Why do human beings, on Aristotle’s view, have an innate tendency to badness, that is, to developing desires that go beyond and against their natural needs? Given Aristotle’s teleological assumptions (including the thesis that nature does nothing in vain), such tendency should not be present. I argue that the culprit is to be found in the workings of rationality, in particular in the (necessary) presence of theoretical reason. As theoretical reason requires that human beings have unlimited non-rational desires for the fine (to kalon), it also gives rise to a tendency to form unlimited non-rational desires for other things.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Annas, J. (1980). Aristotle on Pleasure and Goodness, In: A. O. Rorty, ed., Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 285-299.
Annas, J. (1981). Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.
Balme, D. M. (1987 a). Teleology and Necessity. In: A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, pp. 275-285.
Balme, D. M. (1987 b). Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist. In: A. Gotthelf and J. G. Lennox, eds., Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, pp. 291-312.
Barney, R. (2001). Platonism, Moral Nostalgia, and the ‘City of Pigs’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 27, pp. 207-227.
Barney, R. (2019). Becoming Bad: Aristotle on Vice and Moral Habituation. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 57 (forthcoming).
Baumeister, R. F., and Vohs, K. D. (2003). Willpower, Choice, and Self-Control. In: G. Loewenstein, D. Read and R. F. Baumeister, eds., Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice, New York, pp. 201-216.
Beere, J. (2012). Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford.
Bergson, H. (2013). L’évolution créatrice. Paris.
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of Objectivity. Oxford.
Carone, G. R. (2005). Plato’s Cosmology and its Ethical Dimensions. Cambridge.
Carpenter, A. D. (2008). Embodying Intelligence: Animals and Us in Plato’s Timaeus. In: J. Zovko and J. Dillon, eds., Platonism and Forms of Intelligence, Berlin, pp. 39-58.
Caston, V. (1996). Why Aristotle Needs Imagination. Phronesis 41, pp. 20-55.
Charles, D. (1984). Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. London.
Cooper, J. M. (2004 a). Two Theories of Justice. In: Cooper, Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton, pp. 247-269.
Cooper, J. M. (2004 b). Aristotle on Natural Teleology. In: Cooper, Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton, pp. 107-129.
Corcilius, K. (2008). Streben und Bewegen: Aristoteles’ Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewegung. Berlin.
Corcilius, K. (2015). Faculties in Ancient Philosophy. In: D. Perler, ed., The Faculties. A History. Oxford, pp. 19-58.
Crombie, I. M. (1962). An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. Vol. 1. London.
de Sade, D. A. F. (1998 a). La Philosophie dans le boudoir, ou Les Instituteurs immoraux. In: Sade: Œuvres, ed. M. Delon, Paris, pp 1-178.
de Sade, D. A. F. (1998 b). Juliette ou les prospérités du vice. In: Sade: Œuvres, ed. M. Delon, Paris, pp. 179-1262.
Devereux, D. (1995). Socrates’ Kantian Conception of Virtue. The Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, pp. 381-408.
Evans, D. (2011). Serial Analysis and the Unity of the Human Person. In: C. Rossitto, ed., La Psychologie d’Aristote, Paris, pp. 45-56.
Freudenthal, G. (1995). Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul. Oxford.
Garrett, J. E. (1993). The Moral Status of ‘the Many’ in Aristotle. Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, pp. 171-191.
Gelber, J. (2015). Aristotle on Essence and Habitat. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48, pp. 267-293.
Goldin, O. (1993). Aristotle on Good and Bad Actualities. The Journal of Neoplatonic Studies 2, pp. 126-150.
Goodall, J. (1968). The Behaviour of Free-living Chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. London.
Gottlieb, P. and Sober, E. (2017). Aristotle on ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain’. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7, pp. 246-271.
Gould, T. (1971). The Metaphysical Foundations for Aristotle’s Ethics. In: J. P. Anton and G. L. Kustas, eds., Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Albany, pp. 451-461.
Gregorić, P. (2005). Plato’s and Aristotle’s Explanation of Human Posture. Rhizai 2, pp. 183-196.
Grice, P. (1974-75). Method in Philosophical Psychology (From the Banal to the Bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48, pp. 23-53.
Güremen, R. and Jaulin, A., eds. (2017). Aristote, l’animal politique. Paris.
Hall, K. R. L. and Schaller, G. B. (1964). Tool-Using Behavior of the California Sea Otter. Journal of Mammalogy 45, pp. 287-298.
Henry, D. (2013). Optimality and Teleology in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45, pp. 225-264.
Holzhaider, J. C., Hunt, G. R. and Gray, R. D. (2010). The Development of Pandanus Tool Manufacture in Wild New Caledonian Crows. Behaviour 147, pp. 553-586.
Johansen, T. K. (2008). Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Oxford.
Johansen, T. K. (2017). Aristotle on the Logos of the Craftsman. Phronesis 62, pp. 97-135.
Johnson, M. (2005). Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford.
Kamtekar, R. (2018). Explaining Evil in Plato, Euripides, and Seneca. In: A. Chignell, ed., Evil: A History, Oxford, pp. 97-128.
