Intrinsic Valuing and the Limits of Justice: Why the Ring of Gyges Matters

in Phronesis
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Commentators such as Terence Irwin and Christopher Shields claim that the Ring of Gyges argument in Republic 2 cannot demonstrate that justice is chosen only for its consequences. This is because valuing justice for its own sake is compatible with judging its value to be overridable. Through examination of the rational commitments involved in valuing normative ideals such as justice, we aim to show that this analysis is mistaken. If Glaucon is right that everyone would endorse Gyges’ behavior, it follows that nobody values justice intrinsically. Hence, the Gyges story constitutes a more serious challenge than critics maintain.

Intrinsic Valuing and the Limits of Justice: Why the Ring of Gyges Matters

in Phronesis

Sections

References

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 837 837 238
Full Text Views 104 104 13
PDF Downloads 76 76 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0