This article examines the gendered implications of healing theologies in black South African pentecostal churches dealing with the HIV/AIDS crisis. Lived theologies of healing enhance women’s flourishing by providing or encouraging medical, social, and psychological support. However, pentecostal theologies of healing can impede women’s flourishing by creating a burdensome sense of responsibility in which women blame themselves for not being healed. More disturbingly, many women consider prayer as the most faithful or most feasible strategy for HIV prevention. This article identifies women’s constrained choices as a theological imperative for Pentecostalism to address gender inequality.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
In 2011, an estimated 34 million people were living with HIV/AIDS around the globe; also in 2011, approximately 2.5 million people became infected with HIV, and 1.7 million people died of AIDS-related causes. This is 0.8 percent of adults between the ages of 15 and 49 worldwide [UNAIDS, Global AIDS Report: UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic (Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2012), 8].
In 2008, South African women comprised 3.2 million of South Africa’s 4.6 million infected adults. UNAIDS, Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic (Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2008), 32.
Ibid., 3. The Pew study also cites South Africa’s 2001 census data, according to which 7.6 percent of South Africans are pentecostal and 31.8 percent belong to African Independent Churches (Spirit and Power, 87). The terminological distinctions within South African Christianity are imprecise: African Independent Churches or AICs (churches founded by Africans) are often pentecostal or charismatic in practice, and some scholars debate whether to include them as part of the African pentecostal/charismatic movement (Ogbu Kalu, African Pentecostalism: An Introduction [New York: Oxford University Press, 2008]: 66). I encountered contestation around the term as well: one pastor considered his (formerly AFM) church to be an African Independent Church, despite its continued similarity to AFM beliefs and practices. This was somewhat confusing because the church was not affiliated with the major AICs in South Africa, such as the Zion Christian Church or the Ethiopian churches, and in fact it did not consider members of these AICs churches to be “born again.” Likewise, Kalu notes “the demonization of the AICs in Pentecostal rhetoric as unadulterated cults” (Kalu, African Pentecostalism, 66).
Allan Anderson, An Introduction to Pentecostalism: Global Charismatic Christianity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 30. Candy Gunther Brown (“Introduction: Pentecostalism and the Globalization of Illness and Healing,” in Global Pentecostalism and Charismatic Healing, ed. Candy Gunther Brown [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011], 3–26, at 3) argues that divine healing “is the single most important category—more significant than glossolalia or prosperity—for understanding the global expansion of pentecostal Christianity.” Brown’s edited volume contains a host of case studies that associate conversion and church membership with divine healing. For example, Michael Bergunder’s study of South Indian Pentecostals (“Miracle Healing and Exorcism in South Indian Pentecostalism,” in Global Pentecostalism and Charismatic Healing, 287–306) showed that church members primarily connected with the church by way of healings or exorcisms. R. Andrew Chesnut (“Exorcising the Demons of Deprivation: Divine Healing and Conversion in Brazilian Pentecostalism,” in Global Pentecostalism and Charismatic Healing, 169–186) found in fieldwork in Brazil that fewer than half of his participants spoke in tongues, whereas a large majority said they had experienced divine healing.
Quoted by Cephas N. Omenyo, “New Wine in an Old Bottle? Charismatic Healing in the Mainline Churches in Ghana,” in Global Pentecostalism and Charismatic Healing, 231–249, at 236.
Miroslav Volf, “Materiality of Salvation: An Investigation in the Soteriologies of Liberation and Pentecostal Theologies,” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 26, no. 3 (1989): 447–467, at 448, italics in the original.
Lisa P. Stephenson, Dismantling the Dualisms for American Pentecostal Women in Ministry: A Feminist-Pneumatological Approach (Leiden: Brill, 2012), winner of the 2013 Pneuma Book Award.
Ibid., 192.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 42 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 242 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 10 | 1 |
This article examines the gendered implications of healing theologies in black South African pentecostal churches dealing with the HIV/AIDS crisis. Lived theologies of healing enhance women’s flourishing by providing or encouraging medical, social, and psychological support. However, pentecostal theologies of healing can impede women’s flourishing by creating a burdensome sense of responsibility in which women blame themselves for not being healed. More disturbingly, many women consider prayer as the most faithful or most feasible strategy for HIV prevention. This article identifies women’s constrained choices as a theological imperative for Pentecostalism to address gender inequality.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 284 | 42 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 242 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 10 | 1 |