Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Intrinsic Valuing and the Limits of Justice: Why the Ring of Gyges Matters
In: PhronesisAbstract
Commentators such as Terence Irwin and Christopher Shields claim that the Ring of Gyges argument in Republic 2 cannot demonstrate that justice is chosen only for its consequences. This is because valuing justice for its own sake is compatible with judging its value to be overridable. Through examination of the rational commitments involved in valuing normative ideals such as justice, we aim to show that this analysis is mistaken. If Glaucon is right that everyone would endorse Gyges’ behavior, it follows that nobody values justice intrinsically. Hence, the Gyges story constitutes a more serious challenge than critics maintain.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Annas, J. (1981), An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.
-
Burnet, J. (1900-1907) (ed.), Platonis Opera. Oxford.
-
Foster, M. B. (1937), ‘A Mistake of Plato’s in the Republic’, Mind 46: 386-393.
-
Heinaman, R. (2002), ‘Plato’s Division of Goods in the Republic’, Phronesis 47: 309-335.
-
Irwin, T. H. (1999), ‘Republic 2: Questions about Justice’ in G. Fine (ed.), Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul (Oxford), 164-185.
-
Kirwan, C. A. (1965), ‘Glaucon’s Challenge’, Phronesis 10: 162-173.
-
Mabbott, J. D. (1978), ‘Is Plato’s Republic Utilitarian?’ in G. Vlastos (ed.), Plato II: Ethics, Politics, and Philosophy of Art and Religion (Notre Dame), 57-65.
-
Pappas, N. (1995), Plato and the Republic. London.
-
Payne, A. (2011), ‘The Division of Goods and Praising Justice for Itself in Republic II’, Phronesis 56: 58-78.
-
Reeve, C. D. C. (1988), Philosopher Kings. Princeton.
-
Reeve, C. D. C. (2004) (tr.), Plato, Republic. Indianapolis.
-
Shields, C. (2006), ‘Plato’s Challenge: The Case Against Justice in Republic II’ in G. Santas (ed.), Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic (Oxford), 63-83.
-
White, N. P. (1984), ‘The Classification of Goods in Plato’s Republic’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 22: 392-421.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1869 | 152 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 374 | 48 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 461 | 100 | 1 |
Intrinsic Valuing and the Limits of Justice: Why the Ring of Gyges Matters
In: PhronesisAbstract
Commentators such as Terence Irwin and Christopher Shields claim that the Ring of Gyges argument in Republic 2 cannot demonstrate that justice is chosen only for its consequences. This is because valuing justice for its own sake is compatible with judging its value to be overridable. Through examination of the rational commitments involved in valuing normative ideals such as justice, we aim to show that this analysis is mistaken. If Glaucon is right that everyone would endorse Gyges’ behavior, it follows that nobody values justice intrinsically. Hence, the Gyges story constitutes a more serious challenge than critics maintain.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1869 | 152 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 374 | 48 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 461 | 100 | 1 |