This paper takes a detailed look at the Republic’s Divided Line analogy and considers how we should respond to its most contentious implication: that pistis and dianoia have the same degree of ‘clarity’ (
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adam, J. (1902). The Republic of Plato, vol. 2. Cambridge.
Annas, J. (1975). ‘On the “Intermediates”’. Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 57, pp. 146–166.
Balashov, Y. (1994). ‘Should Plato’s Divided Line Be Divided in the Mean and Extreme Ratio?’. Ancient Philosophy 14, pp. 283–295.
Bedu-Addo, J. T. (1976). ‘A Theory of Mental Development: Plato’s Republic V–VII. Part I’. Platon 28, pp. 288–301.
Bedu-Addo, J. T. (1978). ‘Mathematics, Dialectic and the Good in the Republic VI–VII’. Platon 30, pp. 111–127.
Bedu-Addo, J. T. (1979). ‘Διάνοια and the Images of Forms in Plato’s Republic VI–VII’. Platon 31, pp. 89–110.
Belfiore, E. (1984). ‘A Theory of Imitation in Plato’s Republic’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 144, pp. 121–146.
Benson, H. (2015). Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Platos Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford.
Boyle, A. J. (1973). ‘Plato’s Divided Line: Essay 1: The Problem of διάνοια’. Apeiron 7, pp. 1–11.
Boyle, A. J. (1974). ‘Plato’s Divided Line: Essay 2: Mathematics and Dialectic’. Apeiron 8, pp. 7–21.
Broadie, S. (2021). Plato’s Sun-Like Good. Cambridge.
Brumbaugh, R. S. (1952). ‘Plato’s Divided Line’. The Review of Metaphysics 5, pp. 529–534.
Brumbaugh, R. S. (1954). Plato’s Mathematical Imagination. Bloomington.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1987). ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’. In: Graeser, A., ed., Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Bern and Stuttgart, pp. 145–172.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999). ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. In: Peterson, G., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 20, Salt Lake City, pp. 215–354.
Burnyeat, M. F. (2000). ‘Plato on Why Mathematics is Good for the Soul’. In: Smiley, T., ed., Mathematics and Necessity in the History of Philosophy, Oxford, pp. 1–81.
Byrd, M. (2018). ‘Mathematics. Mental Imagery, and Ontology: A New Interpretation of the Divided Line’. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 12, pp. 111–131.
Cooper, N. (1966), ‘The Importance of διάνοια in Plato’s Theory of Forms’, Classical Quarterly, 16, 65–69.
Cornford, F. M. (1932). ‘Mathematics and Dialectic in the Republic VI–VII (1 & 2)’. Mind 41, pp. 37–52, 173–190.
Cross, R. C. and Woozley, A. D. (1964). Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London.
Denyer, N. (2007). ‘Sun and Line: The Role of the Good’. In: Ferrari, G. R. F., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, pp. 284–309.
Des Jardins, G. (1976). ‘How to Divide the Divided Line’. The Review of Metaphysics 29, pp. 483–496.
Dominick, Y. H. (2010). ‘Seeing Through Images: The Bottom of Plato’s Divided Line’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48, pp. 1–13.
Dreher, J. P. (1990). ‘The Driving Ratio in Plato’s Divided Line’. Ancient Philosophy 10, pp. 159–172.
Echterling, T. (2018). ‘What Did Glaucon Draw? A Diagrammatic Proof for Plato’s Divided Line’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 56, pp. 1–15.
Ferguson, A. S. (1921). ‘Plato’s Simile of Light. Part I’. Classical Quarterly 15, pp. 131–152.
Ferguson, A. S. (1922). ‘Plato’s Simile of Light. Part II. The Allegory of the Cave (Continued)’. Classical Quarterly 16, pp. 15–28.
Ferguson, A. S. (1934). ‘Plato’s Simile of Light Again’. Classical Quarterly 28, pp. 190–120.
Ferguson, J. (1963). ‘Sun, Line, and Cave Again’. Classical Quarterly 13, pp. 188–193.
Findlay, J. N. (1974). Plato: The Written and Unwritten Doctrines. New York.
Fine, G. (1993). On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford.
Fine, G. (2003). ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’. In: Plato on Knowledge and Forms, Oxford, pp. 85–116.
Fogelin, R. J. (1971). ‘Three Platonic Analogies’. The Philosophical Review 80, pp. 371–382.
Foley, R. (2008). ‘Plato’s Undividable Line: Contradiction and Method in Republic VI’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46, pp. 1–23.
Gallop, D. (1965). ‘Image and Reality in Plato’s Republic’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47, pp. 113–131.