Katz, E. C. and Polansky, R. (2006). The Bad is Last But Does not Last: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ 9. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31, pp. 233-242.
Kontos, P. (2014). Non-Virtuous States in Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47, pp. 205-243.
Kontos, P., ed. (2018 a). Evil in Aristotle. Cambridge.
Kontos, P. (2018b). Radical Evil in Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics. In: Kontos 2018a, pp. 75-97.
Kullmann, W. (1991). Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle. In: D. Keyt and F. D. Miller, Jr., eds., A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, pp. 94-117.
Labarrière, J.-L. (1990). De la phronèsis animale. In: D. Devereux and P. Pellegrin, eds., Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, pp. 405-428.
Lennox, J. (2001). Nature Does Nothing in Vain. In: J. Lennox, ed., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge, pp. 205-224.
Lennox, J. (2010). Bios and Explanatory Unity in Aristotle’s Biology. In: D. Charles, ed., Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford, pp. 329-355.
Leunissen, M. (2010). Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge.
Leunissen, M. (2011). ‘Crafting Natures’: Aristotle on Animal Design. Philosophic Exchange 41, pp. 2-25.
McDavid, B. (2019). On Why the City of Pigs and Clocks Are Not Just. Journal of the History of Philosophy 57, pp. 571-594.
Müller, J. (2015 a). Agency and Responsibility in Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics. Phronesis 60, pp. 205-251.
Müller, J. (2015 b). Aristotle on Vice. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23, pp. 459-477.
Müller, J. (2018). Practical and Productive Thinking in Aristotle. Phronesis 63, pp. 148-175.
Nielsen, K. M. (2017). Vice in the Nicomachean Ethics. Phronesis 62, pp. 1-25.
Nightingale, A. W. (1996). Plato on the Origins of Evil: The Statesman Myth Reconsidered. Ancient Philosophy 16, pp. 65-91.
Nussbaum, M. (1986). The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge.
Pearson, G. (2018). Aristotle on Psychopathology. In: Kontos 2018a, pp. 122-49.
Pellegrin, P. (2017 a). L’Excellence menacée. Paris.
Pellegrin, P. (2017b). Y a-t-il une sociobiologie aristotélicienne? In Güremen and Jaulin 2017, pp. 13-30.
Rabinoff, E. (2015). Rational and Non-rational Perception in Aristotle’s De Anima. Epoché 19, pp. 297-309.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1988). Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Princeton.
Reeve, C. D. C. (2018). Good and Bad in Aristotle. In: Kontos 2018a: 17-31.
Richardson Lear, G. (2006). Aristotle on Moral Virtue and the Fine. In: R. Kraut, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford, pp. 116-137.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2007). Human Nature and Moral Education in Mencius, Xunzi, Hobbes, and Rousseau. History of Philosophy Quarterly 24, pp. 147-168.
Sedley, D. N. (2007). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley.
Sherman, N. (1985). Character, Planning, and Choice in Aristotle. The Review of Metaphysics 39, pp. 83-106.
Silverman, A. (2007). Ascent and Descent: The Philosopher’s Regret. Social Philosophy and Policy 24, pp. 40-69.
Smith, A. D. (1996). Character and Intellect in Aristotle’s Ethics. Phronesis 41, pp. 56-74.
Sorabji, R. K. (1995). Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca.
Stavrianeas, S. (2018). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Natural Teleology and its Failures in Aristotle. In: Kontos 2018a, pp. 51-71.
Stocker, M. (1979). Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 76, pp. 738-753.
Sussman, D. (2009). For Badness’ Sake. The Journal of Philosophy 106, pp. 613-628.
Thein, K. (2017). Aristotelés o lidské přirozenosti. Od myšlení k anatomii. Prague.
Velleman, J. D. (1992). The Guise of the Good. Nous 26, pp. 3-26.
Vlastos, G. (1939). The Disorderly Motion in the Timaeus. Classical Quarterly 33, pp. 71-83.
White, S. A. (1992). Natural Virtue and Perfect Virtue in Aristotle. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8, pp. 135-168.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1919). Platon II. Berlin.
Witt, C. (2012). Aristotle on Deformed Animal Kinds. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, pp. 83-106.
Wood, J. L. (2009). Is There an Archê Kakou in Plato? The Review of Metaphysics 63, pp. 349-384.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1364 | 162 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 221 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 418 | 44 | 3 |
Why do human beings, on Aristotle’s view, have an innate tendency to badness, that is, to developing desires that go beyond and against their natural needs? Given Aristotle’s teleological assumptions (including the thesis that nature does nothing in vain), such tendency should not be present. I argue that the culprit is to be found in the workings of rationality, in particular in the (necessary) presence of theoretical reason. As theoretical reason requires that human beings have unlimited non-rational desires for the fine (to kalon), it also gives rise to a tendency to form unlimited non-rational desires for other things.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1364 | 162 | 19 |
Full Text Views | 221 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 418 | 44 | 3 |