the epistemic basis of faith. Second, I examine his claim that there is an irresolvable conflict between the historically situated knower and his claim to make universally valid truth claims. In this context, I raise the question regarding the distinction between epistemic justification and truth, and problems that arise from Mekkes’s failure to draw that distinction. Third, I examine Mekkes’s fundamental theology regarding the meaning of creation revelation, as well as his reluctance to speak of states of affairs, structures of creation, creational law, and the like. I argue that his reluctance stems from not only the philosophical problems I raise regarding his views on justification and truth, but also Mekkes’s emphasis on a Christocentric and eschatological perspective of creation revelation.
AquinasThomas (1987 ) Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius: ‘Whether faith is necessary for the human race’ in Faith, Reason and Theology, translated with introduction and notes by Armand Maurer q.3 a.1 reply 65–66Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesToronto http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/cbt.html.
Balthasar von Hans Urs (1982 ) The Glory of the Lord A Theological Aesthetics Vol. ISeeing the Form translated by Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis and edited by Joseph Fessio S.J. and John T. Riches, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
CrossonF.J. (1985) ‘W.C. Smith on Aquinas’ Journal of Religion Vol. 65/3 (July) 399–412.
DenzingerHeinrich (2012) Compendium of Creeds Definitions and Declarations on Matters of Faith and Morals edited by Peter Hünermann 43rd edition translated and edited by Robert Fastiggi and Anne Englund NashIgnatius PressSan Francisco.
DooyeweerdHerman (1955 ) A New Critique of Theoretical Thought Vol. IThe Necessary Presuppositions of Philosophy translated by D.H. Freeman et al.Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, Philadelphia.
DooyeweerdHerman (1957 ) A New Critique of Theoretical Thought Vol. IIIThe Structures of Individuality of Temporal Reality translated by D.H. Freeman et al.Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, Philadelphia.
EcheverriaEduardo J. (2006) ‘Gadamer’s Hermeneutics and the Question of Relativism’ in Hermeneutics at the Crossroads edited by KevinVanhoozerJames K.A.Smith and Bruce EllisBenson51–81Indiana University PressBloomington and Indianapolis.
GriffioenSander (1995) ‘Creation Order and Transcendental Philosophy: Response to Albert M. Wolters’ in An Ethos of Compassion and the Integrity of Creation edited by Brian J. Walsh et al. 49–56University Press of America, Inc.Lanham.
Hoevenvan der Johan (1995) ‘Portrayal of Reformational Philosophy Seems Unfair: Response to Hendrik Hart’ in An Ethos of Compassion and the Integrity of Creation edited by Brian J. Walsh et al. 109–114University Press of America, Inc.Lanham.
Internationale Konferenz Bekennender Gemeinschaften (2015) ‘Salzburg Declaration: Current Threats to Human Creatureliness and Their Overcoming. Life According to the Creator’s Will’ http://www.ikbg.net/de/aktuelles.php.
II (1996) Catechesis on the Creed Vol. IGod Father and CreatorPauline Books & Media, Boston.
MekkesJ.P.A. (1961) Scheppingsopenbaring en Wijsbegeerte, J.H. Kok, Kampen. English translation: (2010) Creation Revelation and Philosophy translated by Chris van Haeften Sioux Center: Dordt College Press Sioux Center. Both sources will be cited throughout this article first the original followed by the pagination of the English in square brackets.
MekkesJ.P.A. (1965) ‘Le Temps’ in Philosophy and Christianity Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Professor Dr. Herman Dooyeweerd 31–56 J.H. Kok Kampen. English translation: (2012) ‘Time’ in Time and Philosophy translated by Chris van Haeften 1–30 Dordt College Press Sioux Center. Both sources will be cited throughout this article first the original followed by the pagination of the English in square brackets.
MekkesJ.P.A. (1971) Radix tijd en kennen: Proeve ener critiek van de belevingssubjectiviteitBuijten & SchipperheijnAmsterdam.
MekkesJ.P.A. (1973) Tijd der Bezinning Buijten & Schipperheijn Amsterdam. English translation: (2012) ‘Time for Reflection’ in Time and Philosophy translated by Chris van Haeften 31–87 Dordt College Press Sioux Center. Both sources will be cited throughout this article first the original followed by the pagination of the English in square brackets.
MekkesJ.P.A. (1974) ‘Gods “normaal” en wijsbegeerte’ in Wat is Normaal? edited by Hendrik Algra Bob Goudzwaard and J.P.A. Mekkes34–47Bosch & Keuning N.V. Baarn.
NewmanJohn Henry (1839) ‘Love the safeguard of Faith against Superstition’ Sermon xii in Oxford University Sermons preached on Whit Sunday May211839http://www.newmanreader.org/works/oxford/sermon12.html.
WolterstorffNicholas (1991) ‘Is Reason Enough?’ in Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology edited by R.Douglas Geivett and BrendanSweetman142–149Oxford University PressNew York. Reprinted from The Reformed Journal Vol. 31 (April 1981).
Plantinga2000147251–252 266–267. I borrow the apt phrase “modest testimonial foundationalism” from Kevin J. Vanhoozer 2016 72.
This too is the view of Lewis195213–30.
This is the subtitle of Mekkes1971. Mekkes’s “critique of subjectivity” has more similarity to Dooyeweerd’s so-called “first way” rather than “second way” of a “transcendental critique of philosophical thought.”