Mixing Body and Soul: Galen on the Substance of Soul in QAM and De Propriis Placitis

In: Phronesis

Abstract

In a late treatise, That the Capacities of the Soul Follow the Mixtures of the Body (QAM), Galen of Pergamum infamously offered the view that the substance of the soul is identical with a bodily mixture. This thesis has been found radical and extreme in modern scholarship and is generally considered to be at odds with Galen’s ‘agnosticism’ on the substance of soul. In this paper I propose a close reading of QAM that allows us to make sense of it in terms of Galen’s other work, including his late work On My Own Opinions (De Propriis Placitis).

  • BazouA. ed. (2011). Γαληνοῦ ῞Οτι ταῖς τοῦ σώµατος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάµεις ἕπονται. Athens.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boudon-MillotV. and PietrobelliA. eds. (2005). Galien ressuscité. Edition princeps du texte grec du De Propriis Placitis. Revue des Études Grecques 118 pp 168-213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De LacyP. H. ed. (1996). Galeni de elementis ex hippocratis sententiaCMG V 1 2. Berlin.

  • GarofaloI. and LamiA. eds. (2012). Galeno l’anima e il dolore. De indolentia; De propriis placitis. Milan.

  • KühnC. G. ed. (1821-1833). Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia. Hildesheim.

  • MewaldtJ. ed. (1914). Galeni in Hippocratis De natura hominis. CMG v. 9.1. Leipzig.

  • MoraniM. ed. (2018). La natura dell’uomo Nemesio di Emesa. Bologna.

  • MüllerI. ed. (1967). Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora. Vol. 2. Amsterdam.

  • BarnesJ. and JouannaJ. eds. (2003). Galien et la philosophie. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 49. Geneva.

  • BrockA. J. tr. (1916). Galen. On the Natural Faculties. Cambridge.

  • ChiaradonnaR. (2014). Galen on what is Persuasive (pithanon) and what Approximates Truth. In: P. AdamsonR. Hansberger and J. Wilberding eds. Philosophical Themes in Galen. London pp. 61-88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chiaradonna R. (unpublished). Aspects of Causation in Galen’s Work on Pulse.

  • CastonV. (1997). Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern. The Philosophical Review 106 pp. 309-363.

  • DarembergC. V. ed. (1848). Fragments du commentaire de Galien sur le Timée de Platon. Paris.

  • DasA. (2014). Reevaluating the Authenticity of the Fragments from Galen’s On the Medical Statements in Plato’s Timaeus (Scorialensis Graec. Φ-III-11, ff. 123r-126v). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 192 pp. 93-103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DoniniP. L. (2008). Psychology. In: R. J. Hankinson ed. The Cambridge Companion to Galen (Cambridge) pp. 184-209.

  • Frede M. (2003). Galen’s Theology. In: Barnes and Jouanna 2003 pp. 73-130.

  • Garcia-BallesterL. (1988). Soul and Body, Disease of the Soul and Disease of the Body in Galen’s Medical Thought. In: P. Manuli and M. Vegetti eds. Le opera psicologiche di Galeno (Naples) pp. 44-63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HankinsonR. J. tr. (1991). Galen On the Therapeutic Method books I and II. Oxford.

  • Hankinson R. J. (2003). Causation in Galen. In Barnes and Jouanna 2003 pp. 31-72.

  • HankinsonR. J. (2006). Body and Soul in Galen. In: R. A. H. King ed. Common to Body and Soul (Berlin) pp. 232-258.

  • HankinsonR. J. (2008). Philosophy of Nature. In: Hankinson ed. The Cambridge Companion to Galen (Cambridge) pp. 210-241.

  • HankinsonR. J. (2014). Galen and the Ontology of Powers. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 pp. 951-973.

  • HankinsonR. J. (2017). Substance, Element, Quality, Mixture: Galen’s Physics and his Hippocratic Inheritance. Aitia 7.2. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/1863.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HankinsonR. J. tr. (forthcoming). Galen Commentary on Hippocrates’ Nature of Man. Oxford.

  • HavrdaM. (2017). Body and Cosmos in Galen’s Account of the Soul. Phronesis 62 pp. 69-89.

  • KupreevaI. (2014). Galen’s Theory of Elements. In: P. AdamsonR. Hansberger and J. Wilberding eds. Philosophical Themes in Galen (London) pp. 153-196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LloydG. E. R. (1988). Scholarship, Authority and Argument in Galen’s Quod animi mores. In: P. Manuli and M. Vegetti eds. Le opera psicologiche di Galeno (Naples) pp. 11-42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarechalP. (2019). Galen’s Constitutive Materialism. Ancient Philosophy 39 pp. 191-209.

  • MorauxP. (1973). Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Vol. 2. Berlin.

  • SchröderH. and KahleP. eds. (1934). Galeni in Platonis Timaeum commentarii fragmenta. CMG I supplementum. Leipzig: Teubner.

  • SedleyD. N. (2011). Matter in Hellenistic Philosophy. In: D. Giovannozzi and M. Veneziani eds. Materia: (Rome) pp. 53-66.

  • SharplesR. W. and van der EijkP. J. trs. (2008). Nemesius On the Nature of Man. Liverpool.

  • SingerP. N. tr. (1997). Galen. Selected Works. Oxford.

  • SingerP. N. tr. (2013). Galen: Psychological Writings. New York.

  • StrohmaierG. (1970). Über die Verschiedenheit der homoiomeren Körperteilen. CMG 3 Supplementum Oriëntale. Berlin.

  • Tieleman T. (2003). Galen’s Psychology. In: Barnes and Jouanna 2002 pp. 131-70.

  • TielemanT. (2018). Galen and Doxography. In: J. Mansfeld and D. T. Runia eds. Aëtiana IV (Leiden) pp. 452-471.

  • Van der EijkP. J. tr. (2006). Philoponus On Aristotle On the Soul 1.3-5. London.

  • VegettiM. (2000). De caelo in terram. Il Timeo in Galeno (De placitis, Quod animi). In: A. Brancacci ed. La filosofia in età imperial (Naples) pp. 69-84.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 27
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 2