Save

On the So-Called Common Books of the Eudemian and the Nicomachean Ethics

In: Phronesis
Author:
Dorothea Frede Universität Hamburg Von-Melle-Park 6, 20146 Hamburg Germany

Search for other papers by Dorothea Frede in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

In recent decades the view that the disputed central books of Aristotle’s ethics are an integral part of the Eudemian rather than of the Nicomachean Ethics has gained ground for both historical and systematic reasons. This article contests that view, arguing not only that the Nicomachean Ethics represented Aristotle’s central text throughout antiquity, but that the discussion in the common books of such crucial concepts as justice, practical and theoretical reason, self-control and lack of self-control, are more compatible with the undisputed books of the Nicomachean Ethics than with those of the Eudemian Ethics.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1075 136 18
Full Text Views 340 36 2
PDF Views & Downloads 354 86 21