Delimiting Aristotle's Conception of Stasis in the Politics

In: Phronesis
Steven SkultetyDepartment of Philosophy and Religion, Bryant Hall, Rm. 020, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677-1848, USA

Search for other papers by Steven Skultety in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



Some scholars have claimed that Aristotle uses the word "stasis" to refer to any sort of conflict in the political realm, covering everything from civil-war to social rivalry. After developing an interpretation of Politics V.1-4, where Aristotle discusses the topic at length, I argue that he is in fact carefully delimiting the concept of stasis so that it applies only to civil-war and open sedition, showing how his analysis excludes partisan antipathy, legal disputes, and political competition. I conclude with some reflections on the significance of this position: by defining stasis narrowly, Aristotle not only offers a profound critique of Plato's theory of regime change, but adopts a position that allows his political philosophy to be relevant for modern theories requiring acceptance rather than rejection of conflict in the political realm.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 319 70 1
Full Text Views 170 22 0
PDF Views & Downloads 119 43 0