Gonzalez, F. J. (1996). ‘Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V’. Phronesis 41, pp. 245–275.
Gould, J. (1955). The Development of Plato’s Ethics. Cambridge.
Grube, G. M. A. and Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Plato, Republic. Indianapolis.
Halliwell, S. (2002). The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Princeton.
Harte, V. (2007). ‘Language in the Cave’. In: Scott, D., ed., Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford, pp. 195–215.
Jackson, H. (1881). ‘On Plato’s Republic VI 509 d sqq.’. The Journal of Philology 10, pp. 132–150.
Lesher, J. H. (2010). ‘The Meaning of Saphêneia in Plato’s Divided Line’. In: McPherran, M., ed., A Critical Guide to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, pp. 171–187.
Malcolm, J. (1962). ‘The Line and the Cave’. Phronesis 7, pp. 38–45.
Malcolm, J. (1981). ‘The Cave Revisited’. The Classical Quarterly 31, pp. 60–68.
Mohr, R. (1984). ‘The Divided Line and the Doctrine of Recollection in Plato’. Apeiron 18, pp. 34–41.
Morrison, J. S. (1977). ‘Two Unresolved Difficulties in the Line and Cave’. Phronesis 22, pp. 212–231.
Moss, J. (2021). Plato’s Epistemology: Being and Seeming. Oxford.
Murphy, N. R. (1932). ‘The “Simile of Light” in Plato’s Republic’. Classical Quarterly 26, pp. 93–102.
Murphy, N. R. (1951). The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic. Oxford.
Nettleship, R. L. (1897). Lectures on Plato’s Republic. London.
Pappas, N. (1995). Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Plato and the Republic. London.
Patterson, R. (2007). ‘Diagram, Dialectic, and Mathematical Foundations in Plato’. Apeiron 40, pp. 1–34.
Payne, A. (2017). The Teleology of Action in Plato’s Republic. Oxford.
Pomeroy, S. B. (1971). ‘Optics and the Line in Plato’s Republic’. Classical Quarterly 21, pp. 389–392.
Raven, J. E. (1953). ‘Sun, Divided Line, and Cave’. Classical Quarterly 3, 22–32.
Raven, J. E. (1965). Plato’s Thought in the Making. Cambridge.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1988). Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Princeton.
Reeve, C. D. C. (2010). ‘Blindness and reorientation: education and the acquisition of knowledge in the Republic’. In McPherran, M., ed., A Critical Guide to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, pp. 209–228.
Ringbom (1965). ‘Plato on Images’. Theoria 31, pp. 86–109.
Robinson, R. (1941). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Ithaca.
Rose, L. E. (1964). ‘Plato’s Divided Line’. The Review of Metaphysics 17, pp. 425–435.
Ross, D. (1951). Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford.
Sayre, K. (1983). Plato’s Late Ontology. Princeton.
Sedley, D. (2007). ‘Philosophy, Forms, and the Art of Ruling’. In: Ferrari, G. R. F., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge, pp. 256–283.
Shorey, P. (1885). ‘The Idea of the Good in Plato’s Republic’. Studies in Classical Philology 1, pp. 188–239.
Slings, S. R. (2005). Critical Notes on Plato’s Politeia. Leiden.
Smith, N. D. (1981). ‘The Objects of Dianoia in Plato’s Divided Line’. Apeiron 15, pp. 129–137.
Smith, N. D. (1996). ‘Plato’s Divided Line’. Ancient Philosophy 16, 25–46.
Smith, N. D. (2000). ‘Plato on Knowledge as a Power’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38, pp. 145–168.
Smith, N. D. (2012). ‘Plato on the Power of Ignorance’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Suppl. Vol., pp. 51–73.
Smith, N. D. (2019). Summoning Knowledge in Plato’s Republic. Oxford.
Stocks, J. L. (1911). ‘The Divided Line of Plato Rep. VI’. Classical Quarterly 5, pp. 73–88.
Storey, D. (2020). ‘What is Eikasia?’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58, pp. 19–57.
Storey, D. (forthcoming). ‘The Soul-Turning Metaphor in Plato’s Republic Book 7’. Classical Philology.
Tanner, R. G. (1970). ‘διάνοια and Plato’s Cave’. Classical Quarterly 20, pp. 81–91.
Wedberg, A. (1955). Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Stockholm.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 700 | 462 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 115 | 91 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 315 | 247 | 20 |
This paper takes a detailed look at the Republic’s Divided Line analogy and considers how we should respond to its most contentious implication: that pistis and dianoia have the same degree of ‘clarity’ (
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 700 | 462 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 115 | 91 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 315 | 247 | 20 |