The Theocentric Perspective of Laudato Si’: A Critical Discussion

in Philosophia Reformata
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In this article, I focus on Pope Francis’s “green” encyclical, Laudato Si’. After outlining some of its characteristics, I single out the pope’s engagement with anthropocentrism for critical discussion. The pope criticizes anthropocentrism (the view that human beings alone have intrinsic value), seeing it as a root cause of ecological destruction. Instead, he proposes what I would call a theocentric conception of nature. I criticize this view. First, I suggest that the pope is insufficiently critical in adopting a theocentric approach to the common creation story. Secondly, I argue from both a biblical-theological and a philosophical perspective against the pope’s resistance to the anthropocentrism of Genesis 1:26. Thirdly, I argue that because the pope opts for non-anthropocentrism, the encyclical falls short of offering a constructive way forward in relation to functioning in a technocratic society. Through these comments, I seek to strengthen the powerful and important message of this encyclical.

The Theocentric Perspective of Laudato Si’: A Critical Discussion

in Philosophia Reformata

Sections

References

Berkhof H. (2007). Christelijk geloof. Kampen: Kok.

Berry T. (1988). The Dream of the Earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club.

Berry T. (1998). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Harmony.

Brennan A. and Lo Y.S. (2011). Environmental Ethics. In: Zalta E.N. ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Autumn 2011). plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/ethics-environmental/.

Bryant M.D. (1995). The Modern Myth of Mastery and the Christian Doctrine of Creation: A Journey in Ecology and Creation Theology. Dialogue & Alliance 9 (2) pp. 5668.

Byrne B. (2016). A Pauline Complement to Laudato Si’ . Theological Studies 77 (2) pp. 308327.

Callicott J.B. (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Capitano W.E. (2005). A Study of the Anthropocentric Nature of Roman Catholic Church Teaching on the Environment from Vatican II to 2003. Ph.D. dissertationUniversity of St. Michael’s College and University of Toronto.

Colyvan M. Linquist S. Grey W. Griffiths P. Odenbaugh J. and Possingham H.P. (2009). Philosophical Issues in Ecology: Recent Trends and Future Directions. Ecology and Society 14 (2) art. 22. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art22/.

Conradie E.M. (2005). An Ecological Christian Anthropology: At Home on Earth? Aldershot: Ashgate.

Conradie E.M. (2006). Christianity and Ecological Theology: Resources for Further Research. Study Guides in Religion and Theology 9. Stellenbosch: Sun.

Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Tavernier J. (2016). Laudato si’: De ecologie van paus Franciscus. Tijdschrift voor Theologie 56 (3) pp. 218243.

Deane-Drummond C. (2016). Laudato Si’ and the Natural Sciences: An Assessment of Possibilities and Limits. Theological Studies 77 (2) pp. 392415.

Francis (2015). Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Vatican City: Vatican Press.

Francis of Assisi (1999). The Canticle of the Sun. In: Armstrong R.J. Hellman J.A.W. and Short W.J. eds. Francis of Assisi: Early Documents—Volume 1New York: Franciscan Institute pp. 113114.

Guardini R. (1950). Das Ende der Neuzeit. Basel: Heβ Verlag.

Hart J. (2006). Sacramental Commons: Christian Ecological Ethics. London: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Leopold A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marcuse H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Mazo J. (2015). The Pope’s Divisions. Survival 57 (4) pp. 203212.

McLaughlin R.P. (2012). Thomas Aquinas’ Eco-Theological Ethics of Anthropocentric Conservation. Horizons 39 (1) pp. 6997.

Moltmann J. (1993). God in Creation: A New Theology of Creation and the Spirit of God (The Gifford Lectures: 1984–1985). Translated by Kohl M. . Minneapolis: Fortress.

Northcott M.S. (1996). The Environment and Christian Ethics. New Studies in Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norton B.G. (1984). Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 6 (2) pp. 131148.

Nullens P.A. (1995). Leven volgens Gaia’s normen? De verhouding tussen God mens en aarde en de implicaties voor ecologische ethiek. Ph.D. dissertationEvangelische Theologische Faculteit.

Orioli L. (2016). Laudato sì and the New Paradigm of Catholic Environmental Ethics: Reflections on Environmentalist Movements in Italy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (6) pp. 931943.

Pattberg P.H. (2007). Conquest, Domination and Control: Europe’s Mastery of Nature in Historic Perspective. Journal of Political Ecology 14 (4) pp. 19.

Peppard C.Z. (2016). Hydrology, Theology, and Laudato Si’ . Theological Studies 77 (2) pp. 416435.

Pitt J.C. (2000). Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.

Primavesi A. (2000). Sacred Gaia: Holistic Theology and Earth System Science. London: Routledge.

Rappel S. (1996). “Macht euch die Erde untertan”: Die ökologische Krise als Folge des Christentums? Abhandlungen zur Sozialethik 39. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

Rasmussen L.L. (2013). Earth-Honoring Faith: Religious Ethics in a New Key. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Regan T. (2004). The Case for Animal Rights. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ruether R.R. (2003). Ecological Theology: Roots in Tradition, Liturgical and Ethical Practice for Today. Dialog: A Journal of Theology 42 (3) pp. 226234.

Ryan P.F. (2006). Secularist and Christian Views of Human Nature and Its Fulfillment: Implications for Bioethics and Environmentalism. In: Robinson D.N. Sweeney G.M. and Gill R. eds. Human Nature in Its Wholeness: A Roman Catholic PerspectiveWashington: The Catholic University of America Press5779.

Schaefer J. (2009). Theological Foundations for Environmental Ethics: Reconstructing Patristic and Medieval Concepts. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Scruton R. (2012). Green Philosophy: How to Think Seriously About the Planet. London: Atlantic Books.

Stinson P. (2015). Pope’s Encyclical Inspiring Government Action. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 57 (6) pp. 2425.

Teilhard de Chardin P. (1965). Hymn of the Universe. Translated by Vann G. . London: Collins.

Tennyson A. (1850). In Memoriam A.H.H . London: Edward Moxon.

Thompson C.J. (2016). Laudato Si’ and the Rise of Green Thomism. Nova et Vetera 14 (3) pp. 745756.

Trist E.L. and Bamford K.W. (1951). Technological Content of the Work System. Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and of Coal-Getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method. Human Relations 4 (3) pp. 338.

Van de Beek A. (1996). Schepping: De wereld als voorspel voor de eeuwigheid. Nijkerk: Callenbach.

Van den Brom L.J. (1997). The Art of a “Theo-Ecological” Interpretation. Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift 51 (4) pp. 298313.

Van den Heuvel S.C. (2016). Laudato Si’: Enkele kritische opmerkingen. Radix 42 (2) pp. 130139.

Van den Heuvel S.C. (2017). Bonhoeffer’s Christocentric Theology and Fundamental Debates in Environmental Ethics . Princeton Theological Monograph Series 217. Eugene: Wipf & Stock Publishers.

Verkerk M.J. (2004). Trust and Power on the Shop Floor: An Ethnographical Ethical and Philosophical Study on Responsible Behaviour in Industrial Organizations. Delft: Eburon.

Verkerk M.J. Hoogland J. Van der Stoep J. and De Vries M.J. (2007). Denken ontwerpen maken: Basisboek techniekfilosofie. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom.

White L.T. (1967). The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis. Science New Series 155 (3767) pp. 12031207.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 43 43 21
Full Text Views 90 90 66
PDF Downloads 5 5 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0