Save

Die mögliche Welt des Romans

Kontingenz und Verhängnis in Daniel Casper von Lohensteins Arminius-Roman (Erster Teil)

In: Poetica
Authors:
Armin Schäfer Germanistisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Bochum Deutschland

Search for other papers by Armin Schäfer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Alexander Waszynski Institut für Deutsche Philologie, Universität Greifswald Greifswald Deutschland

Search for other papers by Alexander Waszynski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This essay tests the concept of the possible world for an analysis of Daniel Casper von Lohenstein’s novel Arminius (1689/90). Starting from the basic literary concept of ‘world’, which usually has the function of establishing a distinction between reality and fiction, the paper first examines, using the example of battle, fight, and war, how the novel depicts contingency and how its depictions are related to the concepts of providentiality and doom, which in turn are reconstructed as subsequent interpretations. A narrative analysis traces how the novel contributes to a pluralization of the concept of ‘world’. While Lohenstein presents coincidences and misfortunes in their fateful concatenation encompassing long periods of time and thus, on the whole, establishes the aberration of the narrated from the historical events, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz exemplifies the equality of possible and real world frequently by resorting to narrative strategies. The possible world of the novel serves as a reminder that the real world could be a different one.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 198 55 2
Full Text Views 20 7 0
PDF Views & Downloads 66 21 0